1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Does Chrome Burn Through More Power Than Firefox?

Michael Larabel

Published on 15 August 2011
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 4 - 19 Comments

With my recent work in tracking down Linux power regressions and looking at other areas of Linux power consumption, there's been a number of emails sent in by Phoronix readers concerning the power consumption of web-browsers. In particular, some users seem to think that Google's Chrome/Chromium web-browser causes the system to go through noticeably more power than Mozilla Firefox and other web-browsers. But how much is this really the case? Here's some benchmarks.

Of those that have written me concerning web-browser power usage, much of it has just been concerns that their notebook becomes physically warmer when using one web browser over another and is burning through excess power. There's also been a reference to Chromium Issue 77625, which is about the Chromium browser causing an excessive number of wake-ups and using "massive amounts of power." For Chromium users, this issue is now fixed in the Chromium 14 development series.

The testing in this article is using an Intel Sandy Bridge notebook while it's running on battery and using the Phoronix Test Suite to monitor the CPU usage and power consumption while running three different browser-based benchmarks. The candidates for this comparison are Mozilla Firefox 4.0, Mozilla Firefox 5.0, and Google Chrome 13. The benchmarks were SunSpider, Peacekeeper, and ClubCompy Real-World Benchmark. Time was also given in the monitoring process for each browser to idle.

This browser power consumption testing was done on an Ubuntu 11.04 x86_64 installation with the Linux 3.1 development kernel as of 12 August, the Unity 3.8.10 desktop, X.Org Server 1.10.1, xf86-video-intel 2.15.0, Mesa 7.12-devel git-3ce2438, and an EXT4 file-system. The Sandy Bridge notebook was an HP EliteBook with an Intel Core i5 2520M, 4GB of RAM, 160GB Intel SSD, and Intel HD 3000 graphics.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. AMD Launches New FX CPUs, Cuts Prices On Existing Processors
  2. Preview: AMD's FX-9590 Eight-Core At Up To 5.0GHz On Linux
  3. Intel Launches The Core i7 5960X, Mighty Powerful Haswell-E CPUs
  4. AMD Radeon R9 290: Gallium3D vs. Catalyst Drivers
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Ondemand vs. Performance CPU Governing For AMD FX CPUs On Linux 3.17
  2. How Intel Graphics On Linux Compare To Open-Source AMD/NVIDIA Drivers
  3. The Fastest NVIDIA GPUs For Open-Source Nouveau With Steam Linux Gaming
  4. Testing For The Latest Linux Kernel Power Regression
Latest Linux News
  1. webOS Lives On As LuneOS With New Release
  2. Marek Lands Radeon Gallium3D HyperZ Improvements
  3. Mozilla Firefox 32 Surfaces With HTML5, Developer Changes
  4. Nouveau X.Org Driver Released With DRI3+Present, Maxwell, GLAMOR
  5. Microsoft & AMD Release C++ AMP Compiler With Linux Support
  6. AMD, Wine & Valve Dominated August For Linux Users
  7. Linux 3.17-rc3 Kernel Released Back On Schedule
  8. Lennart Poettering Talks Up His New Linux Vision That Involves Btrfs
  9. Mesa 10.3 RC2 Arrives Via Its New Release Manager
  10. Ubuntu 14.10's Lack Of X.Org Server 1.16 Gets Blamed On AMD
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Lennart Poettering Talks Up His New Linux Vision That Involves Btrfs
  2. AMD graphics doesn't work with AMD Catalyst drivers
  3. Best Radeon for a Power Mac G5?
  4. The dangers of Linux kernel development
  5. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  6. AMD Releases UVD Video Decode Support For R600 GPUs
  7. SSD seems slow
  8. Is laptop with Intel CPU and AMD dGPU worth buying considering especially AMD Enduro?