Linux KVM vs. VirtualBox 4.0 Virtualization Benchmarks

Published on December 13, 2010
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 7
Discuss This Article

Oracle's been vigorously working on their VM VirtualBox 4.0 software and in just the past week they have delivered two public betas that bring a number of new features. Among the changes there is support for Intel HD audio / ICH9 to guest VMs, the concept of extension packs, user-interface improvements, support for limiting a virtual machine's CPU time and I/O bandwidth, 3D acceleration fixes for guests, and a great number of bug-fixes. How though is this updated Oracle/Sun virtualization platform comparing to the older VirtualBox 3.2 release and that of the upstream Linux KVM (the Kernel-based Virtual Machine) that most Linux distributions rely upon? Here are a number of benchmarks that seek to answer this very question.

We have carried out a number of benchmarks under VirtualBox 3.2.12, VirtualBox 4.0 Beta 2, KVM in the Linux 2.6.35 kernel, and atop the actual system's host operating system. The tests we carried out in the four different configurations for looking at the Linux virtualization performance were Apache, SQLite, PostMark, FS-Mark, 7-Zip, Parallel BZIP2, C-Ray, GnuPG, OpenSSL, Gcrypt, Ogg, x264, FFmpeg, TCP Network Performance, timed Apache compilation under GCC, Bullet Physics Engine, and NAS Parallel Benchmarks. All of these tests were managed and executed by the Phoronix Test Suite.

The system used for this Linux virtualization benchmarking was based around the new Intel Core i7 970 Gulftown processor with six physical threads plus Hyper Threading to provide a logical count of 12 threads and a core clock of 3.20GHz. The motherboard was an ASRock X58 SuperComputer with 3GB of system memory, a 320GB Seagate ST3320620AS SATA HDD, and a NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 graphics card.

When running our automated virtualization tests under the different configurations we allowed the guests access to all 12 processor threads and limited the VMs to 1.5GB of system RAM (per the maximum "optimal settings" under VirtualBox for this system). The KVM testing was done with QEMU and Virt-Manager. The stock settings besides that were used throughout the testing process and on the host itself. The software stack on both the host and guests were Ubuntu 10.10 (x86_64) with the Linux 2.6.35-22-generic kernel, GNOME 2.32.0, X.Org Server 1.9.0, GCC 4.4.5, and the EXT4 file-system. With the VirtualBox testing the respective "Guest Additions" were installed for each release.

Without further ado, let us see how these virtualization systems compare.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Sumo Lounge Emperor
  2. Gallium3D Continues Improving OpenGL For Older Radeon GPUs
  3. 15-Way Open vs. Closed Source NVIDIA/AMD Linux GPU Comparison
  4. Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Comparison Shows Shortcomings
Latest Software Articles
  1. Intel Linux OpenGL Driver Leading Over Apple OS X
  2. The Cost Of Ubuntu Disk Encryption
  3. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  4. AMD Radeon R600 GPU LLVM 3.3 Back-End Testing
Latest Linux News
  1. KDE 4.11 Will Be The Last Major KDE4 Workspaces Feature Release
  2. New NVIDIA Linux Driver Supports The GeForce GTX 780
  3. Chrome 28 To Offer More Speed Improvements
  4. Digia Announces "Boot To Qt" Project
  5. X.Org Libraries Hit By Round Of Security Issues
  6. Wayland's Weston Gets Output Scaling Support
  7. Raspberry Pi Gets New Wayland Weston Renderer
  8. Debian GNU/Hurd 2013 Release Brings New Packages
  9. Intel Ultrabook Performance Is Faster With Mesa 9.2
  10. Hot Relocation HDD To SSD Support For Btrfs
  11. Phoronix Test Suite 4.6.0 "Utsira" Released
Latest Forum Talk
  1. Xserver 1.14 support will arrive with Catalyst...
  2. New NVIDIA Linux Driver Supports The GeForce GTX...
  3. Fedora 18 Comes To ARMv6, Raspberry Pi
  4. Raspberry Pi Gets New Wayland Weston Renderer
  5. Digia Announces "Boot To Qt" Project
  6. Radeon 7770 Can't reclock crash kernel
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite