1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Linux I/O Scheduler Comparison On The Linux 3.4 Desktop

Michael Larabel

Published on 11 May 2012
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 4 - 28 Comments

At the request of Phoronix readers, and that the default I/O scheduler may change, here's a comparison of the CFQ, Deadline, and Noop schedulers on three systems and covering both rotating media (HDD) and solid-state storage (SSDs).

The hardware used for the comparison was an Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 laptop with a 100GB Hitachi HTS72201 SATA HDD, an Intel Core i5 2520M Sandy Bridge system with a 160GB Intel SSD, and an Intel Core i7 720QM Clarksfield notebook also with an Intel 160GB X-25 SSD. This article is primarily about publishing Linux desktop scheduler results while, hardware permitting, in another article will be workstation/server scheduler results.

All three systems were running Ubuntu 12.04 (x86_64) and formatted to EXT4 while the Linux kernel was upgraded to a Linux 3.4 kernel development snapshot.

CFQ, the Completely Fair Queuing scheduler, is the default scheduler for the mainline Linux kernel is what most distributions honor as the default.

The Noop scheduler is the simplest scheduler and based upon a FIFO model.

The Deadline scheduler attempts to guarantee the service start time of I/O requests.

The possible change coming up would be to move the default from CFQ to Deadline for modern, speedy solid-state drives (e.g. PCI Express-based SSDs).

A variety of disk centric workloads were run via the Phoronix Test Suite to gauge the three systems' performance with the CFQ / Deadline / Noop schedulers on Linux 3.4.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. AMD Radeon R9 290: Gallium3D vs. Catalyst Drivers
  2. AMD Radeon R9 290 Open-Source Driver Works, But Has A Ways To Go
  3. Trying The Configurable 45 Watt TDP With AMD's A10-7800 / A6-7400K
  4. Sumo's Omni Gets Reloaded
Latest Linux Articles
  1. The Most Energy Efficient Radeon GPU For AMD Linux Gaming
  2. 20-Way Radeon Comparison With Open-Source Graphics For Steam On Linux Gaming
  3. Preview: OS X 10.10 Yosemite vs. Ubuntu Linux GPU Performance
  4. Radeon Graphics Yield Mixed Results With Linux 3.17 Kernel
Latest Linux News
  1. Ubuntu's Utopic Unicorn 14.10 Beta 1 Released
  2. Genode OS 14.08 Has New GUI Architecture, Pluggable VFS
  3. Another Intel Linux Power Regression Is Being Investigated
  4. DNF Makes It A Step Closer To Replacing Yum On Fedora
  5. OS Battle: Linux Takes 1.7% Desktop Marketshare
  6. PHP 5.6 Officially Released With New Debugger
  7. LibreOffice 4.3.1 Released
  8. Re-Clocking Your NVIDIA GPU With Nouveau On Linux 3.17
  9. Radeon DRM Queues More Changes, RV6xx UVD For Linux 3.18
  10. Metro 2033 Redux Will Hopefully Hit Linux Real Soon
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Canonical Joined The Khronos Group To Help Mir/Wayland Drivers
  2. Users defect to Linux as OpenBSD removes Lynx from base system
  3. Best Radeon for a Power Mac G5?
  4. OC capability - Intel Core i5 4690K & Biostar Hi-Fi Z97WE
  5. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  6. AMD Releases UVD Video Decode Support For R600 GPUs
  7. Announcing radeontop, a tool for viewing the GPU usage
  8. It's Now Possible To Play Netflix Natively On Linux Without Wine Plug-Ins