1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Testing Out Linux File-Systems On A USB Flash Drive

Michael Larabel

Published on 11 November 2009
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 2 of 4 - 21 Comments

Starting with the simple SQLite test profile running on the Corsair Flash Voyager GT 32GB, its performance was best with the EXT4 file-system. Just behind EXT4 though in terms of performance was EXT3 and then slightly behind that was ReiserFS followed by XFS. The Btrfs file-system on this flash drive performed two-and-a-half times worse than the EXT3/EXT4/XFS/ReiserFS file-systems. While the Btrfs file-system performed poorly, FAT32 actually did much worse. It took over 1400 seconds (or over 23 minutes) to run this SQLite database insertion test from the Flash Voyager GT, in comparison to Btrfs that took just under 15 minutes, or about five minutes for the other file-systems. There is quite the spread in results with the SQLite performance across the file-systems.

While most would not be running a mail server off a USB flash drive, for which the PostMark test profile simulates, but here the best performance was found with EXT4. EXT4 had a substantial advantage over FAT32, EXT3, XFS, and ReiserFS. With PostMark, Btrfs actually was in second place in terms of the quantitative performance. With this test, the FAT32 file-system was not far behind EXT3.

Next, we looked at the drive's write performance through IOzone with a 2GB file-size. The results were quite spread out, but EXT4 again finished with the best performance. Using EXT4 the write speed was at 19.93MB/s while just behind that was XFS at 18.47MB/s and then FAT32 at 18.33MB/s. Not far behind though was the Btrfs 0.19 file-system at 17.32MB/s while ReiserFS and EXT3 were at 10MB/s and 7MB/s, respectively.

Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Overclocking The AMD AM1 Athlon & Sempron APUs
  2. AMD Athlon 5350 / 5150 & Sempron 3850 / 2650
  3. Upgraded Kernel & Mesa Yield A Big Boost For Athlon R3 Graphics
  4. AMD Athlon 5350 APU On Linux
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Are AMD Athlon/Sempron APUs Fast Enough For Steam On Linux?
  2. AMD Athlon's R3 Graphics: RadeonSI Gallium3D vs. Catalyst
  3. GCC 4.9 Compiler Optimization Benchmarks For Faster Binaries
  4. DDR3 Memory Scaling Performance With AMD's Athlon 5350
Latest Linux News
  1. Intel Broadwell GT3 Graphics Have Dual BSD Rings
  2. Early Linux 3.15 Benchmarks Of Intel Core i7 + Radeon
  3. Red Hat Releases Its RHEL 7 Release Candidate
  4. New Features Coming To Xubuntu 14.04 LTS
  5. NVIDIA Officially Releases CUDA 6
  6. Google Releases An AutoFDO Converter For Perf In LLVM
  7. Fedora 21 To Evaluate Remote Journal Logging, 64-bit ARM Emulation
  8. Star Citizen Will Be Coming To Linux
  9. Ubuntu 14.10 Convergence To Focus On Replacing Core Apps
  10. The Results Of Optimizing Radeon's VRAM Behavior
  11. Kernel Developers Discuss Improving Kernel Configurations
  12. Apple, LLVM Developers Figure Out Their 64-Bit ARM Approach
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. The GNOME Foundation Is Running Short On Money
  2. Linux Kernel Developers Fed Up With Ridiculous Bugs In Systemd
  3. Bye bye BSD, Hello Linux: A Sys Admin's Story
  4. New tool for undervolt/overclock AMD K8L and K10 processors
  5. How to enable opengl 3.3 on r9 270?
  6. R290x sound problems
  7. radeon-profile: tool for changing profiles and monitoring some GPU parameters
  8. Torvalds Is Unconvinced By LTO'ing A Linux Kernel