Intel Sandy Bridge Acceleration On Non-SNB Hardware

Published on September 08, 2011
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 6
Discuss This Article

Last week benchmarks were published of Intel's New Sandy Bridge Acceleration architecture (SNA) that showed several performance improvements for 2D and 3D, but the new acceleration architecture still wasn't mature with a few regressions compared to the normal UXA back-end. While the focus of this SNA support is on speeding up operations for Sandy Bridge (SNB) and forthcoming Ivy Bridge (IVB) hardware, SNA is supported for older Intel graphics processors too. Here are some benchmarks of the Sandy Bridge New Acceleration architecture when using the Ironlake and Gen3 back-ends.

The back-ends for Sandy Bridge New Acceleration include Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge, Ironlake, Broadwater, Gen3, and Gen2. For none of these generations is SNA the default, but when building the xf86-video-intel DDX, the --enable-sna argument must be passed. For the older hardware support with SNA, it is still not regression free. There are a few performance regressions but also other problems, namely there is issues with rendering window borders at times; see the screenshots below.

Worth noting that after last week's SNA performance tests, Intel's Chris Wilson explored the test results and made two commits (9a563ea and 32fc0c8) to make performance improvements to the Gen6 / Sandy Bridge back-ends based upon the Phoronix results. For this benchmarking was done using xf86-video-intel DDX Git as of 5 August (695e711). Mesa 7.12-devel Git was also as of Monday morning.

The Ironlake testing was done from an ASRock HM55-HT NetTop with an Intel Core i3 330M "Arrandale" processor with 4GB of RAM. The Gen3 back-end testing was from an MSI NetTop with an Intel Atom 330 and Intel 945 graphics with 1GB of RAM. Ubuntu 11.04 x86_64 was the base operating system. Besides the Intel DDX and Mesa from Git, the Linux 3.1 kernel was also used from Git. The stock X.Org Server (1.10.1) was used, although an SNA patch for it is known to increase performance even greater.

All testing was done with stock setting aside from toggling the SNA support. A variety of 2D and 3D benchmarks -- mostly the same ones as last week's SNA testing on Sandy Bridge -- was run via the Phoronix Test Suite.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Sumo Lounge Emperor
  2. Gallium3D Continues Improving OpenGL For Older Radeon GPUs
  3. 15-Way Open vs. Closed Source NVIDIA/AMD Linux GPU Comparison
  4. Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Comparison Shows Shortcomings
Latest Software Articles
  1. GCC 4.8.0 vs. LLVM Clang 3.3 Compiler Performance
  2. Intel Linux OpenGL Driver Leading Over Apple OS X
  3. The Cost Of Ubuntu Disk Encryption
  4. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
Latest Linux News
  1. A New X.Org-Free Wayland LiveCD Released
  2. Unity 8, Mir Made Progress This Week On Features
  3. LLVM Clang 3.3 RC2 Is Ready For Testing
  4. AMD RadeonSI Gallium3D Begins Simple CL Demos
  5. Intel Shows Off GNOME3-Based Tizen Shell
  6. Linux Desktop Security Could Be A Whole Lot Better
  7. KDE 4.11 Will Be The Last Major KDE4 Workspaces Feature Release
  8. New NVIDIA Linux Driver Supports The GeForce GTX 780
  9. Chrome 28 To Offer More Speed Improvements
  10. Digia Announces "Boot To Qt" Project
  11. X.Org Libraries Hit By Round Of Security Issues
Latest Forum Talk
  1. Unity 8, Mir Made Progress This Week On Features
  2. Linux's "Ondemand" Governor Is No...
  3. AMD RadeonSI Gallium3D Begins Simple CL Demos
  4. A New X.Org-Free Wayland LiveCD Released
  5. GCC 4.8.0 vs. LLVM Clang 3.3 Compiler Performance
  6. Linux Desktop Security Could Be A Whole Lot Better
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite