Intel UXA Acceleration Performance
UXA wasn't faster than EXA when it came to the simple GtkCheckButton widget testing. The results were close but EXA was faster by about 4%.
The last 2D GTK test was with the GtkDrawingArea Pixbufs where using the GEM-powered UXA acceleration took nearly half the time it took EXA to complete the benchmarking task.
With JXRenderMark, which effectively stresses the X Render extension, using UXA allowed for 44% more operations per second at rectangles blended of 128 x 128 px.
The trapezoid composition of 256 x 256 px with JXRenderMark was marginally slower with the UMA Acceleration Architecture. EXA had averaged 47 operations per second where as UXA was at 45 operations per second.
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
Latest Linux Articles
Latest Linux News
Latest Forum Discussions