1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Ubuntu 10.04 Is More Power Hungry Than Windows 7

Michael Larabel

Published on 4 May 2010
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 2 - 85 Comments

Yesterday we published our first benchmarks of Windows 7 vs. Ubuntu 10.04 that provided an initial look at the OpenGL graphics performance between these two operating systems on six different systems. Today we are continuing to compare the two operating systems as we look at the power consumption of Ubuntu and Windows on a netbook and notebook.

Today's testing is much simpler than yesterday's tests and benchmarking currently being carried out for future comparisons. We simply monitored the power consumption of a notebook and netbook when each operating system was idling at their respective desktops with all default settings and software left for each OS. For an accurate, multi-platform comparison, we monitored the AC power consumption of the netbook and notebook using a SeaSonic Power Meter. We not only looked at the pure "out of the box" experience for Windows 7 and Ubuntu 10.04, but also measured the numbers a second time once we installed the proprietary graphics driver on each operating system that offer better power management support under each platform.

The netbook used for testing was an ASUS Eee PC 1201N with an Atom 330 dual-core CPU, NVIDIA GeForce 9400M ION graphics, 2GB of RAM, a 12.1-inch WXGA display, and a 250GB 5400RPM SATA HDD. The notebook was a Lenovo ThinkPad T61 with an Intel Core 2 Duo T9300, a NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M, 4GB of system memory, a 15.4-inch display, and a 100GB Hitachi 7200RPM SATA HDD. Ubuntu 10.04 LTS x86_64 and Microsoft Windows 7 Professional x64 were the two operating systems tested on the two mobile devices.

When installing the NVIDIA proprietary driver on Windows it was the 197.16 notebook driver and under Linux it was the NVIDIA 195.36.15 driver.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Intel Launches The Core i7 5960X, Mighty Powerful Haswell-E CPUs
  2. AMD Radeon R9 290: Gallium3D vs. Catalyst Drivers
  3. AMD Radeon R9 290 Open-Source Driver Works, But Has A Ways To Go
  4. Trying The Configurable 45 Watt TDP With AMD's A10-7800 / A6-7400K
Latest Linux Articles
  1. The Fastest NVIDIA GPUs For Open-Source Nouveau With Steam Linux Gaming
  2. Testing For The Latest Linux Kernel Power Regression
  3. The Most Energy Efficient Radeon GPU For AMD Linux Gaming
  4. 20-Way Radeon Comparison With Open-Source Graphics For Steam On Linux Gaming
Latest Linux News
  1. Coreboot Adds Lenovo X220 With Native Sandy Bridge Support
  2. Canonical Has Yet To Land X.Org Server 1.16 For Ubuntu 14.10
  3. Imagination Launches A MIPS Development Board
  4. Getting Involved With The New Raspberry Pi Graphics Driver
  5. A New AMD Catalyst Linux Driver Unofficially Surfaces
  6. LibreOffice Ported To 64-bit ARM (AArch64)
  7. Enlightenment E19 RC3 Shows Off The New Wayland Compositor
  8. Metro Redux Is Going To Require OpenGL 4.x On Linux
  9. Jailhouse v0.1 Released As A Basic Hypervisor For Linux
  10. Google's Chromebook "Samus" Now Supported By Coreboot
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Btrfs Gets Talked Up, Googler Encourages You To Try Btrfs
  2. Catalyst 14.201.1008
  3. It's Now Possible To Play Netflix Natively On Linux Without Wine Plug-Ins
  4. Users defect to Linux as OpenBSD removes Lynx from base system
  5. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  6. Canonical Joined The Khronos Group To Help Mir/Wayland Drivers
  7. Radeon HD5670 and Ubuntu 14.04
  8. AMD Releases UVD Video Decode Support For R600 GPUs