1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Building A 96-Core Ubuntu ARM Solar-Powered Cluster

Michael Larabel

Published on 19 June 2012
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 3 - 14 Comments

Last week I shared results from the Phoronix 12-core ARM Linux mini cluster that was constructed out of six PandaBoard ES development boards. Over the weekend, a 96-core ARM cluster succeeded this build. While packing nearly 100 cores and running Ubuntu Linux, the power consumption was just a bit more than 200 Watts. This array of nearly 100 processor cores was even powered up by a solar panel.

This past weekend I was out at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) where this build took place. A massive ARM build out has been in the plans for a few months and to even get it running off a solar panel. The build was a success and by Sunday, the goals were realized.

Due to my past ARM Linux benchmarking on Phoronix that they have followed, their use of the Phoronix Test Suite, and my experience with Linux benchmarking and performance testing in general, I was invited over to MIT to help with this 96-core ARM build after having collaborated with them for a few months. This cluster / super-computer was built around 48 PandaBoards.

The bulk of the PandaBoards were not the ES model (I brought my collection of PandaBoard ES models as back-ups for the PandaBoard nodes that failed), but just the vanilla model. The non-ES model packs a Texas Instruments OMAP4430 with a dual-core 1.0GHz dual-core Cortex-A9 processor. The GPU and CPU of the PandaBoard ES with its OMAP4460 are at higher clock speeds, but aside from that it is very similar to the OMAP4430 model.

For maximum density and to make it easier to transport, the PandaBoards ended up being stacked vertically. The enclosure for the 48 PandaBoards was an industrial trashcan. Rather than using AC adapters, the PandaBoards were running off a USB power source. The power consumption on the original PandaBoard is similar to that of the PandaBoard ES or perhaps slightly lower when using the more efficient USB power source. My PandaBoard ES testing usually indicates about a 3 Watt idle per board, 5 Watt under load, or 6 Watts under extreme load. This MIT 96-core cluster would idle at just under 170 Watts and for the loads we hit it with over the weekend usually would just go a bit above 200 Watts.

Latest Articles & Reviews
  1. NVIDIA's $1000+ GeForce GTX TITAN X Delivers Maximum Linux Performance
  2. OS X 10.10 vs. Ubuntu 15.04 vs. Fedora 21 Tests: Linux Sweeps The Board
  3. The New Place Where Linux Code Is Constantly Being Benchmarked
  4. 18-GPU NVIDIA/AMD Linux Comparison Of BioShock: Infinite
  5. Phoronix Test Suite 5.6 Adds New Phoromatic Enterprise Benchmarking Features
  6. OpenGL Threaded Optimizations Responsible For NVIDIA's Faster Performance?
Latest Linux News
  1. Mesa's Android Support Is Currently In Bad Shape
  2. Wayland's Weston Terminal Can Now Be Minimized
  3. Phoronix - Working Towards Faster Page Loads
  4. Improved OpenCL Support For Blender's Cycles Renderer
  5. Mesa 10.5.2 Packs In A Handful Of Fixes
  6. More Fedora/Ubuntu Linux vs. OS X OpenGL Benchmarks
  7. Intel Adds Mesa IR To NIR Translator & Makes Other NIR Improvements
  8. HAMMER2 Gets A Man Page
  9. Kodi 14.2 Released To End Out The "XBMC" 14.x Series
  10. Debian 8.0 Jessie RC2 Installer Released
Most Viewed News This Week
  1. Introducing The Library Operating System For Linux
  2. Allwinner Continues Jerking Around The Open-Source Community
  3. AMD Is Hiring Two More Open-Source Linux GPU Driver Developers
  4. Systemd Change Allows For Stateless Systems With Tmpfs
  5. GNOME Shell & Mutter 3.16.0 Released
  6. GNU Nano 2.4.0 Brings Complete Undo System, Linter Support & More
  7. GNOME 3.16 Released: It's Their Best Release Yet
  8. Red Hat Is Rolling Out A VirtIO DRM/KMS GPU Driver