1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Five Years Of Linux Kernel Benchmarks: 2.6.12 Through 2.6.37

Michael Larabel

Published on 3 November 2010
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 6 of 8 - 74 Comments

The Dhrystone 2 performance was not interesting in terms of kernel changes causing a performance impact.

Looking at the time to transfer 10GB via the TCP network loop-back interface was interesting. The performance actually regressed a fair amount within the Linux kernel over the past few releases. Google made some improvements in the Linux 2.6.36 kernel to the networking stack, which may partially attribute the improvement we noted in this release (from 55 seconds down to 44 seconds), but with the Linux 2.6.37 kernel (44 seconds) it's still noticeably behind of where this test was running in the Linux 2.6.12 kernel (26 seconds) and in the Linux 2.6.20 kernel (13 seconds) where it performed the best.

Due to file-system changes or another sub-system, (this is another test where the results will likely be bisected), the time it took to compile Apache dropped along the way and is doing rather well in recent versions of the Linux kernel.

The Apache benchmark is the start of our file-system-focused benchmarks, which have always proved to be particularly interesting when comparing versions of the Linux kernel. The Apache web-serving performance was impacted greatly between Linux kernel releases as the EXT3 file-system was altered and other changes in the Linux kernel. With the Linux 2.6.12 kernel, Fedora Core 4 with the Apache server was handling 8290 requests per second while it peaked in the Linux 2.6.27 kernel at an impressive 17132 requests per second and has receded in almost every release since. The stable Linux 2.6.36 kernel was handling 7014 requests per second on average and with the latest Linux 2.6.37 unstable kernel it looks to be up to about 7841 requests per second. While we know the EXT4 performance and Btrfs performance is near-constantly changing as both file-systems mature and new features added to improve data integrity and introduce other capabilities, it is interesting the mature EXT3 file-system continues to churn as well.

Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. AMD Launches New FX CPUs, Cuts Prices On Existing Processors
  2. Preview: AMD's FX-9590 Eight-Core At Up To 5.0GHz On Linux
  3. Intel Launches The Core i7 5960X, Mighty Powerful Haswell-E CPUs
  4. AMD Radeon R9 290: Gallium3D vs. Catalyst Drivers
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Ondemand vs. Performance CPU Governing For AMD FX CPUs On Linux 3.17
  2. How Intel Graphics On Linux Compare To Open-Source AMD/NVIDIA Drivers
  3. The Fastest NVIDIA GPUs For Open-Source Nouveau With Steam Linux Gaming
  4. Testing For The Latest Linux Kernel Power Regression
Latest Linux News
  1. New Group Calls For Boycotting Systemd
  2. The Features To Find With The Imminent Release Of LLVM/Clang 3.5
  3. Borderlands 2 Is Coming To Linux
  4. The Witcher 2 Ups The Performance More & Works Around Catalyst Bug
  5. Running Gallium3D's LLVMpipe On The Eight-Core 5GHz CPU
  6. Trying Intel OpenCL On Linux For Video Encoding
  7. GSoC 2014 Yielded Some Improvements For Mesa/X.Org This Year
  8. webOS Lives On As LuneOS With New Release
  9. Marek Lands Radeon Gallium3D HyperZ Improvements
  10. Mozilla Firefox 32 Surfaces With HTML5, Developer Changes
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Lennart Poettering Talks Up His New Linux Vision That Involves Btrfs
  2. nv and xorg.conf under Debian PPC
  3. AMD graphics doesn't work with AMD Catalyst drivers
  4. Best Radeon for a Power Mac G5?
  5. The dangers of Linux kernel development
  6. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  7. AMD Releases UVD Video Decode Support For R600 GPUs
  8. SSD seems slow