1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

OpenSUSE 11.3 Netbook Benchmarks

Michael Larabel

Published on 16 July 2010
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 4 - 9 Comments

Following yesterday's release of openSUSE 11.3 we tested this updated Linux operating system that's sponsored by Novell on an Intel Atom netbook and compared the performance to that of Ubuntu 10.04 LTS and Fedora 13. Here are the results.

The netbook being used for the testing of these three desktop Linux distributions from clean installations was the Samsung NC10 with its Intel Atom N270 CPU, 2GB of system memory, Intel 945 integrated graphics, a 32GB OCZ Core Series SSD, and a 1024 x 600 display panel. OpenSUSE 11.3 was run with its stock Linux 2.6.34-12-default i686 kernel, GNOME 2.30.0 desktop, X.Org Server 1.8.0, xf86-video-intel 2.12.0, Mesa 7.8.2, GCC 4.5, and an EXT4 file-system. Again, Ubuntu 10.04 LTS ships with the Linux 2.6.32 kernel, GNOME 2.30.0, X.Org Server 1.7.6, xf86-video-intel 2.9.1, Mesa 7.7.1, GCC 4.4.3, and an EXT4 file-system. Lastly, Fedora 13 has the Linux 2.6.33 kernel, GNOME 2.30.0 desktop, X.Org Server 1.8.0, xf86-video-intel 2.11.0, Mesa 7.8.1, GCC 4.4.4, and also an EXT4 file-system by default. A variety of tests were run via the Phoronix Test Suite and its netbook suite.

Starting right away with Tremulous, openSUSE 11.3 was faster than Ubuntu and Fedora. In fact, openSUSE 11.3 was 30% faster than Ubuntu 10.04 LTS! However, openSUSE 11.3 has the most recent Mesa 7.8.2 stable release where as Ubuntu's Lucid Lynx had shipped with the older Mesa 7.7 series so it does not have the most recent Mesa Intel DRI driver. Fedora 13, which has a graphics stack closer to openSUSE 11.3, performed more closely.

The LAME MP3 encoding performance was not in favor of openSUSE 11.3, but it was faster with Ubuntu 10.04 and Fedora 13. This may be due to a GCC 4.5 regression.

The x264 video encoding performance was close between the three tested Linux operating systems on the netbook.

Latest Articles & Reviews
  1. Intel Broadwell HD Graphics 5500: Windows 8.1 vs. Linux
  2. Linux Benchmarks Of NVIDIA's Early 2015 GeForce Line-Up
  3. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960: A Great $200 GPU For Linux Gamers
  4. Disk Encryption Tests On Fedora 21
  5. Xonotic 0.8 Performance With The Open-Source AMD/NVIDIA Gallium3D Drivers
  6. Many Linux Desktop 2D Benchmarks Of NVIDIA vs. AMD Drivers
Latest Linux News
  1. How To Use GCC 5's OpenMP & OpenACC Offloading Support
  2. Linux Users Upset By Chromium's Busted HiDPI Support
  3. BPF Backend Merged Into LLVM To Make Use Of New Kernel Functionality
  4. Dying Light Is Headed To Linux, SteamOS
  5. Wayland 1.6.1 & Weston 1.6.1 Released
  6. Mesa 10.4.3 Brings A Bunch Of Fixes For The Direct3D "Nine" Support
  7. Intel Has A Few More Graphics Changes For The Linux 3.20 Kernel
  8. Gummiboot Gains PE File Searching Support To Find Linux Kernels
  9. Wine 1.7.35 Starts Working On OpenGL Core Context Support
  10. X.Org Server 1.17 Pre-Release "TimTam" Is Out
Most Viewed News This Week
  1. Windows 10 To Be A Free Upgrade: What Linux Users Need To Know
  2. CoreOS Moves From Btrfs To EXT4 + OverlayFS
  3. Google Admin Encourages Trying Btrfs, Not ZFS On Linux
  4. TraceFS: The Newest Linux File-System
  5. Mozilla's Servo Still On Track For 2015 Alpha Release
  6. Fedora 23 Likely To Pursue Wayland By Default
  7. My Initial Intel Broadwell Linux Experience With The ThinkPad X1 Carbon
  8. Keith Packard Leaves Intel's Linux Graphics Work