1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Multi-Core, Multi-OS Scaling Performance

Michael Larabel

Published on 21 February 2011
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 2 of 6 - 28 Comments

Starting with measuring the time it took for GCC 4.5.1 to build PHP on each of the four operating systems, Fedora 14 was the strong leader. When only using one and two of the Gulftown cores, all four operating systems ran nearly identical, but when using 3/4/6/6+HT cores, Fedora 14 pulled a dramatic finish. CentOS 5.5, PC-BSD, and OpenIndiana all scaled close to the same. The PC-BSD 8.1 performance had dipped when three and four cores were used, compared to CentOS and OpenIndiana, which is the beginning of a trend better illustrated in some of the later test results. Without trouble though, Fedora 14 scaled the best when compiling PHP.

The build-apache test profile had not worked with PC-BSD and OpenIndiana, but between CentOS 5.5 and Fedora 14, the Linux 2.6.35-using OS scaled much better. While not the focus of testing in this article, when Intel Hyper Threading was enabled on the Gulftown processor, the benefits of doubling the number of available CPU threads was not linear or nearly as great when scaling from two cores to four cores or three cores to six cores.

With the multi-threaded C-Ray ray-tracing benchmark, the performance between CentOS, Fedora, PC-BSD, and OpenIndiana were identical when the results were normalized against their single-core performance. However, the results did differ when it came to flipping on Hyper Threading. The Core i7 970 with Hyper Threading did dramatically better under OpenIndiana (it was near linear) than it did when Hyper Threading was flipped on in CentOS, Fedora, and PC-BSD where it was of limited benefit.

Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Gigabyte AM1M-S2H
  2. AMD's New Athlon/Semprons Give Old Phenom CPUs A Big Run For The Money
  3. 13-Way Low-End GPU Comparison With AMD's AM1 Athlon
  4. ASUS AM1I-A: A Mini-ITX Board For Socketed Kabini APUs
Latest Linux Articles
  1. How Much Video RAM Is Needed For Catalyst R3 Graphics?
  2. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS vs. 14.04 LTS Cloud Benchmarks
  3. Ubuntu 12.04.4 vs. 13.10 vs. 14.04 LTS Desktop Benchmarks
  4. AMD OpenCL Performance With AM1 Kabini APUs
Latest Linux News
  1. Oracle Linux 6.5 vs. Oracle Linux 7.0 Beta Benchmarks
  2. Easter Yields The Linux 3.15-rc2 Kernel Release
  3. The Most Amazing OpenGL Tech Demo In 64kb
  4. Packard Bell LM85 Now Supported By Coreboot
  5. AmazonBasics External USB 2.0 DVD Writer For Linux
  6. TP-LINK TG-3468: A $12 Linux PCI-E Gigabit Network Adapter
  7. Linux 3.15 Lands Some DRM Graphics Driver Fixes
  8. AMD Is Disabling DPM Support For RV770 GPUs
  9. ReactOS Working On A Community Windows OS
  10. eRacks Keeps Pushing Linux, Open-Source Systems After 15 Years
  11. Borderlands Is Being Considered For Linux
  12. Mesa 10.0 & 10.1 Stable Get Updated
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. ReactOS Working On A Community Windows OS
  2. The GNOME Foundation Is Running Short On Money
  3. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  4. Catalyst 14.3 Beta
  5. Suggestions about how to make a Radeon HD 7790 work decently?
  6. Radeon 8000M problematic on Linux?
  7. Linux Kernel Developers Fed Up With Ridiculous Bugs In Systemd
  8. After Jack Keane, RuseSoft will briing Ankh 3 to Linux through Desura