1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Even With Re-Clocking, Nouveau Remains Behind NVIDIA's Proprietary Linux Driver

Michael Larabel

Published on 28 July 2014
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 5 - 16 Comments

Starting out the last week of July's Linux benchmarking on Phoronix is a fresh comparison of several NVIDIA GeForce graphics cards when comparing the performance of the latest open-source Nouveau driver against the latest NVIDIA proprietary Linux graphics driver. While the Kepler cards now support GPU re-clocking, the results aren't quite ideal yet.

For testing the open-source Nouveau driver stack we used the Linux 3.16 development kernel on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS x86_64 with the Oibaf PPA to provide Mesa 10.3-devel and other updated user-space components. With Linux 3.16 there is basic Nouveau re-clocking support for Kepler. As covered in that earlier article for re-clocking GeForce 600/700 series hardware, for most Kepler GPUs the Nouveau DRM can't currently re-clock to the highest performance state (0f) but is generally limited to a mid-range state like 0a. The only graphics card tested that could fully re-clock was the GeForce GTX 650 while the other GPUs would cause problems when attempting the highest performance state.

The proprietary driver used for testing was the fresh NVIDIA 340.24 release while also pulling back the kernel version (but keeping the same configuration) for managing compatibility with the NVIDIA (and AMD Catalyst, with the other upcoming results) proprietary drivers. The same system configuration and other components were used throughout testing. The graphics cards tested included:

- MSI GeForce 9800GT 512MB
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- eVGA GeForce GT 520 1024MB
- Zotac GeForce GT 610 1024MB
- MSI GeForce GTX 650 1024MB
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2048MB
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 2048MB

All of the OpenGL benchmarking was handled by the Phoronix Test Suite. For those interested in a comparison of the performance-per-Watt and power consumption as tested this weekend for the open-source drivers, the separate open vs. closed thermal/power efficiency article will be published in the coming days. The Radeon Gallium3D vs. AMD Catalyst Linux comparison is also being worked on for publishing this week.

Latest Articles & Reviews
  1. Samsung 850 EVO SSD Linux Benchmarks
  2. Kubuntu 15.04 Is Turning Out Quite Nice, Good Way To Try Out The Latest KDE
  3. 5-Way Linux Distribution Comparison On The Core i3 NUC
  4. OCZ ARC 100 Linux SSD Benchmarks
  5. Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Works Great As A Linux Ultrabook
  6. Transcend SSD370 256GB
Latest Linux News
  1. Linux 4.0 & LLVM vs. GCC Yielded Much Interest This Month
  2. XBMC/Kodi 15.0 Alpha 1 Released
  3. Xfce 4.12 Released After Nearly Three Years Of Work
  4. The Khronos Group Filed A Trademark On "Vulkan" API
  5. Mozilla Thunderbird Adoption Climbs, Thunderbird 38 In May
  6. The Most Popular Linux Benchmark Results On OpenBenchmarking.org
  7. Intel's Graphics Driver For Linux 4.1 Will Have More XenGT vGPU Support
  8. PlayOnLinux 4.2.6 Fixes A Number Of Issues
  9. Mesa 10.5-RC3 Now Available To Test Improved GPU Drivers
  10. New Specifications On The Alleged Ubuntu Tablet
Most Viewed News This Week
  1. Linux 4.0-RC1 Tagged, Linux 4.0 Will Bring Many Notable Improvements
  2. Screenshots Of The GNOME 3.16 Changes
  3. More Proof That Allwinner Is Violating The GPL
  4. Linux 4.0 Doesn't Have The Weirdest Codename
  5. The Tremendous Features Of Fedora 22
  6. Krita 2.9 Released, Their Biggest Release Ever
  7. A Single UEFI Executable With The Linux Kernel, Initrd & Command Line
  8. Canonical Comes Up With Its Own FUSE Filesystem For Linux Containers
%%CLICK_URL_UNESC%%