1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking Benchmarking Platform
Phoromatic Test Orchestration

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680: Windows 7 vs. Ubuntu 12.04 Linux

Michael Larabel

Published on 16 May 2012
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 4 - 24 Comments

Following up on the performance comparison earlier this month of comparing Intel Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge graphics between Windows and Linux, up today are the results of a comparison of Windows 7 to Ubuntu 12.04 LTS when using a NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 "Kepler" graphics card.

For the most part the Intel Linux graphics performance struggled against the latest Intel graphics driver for Windows 6 x64. However, unlike Intel, NVIDIA (and AMD) maintain a largely shared code-base between operating systems for their official proprietary drivers. The open-source drivers for Radeon/Nouveau are, of course, a different story but that is not what is being compared here since they easily lose to the official proprietary drivers in terms of features and performance. This article is showing the results from a GeForce GTX 680 when using the official drivers for each platform. On the Linux side, this meant the NVIDIA 295.40 while on the Windows side it was their 301.34 release.

NVIDIA GeForce graphics comparisons between Windows and Linux have been done in the past on Phoronix such as here and here. However, since then new hardware has come, the drivers have evolved, and there has been new Linux releases too. This is a fresh look at things on the NVIDIA GeForce side with the GTX 680 Kepler. AMD Radeon HD 7950 "Southern Islands" results between Linux and Windows are forthcoming.

Each OS was left in its stock configuration along with the relevant graphics driver settings. The Phoronix Test Suite carried out the tests on both operating systems. All hardware was maintained the same throughout testing. The test profiles used were the ones that could be natively executed under each platform, utilize OpenGL, and the quality of the versions for each operating system is known to be equivalent.

This testing is quite straight forward so we can immediately move to the results.

Latest Articles & Reviews
  1. Sub-$20 802.11n USB WiFi Adapter That's Linux Friendly
  2. The Lenovo T450s Is Working Beautifully With Linux
  3. Linux 4.0 SSD EXT4 / Btrfs / XFS / F2FS Benchmarks
  4. Linux 4.0 Hard Drive Comparison With Six File-Systems
  5. Lenovo ThinkPad T450s Broadwell Preview
  6. How Open-Source Allowed Valve To Implement VULKAN Much Faster On The Source 2 Engine
Latest Linux News
  1. Linux-Powered Endless Computer Raises $100k+ In A Few Days
  2. GCC 5.1 RC2 Arrives, GCC 5.1 Planned For Next Week
  3. F2FS For Linux 4.1 Has New Features & Fixes
  4. Phoronix Server Upgrade This Weekend: Dual Haswell Xeons, 96GB DDR4
  5. Google's Experimental QUIC Transport Protocol Is Showing Promise
  6. Red Hat Joins Khronos, The Group Behind OpenGL & Vulkan
  7. NetworkManager Drops WiMAX Support
  8. Wine 1.7.41 Works More On Kernel Job Objects, MSI Patches
  9. Linux 4.1 Has Improvements For The Multi-Queue Block Layer
  10. X.Org Looks To Have Six Summer Projects
Most Viewed News This Week
  1. Nouveau: NVIDIA's New Hardware Is "VERY Open-Source Unfriendly"
  2. Linux 4.0 Kernel Released
  3. Microsoft Announces An LLVM-Based Compiler For .NET
  4. Linux 4.1 Brings Many Potentially Risky x86/ASM Changes
  5. Encryption Support For EXT4
  6. VirtualBox 5.0 Beta 2 Released
  7. Mozilla Start Drafting Plans To Deprecate Insecure HTTP
  8. KDBUS Is Taking A Lot Of Heat, Might Be Delayed From Mainline Linux Kernel