1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking Benchmarking Platform
Phoromatic Test Orchestration

Intel UXA Acceleration Performance

Michael Larabel

Published on 26 December 2008
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 5 - 3 Comments

Subsequent to the introduction of the Graphics Execution Manager earlier this year, Intel had introduced a new acceleration architecture. UXA, or the UMA Acceleration Architecture, was developed as a temporary solution based upon the EXA architecture but with support for the kernel-driven GEM memory management. How though does the UXA performance compare to that of EXA? In this article we have ran some benchmarking looking at the Intel graphics performance.

UXA was introduced in early August to allow 2D pixmaps to become GEM objects. The EXA API was used as the basis of forming UXA but the code was then stripped away and replaced with code to support the Graphics Execution Manager for managing its memory. A month later it was clarified by Keith Packard at the X Developers' Summit with his UXA intentions. At that time he stated the UMA Acceleration Architecture will be discontinued and the GEM changes merged back into EXA once they decide how to split the pixmap management and acceleration architecture components. Keith hoped to have this revised EXA work done for X Server 1.6, but that hasn't been completed in time.

The UXA support is currently living within the xf86-video-intel 2.5 and xf86-video-video-intel 2.6 drivers and does require the Linux 2.6.28 kernel or later for the Graphics Execution Manager support. By default the Intel driver continues to use EXA so the AccelMethod option within the xorg.conf must be set to UXA.

For running a few tests to compare the performance of EXA and UXA we had used Ubuntu 9.04 Alpha 2 with the Linux 2.6.28 kernel, X Server 1.5.99.3, xf86-video-intel 2.5.1, Mesa 7.3, and GCC 4.3.3. These tests were run on a Samsung NC10 netbook with an Intel Atom N270 CPU and Intel 945GME graphics running at 1024 x 768. Our netbook was equipped with an OCZ Core Series V2 SSD 32GB and 1GB of DDR2 memory.

The tests we ran to look at the EXA and UXA performance was GtkPerf and JXRenderMark. Originally we had also carried out QGears2 tests, but we had run into stability issues and rendering defects with the UMA Acceleration Architecture. With QGears2 and some other 2D tasks had resulted in screen corruption and the X Server crashing. These tests were facilitated using the Phoronix Test Suite.

Latest Linux News
  1. At Least Two Ubuntu Phone Announcements Expected In June
  2. Russia's Baikal Chips End Up Going For A MIPS CPU
  3. Mesa Git OpenGL Tests With Intel Ivy Bridge Graphics
  4. Blender 2.75 Allows For AMD OpenCL Support
  5. GNOME's Mutter 3.17.2 Adds X11/Wayland Clipboard Interoperation
  6. Wayland 1.8 RC2 Arrives Along With New Weston Compositor Release
  7. LLVM 3.7 Is Planned For A Late August Release
  8. The OpenGL ES 3.1 Foundation Is Being Laid In Mesa
  9. There Are 140k Benchmark Results So Far On LinuxBenchmarking.com
  10. LLVM 3.6.1 Brings R600 & MIPS Fixes
Latest Articles & Reviews
  1. Opening The Gates To Our Daily Open-Source Linux Benchmark Results
  2. The Latest Features For Linux Performance Management + Benchmark Monitoring
  3. Noctua NH-U12DX i4 + NF-F12
  4. Btrfs RAID 0/1 Benchmarks On The Linux 4.1 Kernel
Most Viewed News This Week
  1. The Linux 4.0 EXT4 RAID Corruption Bug Has Been Uncovered
  2. NVIDIA's Proprietary Driver Is Moving Closer With Kernel Mode-Setting
  3. Systemd 220 Has Finally Been Released
  4. Zapcc Claims To Be A "Much Faster C++ Compiler"
  5. LibreOffice 5.0 Beta 1 Released
  6. OpenWRT 15.05 Preparing Improved Security & Better Networking
  7. Ubuntu's LXD vs. KVM For The Linux Cloud
  8. Features Added To Mesa 10.6 For Open-Source GPU Drivers