1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Five Years Of Linux Kernel Benchmarks: 2.6.12 Through 2.6.37

Michael Larabel

Published on 3 November 2010
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 6 of 8 - 74 Comments

The Dhrystone 2 performance was not interesting in terms of kernel changes causing a performance impact.

Looking at the time to transfer 10GB via the TCP network loop-back interface was interesting. The performance actually regressed a fair amount within the Linux kernel over the past few releases. Google made some improvements in the Linux 2.6.36 kernel to the networking stack, which may partially attribute the improvement we noted in this release (from 55 seconds down to 44 seconds), but with the Linux 2.6.37 kernel (44 seconds) it's still noticeably behind of where this test was running in the Linux 2.6.12 kernel (26 seconds) and in the Linux 2.6.20 kernel (13 seconds) where it performed the best.

Due to file-system changes or another sub-system, (this is another test where the results will likely be bisected), the time it took to compile Apache dropped along the way and is doing rather well in recent versions of the Linux kernel.

The Apache benchmark is the start of our file-system-focused benchmarks, which have always proved to be particularly interesting when comparing versions of the Linux kernel. The Apache web-serving performance was impacted greatly between Linux kernel releases as the EXT3 file-system was altered and other changes in the Linux kernel. With the Linux 2.6.12 kernel, Fedora Core 4 with the Apache server was handling 8290 requests per second while it peaked in the Linux 2.6.27 kernel at an impressive 17132 requests per second and has receded in almost every release since. The stable Linux 2.6.36 kernel was handling 7014 requests per second on average and with the latest Linux 2.6.37 unstable kernel it looks to be up to about 7841 requests per second. While we know the EXT4 performance and Btrfs performance is near-constantly changing as both file-systems mature and new features added to improve data integrity and introduce other capabilities, it is interesting the mature EXT3 file-system continues to churn as well.

Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. AMD's New Athlon/Semprons Give Old Phenom CPUs A Big Run For The Money
  2. 13-Way Low-End GPU Comparison With AMD's AM1 Athlon
  3. ASUS AM1I-A: A Mini-ITX Board For Socketed Kabini APUs
  4. Mini-Box M350: A Simple, Affordable Mini-ITX Case
Latest Linux Articles
  1. How Much Video RAM Is Needed For Catalyst R3 Graphics?
  2. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS vs. 14.04 LTS Cloud Benchmarks
  3. Ubuntu 12.04.4 vs. 13.10 vs. 14.04 LTS Desktop Benchmarks
  4. AMD OpenCL Performance With AM1 Kabini APUs
Latest Linux News
  1. Easter Yields The Linux 3.15-rc2 Kernel Release
  2. The Most Amazing OpenGL Tech Demo In 64kb
  3. Packard Bell LM85 Now Supported By Coreboot
  4. AmazonBasics External USB 2.0 DVD Writer For Linux
  5. TP-LINK TG-3468: A $12 Linux PCI-E Gigabit Network Adapter
  6. Linux 3.15 Lands Some DRM Graphics Driver Fixes
  7. AMD Is Disabling DPM Support For RV770 GPUs
  8. ReactOS Working On A Community Windows OS
  9. eRacks Keeps Pushing Linux, Open-Source Systems After 15 Years
  10. Borderlands Is Being Considered For Linux
  11. Mesa 10.0 & 10.1 Stable Get Updated
  12. Git 2.0 Test Releases Begin With Many Changes
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. The GNOME Foundation Is Running Short On Money
  2. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  3. Catalyst 14.3 Beta
  4. Suggestions about how to make a Radeon HD 7790 work decently?
  5. Radeon 8000M problematic on Linux?
  6. Linux Kernel Developers Fed Up With Ridiculous Bugs In Systemd
  7. After Jack Keane, RuseSoft will briing Ankh 3 to Linux through Desura
  8. Suspected PHP Proxy Issue