1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking Benchmarking Platform
Phoromatic Test Orchestration

Mac OS X 10.6.3 vs. Windows 7 vs. Ubuntu 10.04 Benchmarks

Michael Larabel

Published on 9 May 2010
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 3 of 5 - 72 Comments

While still based upon the ioquake3 engine, the Urban Terror test has proven to be slightly more demanding than OpenArena, but still the story was much the same in regards to how the three operating systems and two systems had shaken out. On the Mac Mini with NVIDIA graphics, Windows 7 was significantly faster than both Ubuntu 10.04 and Mac OS X 10.6.3. At its peak, Windows 7 was 68% faster than Ubuntu 10.04 LTS and at that point, it was 3.7x faster than Mac OS X 10.6.3.

However, unlike OpenArena, with Urban Terror, Ubuntu 10.04 LTS was generally faster than Mac OS X 10.6.3 -- even with Intel graphics. Unfortunately, however, that may be due to some of the OpenGL changes (regressions) within the newest Mac OS X 10.6.3 update.

With Nexuiz, Microsoft Windows 7 continues to be the fastest operating system with the Mac Mini boasting NVIDIA GeForce 9400M graphics and the 2GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor. However, between Ubuntu 10.04 LTS and Windows 7 Professional there was not a very significant difference, similar to our close numbers from the six systems we benchmarked last week. Windows 7 was usually just a couple percentage points faster than Ubuntu 10.04 with Nexuiz. The performance of the NVIDIA graphics in Nexuiz was meanwhile devastating for Apple. In fact, at some resolutions, the frame-rate on the newer Mac Mini was actually worse for Mac OS X than on the older Mac Mini with Intel graphics. Nexuiz is one of the areas that have regressed for NVIDIA with the Mac OS X 10.6.3 update.

There was also the usual trend of the Intel Mac OS X driver performance trouncing that of the Intel Linux graphics driver stack. Apple's Intel OpenGL driver is much faster than the Linux Mesa stack and Mac OS X leverages LLVM (the Low-Level Virtual Machine) for shader optimization and other routines as talked about in other Phoronix articles. On average, the Mac Mini with Intel GMA 950 graphics was 2.7x faster when running Mac OS X 10.6.3 than Ubuntu 10.04 LTS.

Latest Articles & Reviews
  1. GLAMOR + RadeonSI 2D Acceleration Is Quite Good For Open-Source AMD 2D Performance
  2. AMD Radeon R9 290 OpenGL On Ubuntu 15.04: Catalyst vs. RadeonSI Gallium3D
  3. Ubuntu 15.04 Offers Faster OpenGL For AMD Radeon GPUs On Open-Source
  4. Ubuntu 15.04 Brings Some Graphics Performance Improvements For Intel Haswell
  5. Sub-$20 802.11n USB WiFi Adapter That's Linux Friendly
  6. The Lenovo T450s Is Working Beautifully With Linux
Latest Linux News
  1. Ubuntu 15.10's "W" Codename Being Revealed Soon
  2. The Six X.Org Summer GSoC Projects For 2015
  3. Linux 4.1-RC2 Kernel Released
  4. GNOME 3.17.1 Released
  5. A Lot Of Improvements Are Coming For Mir 0.13, Including Work Towards Libinput
  6. Mobile Optimizations Coming For Phoronix
  7. Wayland 1.8 Alpha Release Delayed
  8. Godot Game Engine 1.1 Up To RC State
  9. ATI Rage128 Driver Now Has RandR Support
  10. Microsoft's Visual C++ Team Is Improving Clang For Windows
Most Viewed News This Week
  1. Trying Out Microsoft Visual Studio Code On Linux
  2. Microsoft Releases New Code IDE For Linux!
  3. Improvements On The Way For GNOME's Nautilus File Manager
  4. Kodi 15.0 Beta 1 Released
  5. GCC 4.9.2 vs. GCC 5 Benchmarks On An Intel Xeon Haswell
  6. QEMU 2.3 Officially Released
  7. Mono 4.0 Makes Use Of Microsoft's Open-Source Code, C# 6.0
  8. Debian GNU/Hurd 2015 Released