1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Why Mono Is Desirable For Linux

Ciprian Khlud

Published on 14 September 2012
Written by Ciprian Khlud
Page 2 of 2 - 314 Comments

Do you know what? I still have the tools like Visual Studio that my company offers. With paid plugins (which sadly are not opensource), you are more productive than most of the environments said before. Some are getting close(r) (I talk here mostly about Java tools, which are really great like IntelliJ IDEA, Eclipse and NetBeans, and to not forget QtCreator), but still a developer as myself, doing all day C#, will do best C#. And if I have free time and I can make an application with C# and target Gtk#, and see if it compiles in MonoDevelop for Windows, it will mostly work on Linux. I don't have to write fancy Linux/Windows codes.

Another reason why is desirable to use C#, is that, without wanting to give specific numbers, C# tends to be faster to write, and in practice, the speed of the application you cannot see it slower, without a stopwatch. If an application is profiled in C#, and even Mono offers a primitive profiler, on Windows I do recommend using SharpDevelop that it has a visual pie-like profiler, you can get really speedy applications. Some people complain on GC, that you can have "visual glitches because GC hits", after you open a file, an operation that the user expects that it can take some time, the program can do a silent full GC. If the user does a small operation, like changing the color of a note, clearing the generation zero GC, is imperceptible for most users (on a phone takes like 3-4 ms, on a desktop machine is in 1 ms range) and make that GC pauses are less frequent. Those kinds of tricks for performance driven code, and what user expects are in fact on any language, platforms. Constant references are recommended and used widely in Qt APIs to give a good performance and the C++ compiler can optimize better based on this information.

Part 2 - Worst Case Scenario

Let's say in 3 years from now, company X attacks Xamarin or Mono project about an obscure patent claim that states that an operation in your program is not allowed. In this hypothetic case, the way you save the notes, they are saved using a future API that can save the notes as they are based on an annotation [Serializable]. This would impact a lot of software in Mono. But as trials are, they will likely attack Xamarin, not my software. Which is the outcome? Xamarin will start the legal battle that will take time. Even if I will be 100% sure that Xamarin it will lose and it will remove this specific functionality, nothing stops me to find another opensource project that does the salvation of the data in different format (to not rewrite by myself). That's it.

What it would be more strange, it would be that sometimes some operations (like Entity Framework, discussed in a separate post, that do use annotations to store everything in a database) are known for most database developers how to do it (maybe in a less efficient way) for close to a decade, so the impact of removing Entity tomorrow from Mono will impact a little the software that works with a database, as they would need to rewrite this functionality by themselves. In a repetitive way, of course, but not out of reach.

The issue is at least for Free/OSS not paid developers is:

- How can I invest my free time to create software a person can use?

- Which tool can give the end-user experience that user expects? Is it Gtk?

More things about the author: Ciprian Khlud it is a Senion Software Engineer who writes code using C#, little Delphi, legacy code in VB6, etc. at Litera Corp, a company specialized in Legal Documents Software.

Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. AMD Launches New FX CPUs, Cuts Prices On Existing Processors
  2. Preview: AMD's FX-9590 Eight-Core At Up To 5.0GHz On Linux
  3. Intel Launches The Core i7 5960X, Mighty Powerful Haswell-E CPUs
  4. AMD Radeon R9 290: Gallium3D vs. Catalyst Drivers
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Ondemand vs. Performance CPU Governing For AMD FX CPUs On Linux 3.17
  2. How Intel Graphics On Linux Compare To Open-Source AMD/NVIDIA Drivers
  3. The Fastest NVIDIA GPUs For Open-Source Nouveau With Steam Linux Gaming
  4. Testing For The Latest Linux Kernel Power Regression
Latest Linux News
  1. Borderlands 2 Is Coming To Linux
  2. The Witcher 2 Ups The Performance More & Works Around Catalyst Bug
  3. Running Gallium3D's LLVMpipe On The Eight-Core 5GHz CPU
  4. Trying Intel OpenCL On Linux For Video Encoding
  5. GSoC 2014 Yielded Some Improvements For Mesa/X.Org This Year
  6. webOS Lives On As LuneOS With New Release
  7. Marek Lands Radeon Gallium3D HyperZ Improvements
  8. Mozilla Firefox 32 Surfaces With HTML5, Developer Changes
  9. Nouveau X.Org Driver Released With DRI3+Present, Maxwell, GLAMOR
  10. Microsoft & AMD Release C++ AMP Compiler With Linux Support
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Lennart Poettering Talks Up His New Linux Vision That Involves Btrfs
  2. nv and xorg.conf under Debian PPC
  3. AMD graphics doesn't work with AMD Catalyst drivers
  4. Best Radeon for a Power Mac G5?
  5. The dangers of Linux kernel development
  6. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  7. AMD Releases UVD Video Decode Support For R600 GPUs
  8. SSD seems slow