Linux I/O Scheduler Comparison On The Linux 3.4 Desktop

Published on May 11, 2012
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 3 of 4
Discuss This Article

With the create test in CompileBench, the Deadline and Noop schedulers led to a performance drop this time compared to CFQ. For the Core 2 Duo HDD notebook, the best performance was through the deadline scheduler.

CFQ continued doing largely the best overall for the other CompileBench workloads.

Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Sumo Lounge Emperor
  2. Gallium3D Continues Improving OpenGL For Older Radeon GPUs
  3. 15-Way Open vs. Closed Source NVIDIA/AMD Linux GPU Comparison
  4. Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Comparison Shows Shortcomings
Latest Software Articles
  1. Intel Linux OpenGL Driver Leading Over Apple OS X
  2. The Cost Of Ubuntu Disk Encryption
  3. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  4. AMD Radeon R600 GPU LLVM 3.3 Back-End Testing
Latest Linux News
  1. New NVIDIA Linux Driver Supports The GeForce GTX 780
  2. Chrome 28 To Offer More Speed Improvements
  3. Digia Announces "Boot To Qt" Project
  4. X.Org Libraries Hit By Round Of Security Issues
  5. Wayland's Weston Gets Output Scaling Support
  6. Raspberry Pi Gets New Wayland Weston Renderer
  7. Debian GNU/Hurd 2013 Release Brings New Packages
  8. Intel Ultrabook Performance Is Faster With Mesa 9.2
  9. Hot Relocation HDD To SSD Support For Btrfs
  10. Phoronix Test Suite 4.6.0 "Utsira" Released
  11. New Intel X.Org Driver Supports All Of Haswell
Latest Forum Talk
  1. X.Org Libraries Hit By Round Of Security Issues
  2. Xserver 1.14 support will arrive with Catalyst...
  3. Radeon 7770 Can't reclock crash kernel
  4. Radeon HD 7850 Catalyst wine performance
  5. Digia Announces "Boot To Qt" Project
  6. Fedora 18 Comes To ARMv6, Raspberry Pi
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite