1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Benchmarking LLVM & Clang Against GCC 4.5

Michael Larabel

Published on 21 April 2010
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 6 of 6 - 17 Comments

LLVM-GCC had the best results with Himeno, a Poisson pressure solver, but when Clang was involved, it had the worst numbers. The LLVM-GCC binary produced 60% more MFLOPS than the LLVM Clang version.

Clang had not worked with John The Ripper, but with LLVM-GCC its performance was dismal compared to GCC 4.5.0. The 23-year-old compiler was 60% faster than LLVM-GCC.

Binaries from LLVM-GCC and Clang both struggled to compete with GCC 4.5.0 in the timed HMMer benchmark of a Pfam database search. LLVM-GCC and Clang were about 23% slower.

While using LLVM is faster at building code than GCC (except for the ImageMagick application), in most instances the GCC 4.5 built binaries had performed better than LLVM-GCC or Clang. Clang did deliver a surprising lead over GCC 4.5 and LLVM-GCC with the Apache benchmark where the Clang-built Apache managed to handle 9% more requests per second. There was also significant benefits for LLVM-GCC and Clang with the BYTE Unix Benchmark running the Dhrystone 2 test, but in the rest of the tests the performance was either close to that of GCC or well behind. In some tests, the performance of the Clang generated binaries was simply awful.

Though LLVM / Clang isn't the performance champion at this point, both components continue to be under very active development and there will hopefully be more news to report in the coming months. The LLVM/Clang performance may also certainly improve once more open-source projects begin offering support for detecting and better hooking into Clang. LLVM also does have other advantages over the GNU Compiler Collection that cannot be benchmarked. At the same time though, GCC has the benefits of supporting more hardware targets and hardware optimizations than does LLVM at this point and LLVM also has no plans for supporting Java, Fortran, or some of the other GCC-supported language front-ends. GCC's C++ support is also much more complete than LLVM's Clang at this point.

Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Overclocking The AMD AM1 Athlon & Sempron APUs
  2. AMD Athlon 5350 / 5150 & Sempron 3850 / 2650
  3. Upgraded Kernel & Mesa Yield A Big Boost For Athlon R3 Graphics
  4. AMD Athlon 5350 APU On Linux
Latest Linux Articles
  1. A Quick Look At GCC 4.9 vs. LLVM Clang 3.5
  2. Are AMD Athlon/Sempron APUs Fast Enough For Steam On Linux?
  3. AMD Athlon's R3 Graphics: RadeonSI Gallium3D vs. Catalyst
  4. GCC 4.9 Compiler Optimization Benchmarks For Faster Binaries
Latest Linux News
  1. Trying Out Radeon R9 290 Graphics On Open-Source
  2. Intel Broadwell GT3 Graphics Have Dual BSD Rings
  3. Early Linux 3.15 Benchmarks Of Intel Core i7 + Radeon
  4. Red Hat Releases Its RHEL 7 Release Candidate
  5. New Features Coming To Xubuntu 14.04 LTS
  6. NVIDIA Officially Releases CUDA 6
  7. Google Releases An AutoFDO Converter For Perf In LLVM
  8. Fedora 21 To Evaluate Remote Journal Logging, 64-bit ARM Emulation
  9. Star Citizen Will Be Coming To Linux
  10. Ubuntu 14.10 Convergence To Focus On Replacing Core Apps
  11. The Results Of Optimizing Radeon's VRAM Behavior
  12. Kernel Developers Discuss Improving Kernel Configurations
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Linux Kernel Developers Fed Up With Ridiculous Bugs In Systemd
  2. The GNOME Foundation Is Running Short On Money
  3. Bye bye BSD, Hello Linux: A Sys Admin's Story
  4. New tool for undervolt/overclock AMD K8L and K10 processors
  5. How to enable opengl 3.3 on r9 270?
  6. R290x sound problems
  7. radeon-profile: tool for changing profiles and monitoring some GPU parameters
  8. Torvalds Is Unconvinced By LTO'ing A Linux Kernel