1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

TI OMAP4660 ARM Cortex-A9 PandaBoard ES Benchmarks

Michael Larabel

Published on 27 December 2011
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 2 of 11 - 58 Comments

When seeing the new PandaBoard ES, I decided to buy one of these $182 USD development boards (the price doesn't include a +5V 4Amp power adapter or any persistent SDHC storage) for Phoronix to be used for some new ARMv7 Linux benchmarking and also working on some benchmark support and other ARM hardware enhancements within the Phoronix Test Suite and OpenBenchmarking.org.

After running some benchmarks on the PandaBoard ES over Christmas (along with the AMD A8-3870K APU and taking care of other Phoronix work), I am quite pleased with this Texas Instruments OMAP4460 platform -- well sans the entire ARM graphics situation.

In the past I've been working on better ARM Linux benchmarks via the HP TouchPad (the Phoronix Test Suite has worked on webOS going back to the Palm days, but the selection of tests is limited), the Nokia N900 but its software stack and performance is lackluster, and the Qualcomm Snapdragon MDP MSM8660. Qualcomm Innovation Center sent over the very impressive Qualcomm Snapdragon MDP MSM8660, but while working on improved Google Android support for the Phoronix Test Suite and other benchmarking of this Snapdragon development platform, the MDP seems to have died. Though that's not the first time ARM hardware has failed due to torturing it too much with benchmarks, as a NAS storage device even died when pushing it too hard with ARM Linux benchmarks.

I'm very pleased to report with all of the benchmarks thrown at the PandaBoard ES so far, it's ran beautifully without fault. Thanks to its open design and being able to run a full Ubuntu ARM stack, there's dozens of test profiles from the Phoronix Test Suite that can be run on the dual-core ARM development build. In this article is just a portion of the benchmarks from the PandaBoard ES.

Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. AMD Launches New FX CPUs, Cuts Prices On Existing Processors
  2. Preview: AMD's FX-9590 Eight-Core At Up To 5.0GHz On Linux
  3. Intel Launches The Core i7 5960X, Mighty Powerful Haswell-E CPUs
  4. AMD Radeon R9 290: Gallium3D vs. Catalyst Drivers
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Ondemand vs. Performance CPU Governing For AMD FX CPUs On Linux 3.17
  2. How Intel Graphics On Linux Compare To Open-Source AMD/NVIDIA Drivers
  3. The Fastest NVIDIA GPUs For Open-Source Nouveau With Steam Linux Gaming
  4. Testing For The Latest Linux Kernel Power Regression
Latest Linux News
  1. New Group Calls For Boycotting Systemd
  2. The Features To Find With The Imminent Release Of LLVM/Clang 3.5
  3. Borderlands 2 Is Coming To Linux
  4. The Witcher 2 Ups The Performance More & Works Around Catalyst Bug
  5. Running Gallium3D's LLVMpipe On The Eight-Core 5GHz CPU
  6. Trying Intel OpenCL On Linux For Video Encoding
  7. GSoC 2014 Yielded Some Improvements For Mesa/X.Org This Year
  8. webOS Lives On As LuneOS With New Release
  9. Marek Lands Radeon Gallium3D HyperZ Improvements
  10. Mozilla Firefox 32 Surfaces With HTML5, Developer Changes
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Lennart Poettering Talks Up His New Linux Vision That Involves Btrfs
  2. nv and xorg.conf under Debian PPC
  3. AMD graphics doesn't work with AMD Catalyst drivers
  4. Best Radeon for a Power Mac G5?
  5. The dangers of Linux kernel development
  6. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  7. AMD Releases UVD Video Decode Support For R600 GPUs
  8. SSD seems slow