1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking Benchmarking Platform
Phoromatic Test Orchestration

The Linux 3.0 Kernel With EXT4 & Btrfs

Michael Larabel

Published on 24 June 2011
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 4 - 14 Comments

With the Linux 3.0 kernel carrying CleanCache support along with various improvements to the EXT4 and Btrfs file-system modules, it is time for another Phoronix file-system comparison. This time around the EXT4 vs. Btrfs performance is particularly important with Fedora 16 possibly switching to Btrfs by default. Due to this level of interest, for our Linux 3.0 kernel benchmarks of the EXT4 and Btrfs file-systems, an Intel SSD was tested as well as an old 5400RPM IDE notebook hard drive to represent two ends of the spectrum.

The first system was the Sandy Bridge notebook that Intel sent over, which is the HP EliteBook with an Intel Core i5 2520M, 4GB of RAM, 160GB Intel X-25 Extreme (SSDSA2M160) SSD, and SNB HD 3000 graphics. The other system was an old IBM ThinkPad R52 notebook with an Intel Pentium M 1.86GHz CPU, 2GB RAM, 80GB Hitachi HTS541080G9AT00 IDE HDD, and ATI Mobility Radeon X300 graphics. Both systems were running Ubuntu 11.04 with the Linux 3.0 development kernel. The Sandy Bridge notebook was able to run Ubuntu 11.04 64-bit while the Pentium M notebook was running the 32-bit release.

Testing was done with the default file-system mount options and other stock Ubuntu 11.04 settings. The Linux 3.0 kernel build had CleanCache/ZCache support enabled. Benchmarks were done via the Phoronix Test Suite. It is as simple as that so we can jump straight to the results.

Testing began with the Apache static web serving benchmark. For the high-end notebook with the quad-core Sandy Bridge CPU and Intel X-25 SSD, Btrfs was much faster than EXT4. Using Btrfs on this higher-end system led to 26% more requests per second being handled than EXT4. For the crippled Pentium M notebook, however, the performance was indifferent between the two file-systems likely due to being bottlenecked at the CPU.

Latest Articles & Reviews
  1. GeForce GTX 750 Series: Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Driver Performance
  2. GLAMOR + RadeonSI 2D Acceleration Is Quite Good For Open-Source AMD 2D Performance
  3. AMD Radeon R9 290 OpenGL On Ubuntu 15.04: Catalyst vs. RadeonSI Gallium3D
  4. Ubuntu 15.04 Offers Faster OpenGL For AMD Radeon GPUs On Open-Source
  5. Ubuntu 15.04 Brings Some Graphics Performance Improvements For Intel Haswell
  6. Sub-$20 802.11n USB WiFi Adapter That's Linux Friendly
Latest Linux News
  1. Steam Linux Usage Drops Below 1%
  2. Many OpenGL ES 3.1 Commits Land In Mesa
  3. HHVM 3.7 Brings More Performance Improvements
  4. Experimental DragonFlyBSD Code Adds Broadwell Graphics
  5. Virt-Manager 1.2.0 Brings OVMF/AAVMF Support For UEFI In VMs
  6. Interesting GSoC 2015 Projects: Wine D3DRM, GameStream, NaCL Fun
  7. An Ubuntu Phone Will Ship This Year With The Converged Unity Experience
  8. Ubuntu 15.10 Is Codenamed The Wily Werewolf
  9. Mono 4 Is Planned For Fedora 23
  10. The Six X.Org Summer GSoC Projects For 2015
Most Viewed News This Week
  1. Trying Out Microsoft Visual Studio Code On Linux
  2. Microsoft Releases New Code IDE For Linux!
  3. Improvements On The Way For GNOME's Nautilus File Manager
  4. A Lot Of Improvements Are Coming For Mir 0.13, Including Work Towards Libinput
  5. Kodi 15.0 Beta 1 Released
  6. Mono 4.0 Makes Use Of Microsoft's Open-Source Code, C# 6.0
  7. Wayland 1.8 Alpha Release Delayed
  8. Lucid Sleep Support Is Being Worked On For The Upstream Linux Kernel