1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Linux I/O Scheduler Comparison On The Linux 3.4 Desktop

Michael Larabel

Published on 11 May 2012
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 4 - 28 Comments

At the request of Phoronix readers, and that the default I/O scheduler may change, here's a comparison of the CFQ, Deadline, and Noop schedulers on three systems and covering both rotating media (HDD) and solid-state storage (SSDs).

The hardware used for the comparison was an Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 laptop with a 100GB Hitachi HTS72201 SATA HDD, an Intel Core i5 2520M Sandy Bridge system with a 160GB Intel SSD, and an Intel Core i7 720QM Clarksfield notebook also with an Intel 160GB X-25 SSD. This article is primarily about publishing Linux desktop scheduler results while, hardware permitting, in another article will be workstation/server scheduler results.

All three systems were running Ubuntu 12.04 (x86_64) and formatted to EXT4 while the Linux kernel was upgraded to a Linux 3.4 kernel development snapshot.

CFQ, the Completely Fair Queuing scheduler, is the default scheduler for the mainline Linux kernel is what most distributions honor as the default.

The Noop scheduler is the simplest scheduler and based upon a FIFO model.

The Deadline scheduler attempts to guarantee the service start time of I/O requests.

The possible change coming up would be to move the default from CFQ to Deadline for modern, speedy solid-state drives (e.g. PCI Express-based SSDs).

A variety of disk centric workloads were run via the Phoronix Test Suite to gauge the three systems' performance with the CFQ / Deadline / Noop schedulers on Linux 3.4.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. AMD Radeon R9 290: Gallium3D vs. Catalyst Drivers
  2. AMD Radeon R9 290 Open-Source Driver Works, But Has A Ways To Go
  3. Trying The Configurable 45 Watt TDP With AMD's A10-7800 / A6-7400K
  4. Sumo's Omni Gets Reloaded
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Preview: OS X 10.10 Yosemite vs. Ubuntu Linux GPU Performance
  2. Radeon Graphics Yield Mixed Results With Linux 3.17 Kernel
  3. AMD's RadeonSI Driver Sped Up A Lot This Summer
  4. Intel's Latest Linux Graphics Code Competes Against OS X 10.9
Latest Linux News
  1. Google Chrome 37 Brings Many Security Fixes
  2. MenuetOS Updated With SMP Threads & Onscreen Keyboard
  3. Mesa Has A New Release Manager
  4. Enlightenment E19 Lands Its New Wayland Compositor Code
  5. Nouveau Turns Into A Mess In Latest Linux 3.17 + Mesa 10.3-dev Tests
  6. New GCC 5.0 Changes, Command-Line Options That Landed So Far
  7. SteamOS Update 133 Has Better Intel Performance, VA-API
  8. DRM Graphics Changes For Linux 3.18 Might End Up Being Smaller
  9. Ioquake3 Works On Finally Switching Over To SDL2
  10. Linux 3.17-rc2 Release Celebrates 23 Years Of Linux
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  2. AMD Releases UVD Video Decode Support For R600 GPUs
  3. Announcing radeontop, a tool for viewing the GPU usage
  4. Users defect to Linux as OpenBSD removes Lynx from base system
  5. Chinese People Try To Patent Wine On ARM
  6. American Citizens running AMOK for food stamps
  7. "The World's Most Highly-Assured OS" Kernel Open-Sourced
  8. What Linux Distribution Should Be Benchmarked The Most?