1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Mobile Users Beware: Linux Has Major Power Regression

Michael Larabel

Published on 22 April 2011
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 4 of 4 - 100 Comments

I would not be the least bit surprised if this regression is also hitting desktop and server Linux users too in making your systems less green. However, my only AC power meters do not have the ability to interface directly with the PC, so I am unable to check on their results without resorting to manually monitoring the meter's power display and thus no automatic Phoronix Test Suite monitoring.

As far as what commit is causing this very noticeable regression, that's unknown at the moment. While the Phoronix Test Suite can automatically bisect kernel regressions (and that in other software projects leveraging a version control system), and the Phoronix Test Suite natively supports sensor monitoring regardless of what's being tested (a feature that AMD's Tapper or Canonical's Abrek still lack), with this situation it's a bit harder than being able to have it be 100% automated due to needing to ensure the battery does not run out mid-test, among other reasons.

It's also time consuming from my current range of mobile devices with no longer having the System76 Sandy Bridge notebook around and Intel not yet having shipped a new Sandy Bridge notebook for the new Linux automated test farm. Depending upon interest level and potential ROI, this may end up being bisected to find the specific commit. I am just putting the information out here now as other kernel stakeholders can also likely reproduce this issue and bisect the problem if they so desire.

I'm also more than happy to show other organizations how to utilize the Phoronix Test Suite's sensor monitoring, its other extensible features, and integration with Phoromatic and OpenBenchmarking.org to detect this regression and other performance issues for the kernel. Or even for their own software projects and to do so in an automated manner either on a timed basis or per-commit for continuous integration. I will also be back in Munich, Nürnberg, and Frankfurt beginning late next week and then at UDS Budapest followed by the tail-end of Berlin LinuxTag if anyone would like me to happily demonstrate or to discuss Linux testing practices, etc. Let me know so that we can all improve this situation for Linux; clearly the status quo is insufficient if the problem's already been in one released kernel and is set to appear next week in Ubuntu 11.04.

More information to be published next week. More information will also likely come on my Twitter feed (where I usually break the news first) and then the Phoronix feed over the weekend as my investigation continues and stay tuned for the article on Monday with the complete set of results that led to the discovery of this regression that's been around for at least a few months.

UPDATE 1: Another test using the battery power usage test profile was carried out that monitors the battery usage when the system is again idling, idling while the display is turned off via DPMS, and then when the display is flipped back on and MPlayer is used to play a video clip. These results are uploaded to OpenBenchmarking.org and show that even when the display is off, the system is still consuming more power under the Linux 2.6.38 kernel, to eliminate any questions of whether the display backlight explains a power difference.

UPDATE 2: Disabling CPU power management / EIST from the BIOS doesn't seem to help.

UPDATE 3: The regression will be bisected this weekend via the Phoronix Test Suite stack. Any Phoronix findings should be published on Sunday or Monday.

UPDATE 4: The Tests Showing Ubuntu 11.04 On A Power Consumption Binge is the prequel to this testing showing all of the original Ubuntu 11.04 power consumption benchmarks as the first sign of this major power problem.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Scythe Mugen MAX
  2. Intel Core i7 5960X Haswell-E On Linux
  3. Intel 80GB 530 Series M.2 SSD On Linux
  4. With A New Motherboard, The Core i7 5960X Haswell-E Lights Up
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Intel P-State vs. CPUFreq Benchmarks On The i7-5960X
  2. RadeonSI GLAMOR Benchmarks With X.Org Server 1.16
  3. RadeonSI Gallium3D vs. Catalyst At 4K UHD On Linux
  4. MSAA RadeonSI Gallium3D Performance Preview
Latest Linux News
  1. X.Org Server Shatter Project Fails
  2. X.Org Women Outreach Program Only Turns Up Two Applicants So Far
  3. Fedora 21 Alpha Finally Coming Next Week
  4. Ubuntu Touch/Phone Reaches Its First RTM Image
  5. The KMS Mode-Setting Driver Was Imported For X.Org Server 1.17
  6. SNA & UXA Intel Benchmarks With X.Org Server 1.16
  7. Graphics Driver Changes Coming In The Linux 3.18 Kernel
  8. Tropico 5 Being Released For Linux Gamers This Week
  9. Eclipse IDE Starts Firing Up On Wayland's Weston
  10. OpenSUSE Announcement On SUSE's Recent Merger
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. New Group Calls For Boycotting Systemd
  2. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  3. Stop grabbing my keyboard :(
  4. Best Radeon for a Power Mac G5?
  5. New stress testing utility for GPU's
  6. Hd 6850
  7. support for first generation UVD blocks (RV6xx, RS780, RS880 and RV790)
  8. Nvidia joins the ranks of Apple and Microsoft