1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

CentOS vs. Oracle vs. Scientific Linux 6.1 Performance

Michael Larabel

Published on 14 December 2011
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 6 - 6 Comments

While CentOS, Scientific Linux, and Oracle Linux Server are all derived from the same upstream source (Red Hat Enterprise Linux), how does the system performance compare between these RHEL derivatives? Here are some benchmarks of each of the 6.1 releases for Oracle Server, CentOS, and Scientific Linux, as they all do not perform the same.

After doing some Oracle Linux Server 6.1 testing over the weekend, I proceeded to install the recently released CentOS 6.1 and then Scientific Linux 6.1 to see how the performance of these Linux operating systems based upon Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.1 compare in terms of performance. To some surprise, there are some noticeable performance differences in some tests.

All three RHEL derivatives were tested in their default configurations with the packages that ship with the OS installation by default. Being all based upon the same upstream source, this means that it is the Linux 2.6.32 kernel, Mesa 7.10, the GCC 4.4.5 compiler, and uses EXT4 by default as some of the key items worth noting. The 64-bit versions of Oracle Server 6.1, Scientific 6.1, and CentOS 6.1 were used.

Fedora 12/13 were also going to be tested since that's what Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 is partially based upon, but those releases were not compatible with the hardware used in this article. If there is sufficient interest generated from this article, I will run more RHEL-based Linux distribution tests on a greater variety of hardware and more workstation/server-class hardware and tests.

Testing was done via the Phoronix Test Suite 3.6-Arendal release.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Intel Launches The Core i7 5960X, Mighty Powerful Haswell-E CPUs
  2. AMD Radeon R9 290: Gallium3D vs. Catalyst Drivers
  3. AMD Radeon R9 290 Open-Source Driver Works, But Has A Ways To Go
  4. Trying The Configurable 45 Watt TDP With AMD's A10-7800 / A6-7400K
Latest Linux Articles
  1. The Fastest NVIDIA GPUs For Open-Source Nouveau With Steam Linux Gaming
  2. Testing For The Latest Linux Kernel Power Regression
  3. The Most Energy Efficient Radeon GPU For AMD Linux Gaming
  4. 20-Way Radeon Comparison With Open-Source Graphics For Steam On Linux Gaming
Latest Linux News
  1. Intel Beignet Is Working Out Surprisingly Well For OpenCL On Linux
  2. Coreboot Adds Lenovo X220 With Native Sandy Bridge Support
  3. Canonical Has Yet To Land X.Org Server 1.16 For Ubuntu 14.10
  4. Imagination Launches A MIPS Development Board
  5. Getting Involved With The New Raspberry Pi Graphics Driver
  6. A New AMD Catalyst Linux Driver Unofficially Surfaces
  7. LibreOffice Ported To 64-bit ARM (AArch64)
  8. Enlightenment E19 RC3 Shows Off The New Wayland Compositor
  9. Metro Redux Is Going To Require OpenGL 4.x On Linux
  10. Jailhouse v0.1 Released As A Basic Hypervisor For Linux
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Btrfs Gets Talked Up, Googler Encourages You To Try Btrfs
  2. Updated graphics drivers for Ubuntu 12.04 Precise LTS
  3. Catalyst 14.201.1008
  4. It's Now Possible To Play Netflix Natively On Linux Without Wine Plug-Ins
  5. Users defect to Linux as OpenBSD removes Lynx from base system
  6. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  7. Canonical Joined The Khronos Group To Help Mir/Wayland Drivers
  8. Radeon HD5670 and Ubuntu 14.04