1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

TI OMAP4660 ARM Cortex-A9 PandaBoard ES Benchmarks

Michael Larabel

Published on 27 December 2011
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 3 of 11 - 58 Comments

With not having any other working ARM development builds to compare the PandaBoard ES performance to locally, I made things interesting and compared the PandaBoard ES to several (mostly older) Intel mobile processors. (For those wondering, I do plan to get a Raspberry Pi board for benchmarking when they are available.)

There is also a pre-production OLPC XO-1.75 that I used for running some tests, but since its software stack is limited and couldn't be loaded with Ubuntu at this time, there isn't as many tests that were run on this much slower single-core 800MHz ARM notebook. The OLPC XO-1.75 also has only 512MB of RAM and 4GB of flash storage.

The PandaBoard ES with its dual-core ARM Cortex-A9 clocked up to 1.2GHz, 1GB of RAM, and 16GB of SDHC storage was compared to an Intel Atom N270 netbook (a Dell Mini 9) with 1GB of RAM and 8GB of solid-state storage, an Intel Atom Z530 Poulsbo with 1GB of RAM and a 160GB HDD (the CompuLab Fit-PC2), an Intel Pentium M 1.86GHz notebook with 2GB of RAM and 80GB HDD (a IBM ThinkPad R52), and lastly was a Lenovo ThinkPad T60 consisting of an Intel Core Duo T2400 with 1GB of RAM and 80GB hard drive. All of the Ubuntu setups were using clean installs of Ubuntu 11.10 in their stock configuration with the Linux 3.0 kernel, Unity desktop, and GCC 4.6.1 -- the only exception was the XO-1.75 with its OLPC 11 operating system that is derived from Fedora.

With not comparing the ARM graphics performance in this article and the storage mediums being different due to no SATA support on the PandaBoard ES, etc, being published in this article are mostly the processor-focused benchmarks. However, on the OpenBenchmarking.org result file are about four dozen different ARM test profiles used.

While the Phoronix Test Suite is capable of monitoring the system power consumption during testing, due to the different device form factors (some netbooks/notebooks with attached display), no power monitoring was done in this article.

Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. AMD R600g/RadeonSI Performance On Linux 3.16 With Mesa 10.3-devel
  2. Intel Pentium G3258 On Linux
  3. SilverStone Precision PS10
  4. ASRock Z97 Extreme6
Latest Linux Articles
  1. KVM Benchmarks On Ubuntu 14.10
  2. X.Org Server 1.16 Officially Released With Terrific Features
  3. Ubuntu With Linux 3.16 Smashes OS X 10.9.4 On The MacBook Air
  4. Preview: Benchmarking CentOS 7.0 & Scientific Linux 7.0
Latest Linux News
  1. Fedora 21 Has Been Delayed By Three Weeks
  2. Mono Begins To Focus On Performance, Assembles A Team
  3. Oracle Linux 7 Released Today As Its RHEL7 Clone
  4. Unigine Develops City Traffic System, A Driving Simulator
  5. Intel 3.0 X.Org Driver Still Baking, New Development Release
  6. Eric Anholt Makes Progress With Broadcom VC4 Graphics Driver
  7. Intel Is Getting Very Close To OpenGL 4.0/4.1/4.2 Mesa Support
  8. Valve Is Still Hiring For SteamOS, Linux Work
  9. Users Warned About Possible Regressions With DRI3
  10. GNOME Shell Gets Wayland HiDPI Fonts, Mutter Gets Touch Gestures
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  2. Radeon related kernel bug??
  3. AMD Publishes Open-Source Linux HSA Kernel Driver
  4. Next-Gen OpenGL To Be Announced Next Month
  5. Open-Source Radeon Performance Boosted By Linux 3.16
  6. Remote gui not accessible in Phoronix Test Suite 5.2
  7. AMD "Hawaii" Open-Source GPU Acceleration Still Not Working Right
  8. In Road To Qt, Audacious Switches From GTK3 Back To GTK2