1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Initial Findings: MeeGo 1.1 Netbook vs. Ubuntu 10.10 Netbook

Michael Larabel

Published on 5 November 2010
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 2 - 15 Comments

Intel and Nokia last week rolled out MeeGo 1.1, which is now officially available for Intel Atom netbooks, the N900 handset, and in-vehicle "infotainment" systems. The netbook spin of MeeGo 1.1 is out there to compete with the likes of Ubuntu 10.10 Netbook Edition, which was released just shy of a month ago. While nothing radically has changed with MeeGo 1.1 compared to the initial MeeGo 1.0 release from earlier this year, the software stack is updated so for the past few days we have begun conducting a performance comparison between MeeGo 1.1 and Ubuntu 10.10 Netbook. Here are some of our initial findings.

These initial tests are coming from a Samsung NC10 netbook with an Intel Atom N270 1.60GHz CPU with a 945GME + ICH7-M motherboard providing the Intel 945 integrated graphics. This Intel netbook had 2GB of system memory and a 32GB OCZ Core Solid-State Drive. For reference in this comparison, MeeGo 1.1 has the Linux 2.6.35-3-10.3-netbook i686 kernel, X.Org Server 1.9.0, xf86-video-intel 2.12.0, Mesa 7.9-devel, GCC 4.5.0, and uses a Btrfs file-system. Ubuntu 10.10 Netbook ships with the Linux 2.6.35-22-generic i686 kernel, X.Org Server 1.9.0, xf86-video-intel 2.12.0, Mesa 7.9.0, GCC 4.4.5, and an EXT4 file-system.

To begin with, Bootchart was used to compare the boot speeds of both Ubuntu 10.10 Netbook and MeeGo 1.1 Netbook. On the Samsung NC10, the reported boot time was 12.92 seconds under MeeGo 1.1 while with Ubuntu 10.10 the boot time came in at 17.52 seconds.

Not only was MeeGo 1.1 quicker at booting, but at least when it comes to idling at its default shell, it also consumed less power than Ubuntu 10.10 Netbook with the Samsung NC10. On this Atom netbook the MeeGo 1.1 average power consumption was 11.615 Watts while with Ubuntu 10.10 it was 12.745 Watts, which is nearly a 10% increase in power consumption over MeeGo when it comes to idling. We will also have more power consumption numbers under different usage scenarios when we do our full-length performance review of MeeGo 1.1, Ubuntu 10.10 Netbook, and earlier releases for both projects.

We also ran a few benchmarks from the Phoronix Test Suite to provide some quick performance figures. These netbook-focused tests included OpenArena, LAME MP3 encoding, PostMark, and unpacking the compressed Linux kernel source-code package.

MeeGo 1.1, which is using a development copy of the Mesa 7.9 release rather than the final 7.9.0 release, was not quite as fast as Ubuntu 10.10 when running the OpenArena game at the netbook's native panel resolution. The difference though was only by two frames per second and neither Linux distribution on this hardware is capable of running this ioquake3 game at a decent frame-rate with the current state of Intel's classic Mesa 3D driver.

Cut down your 70-515 exam stress by using our latest and most recent pass4sure 70-647 online courses and the best quality 642-973 exam tutorials.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Trying The Configurable 45 Watt TDP With AMD's A10-7800 / A6-7400K
  2. Sumo's Omni Gets Reloaded
  3. AMD A10-7800 & A6-7400K APUs Run Great On Linux
  4. Radeon Gallium3D Is Running Increasingly Well Against AMD's Catalyst Driver
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Open-Source Radeon Graphics Have Some Improvements On Linux 3.17
  2. CPUFreq Scaling Tests With AMD's Kaveri On Linux 3.16
  3. Enabling HyperZ Is Still An Easy Way For Faster RadeonSI Performance
  4. AMD Kaveri: Catalyst vs. RadeonSI Gallium3D On Linux
Latest Linux News
  1. GNOME 3.14 Beta Makes GLSL Optional, Supports Wayland Gesture/Touch Events
  2. KDE Software Compilation 4.14 Released
  3. The Many Things You Can Build With A Raspberry Pi
  4. AMD's Catalyst Linux Driver Preparing For A World Without An X Server?
  5. Khronos Publishes Its Slides About OpenGL-Next
  6. Qt5 Will Now Support LGPLv3 Modules
  7. Proposed: A Tainted Performance State For The Linux Kernel
  8. Systemd 216 Piles On More Features, Aims For New User-Space VT
  9. Mesa 10.2.6 Has Plenty Of OpenGL Driver Bug Fixes
  10. LXQt 0.8 Is Being Released Soon
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Remote gui not accessible in Phoronix Test Suite 5.2
  2. The dangers of Linux kernel development
  3. Dead Island for Linux (?)
  4. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  5. AMD Offers Mantle For OpenGL-Next, Pushes Mantle To Workstations
  6. Next-Gen OpenGL To Be Announced Next Month
  7. OpenGL 4.5 Released With New Features
  8. Updated graphics drivers for Ubuntu 12.04 Precise LTS