1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

The Performance Between GCC Optimization Levels

Michael Larabel

Published on 13 October 2012
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 5 - 23 Comments

For those that have never benchmarked the performance differences between GCC's different optimization levels, here are some recent test results comparing the performance differences when using an AMD FX-8150 processor with GCC 4.7.2.

These are just some straightforward benchmarks to share showing the performance differences of GCC 4.7.2 from the AMD FX-8150 Bulldozer system when changing out the optimization flags and then having the Phoronix Test Suite re-build the tests each time followed by letting it do its automated benchmarks.

For those unfamiliar with the different optimization flags, see the GCC optimize options documentation. The tested flags used in this article include:

-O0 - Reduce compilation time and make debugging produce the expected results. This is the default.

-O1 - Optimize. Optimizing compilation takes somewhat more time, and a lot more memory for a large function.

-O2 - Optimize even more. GCC performs nearly all supported optimizations that do not involve a space-speed tradeoff. As compared to -O, this option increases both compilation time and the performance of the generated code.

-O3 - Optimize yet more. -O3 turns on all optimizations specified by -O2 and also turns on the -finline-functions, -funswitch-loops, -fpredictive-commoning, -fgcse-after-reload, -ftree-vectorize, -fvect-cost-model, -ftree-partial-pre and -fipa-cp-clone options.

-Os - Optimize for size. -Os enables all -O2 optimizations that do not typically increase code size. It also performs further optimizations designed to reduce code size.

-Ofast - Disregard strict standards compliance. -Ofast enables all -O3 optimizations. It also enables optimizations that are not valid for all standard-compliant programs. It turns on -ffast-math and the Fortran-specific -fno-protect-parens and -fstack-arrays.

Only the generated binary performance is being compared in this article and not focusing upon the compilation time (though there is one result shared in this article of the PHP compilation time) or generated binary size.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 Offers Great Linux Performance
  2. CompuLab Intense-PC2: An Excellent, Fanless, Mini PC Powered By Intel's i7 Haswell
  3. From The Atom 330 To Haswell ULT: Intel Linux Performance Benchmarks
  4. AMD Radeon R9 285 Tonga Performance On Linux
Latest Linux Articles
  1. AMD Moves Forward With Unified Linux Driver Strategy, New Kernel Driver
  2. MSI: Update Your BIOS From The Linux Desktop
  3. NVIDIA vs. AMD 2D Linux Drivers: Catalyst Is Getting Quite Good At 2D
  4. 15-Way GPU Comparison With Mesa 10.3 + Linux 3.17
Latest Linux News
  1. Ubuntu 16.04 Might Be The Distribution's Last 32-Bit Release
  2. Imagination Releases Full ISA Documentation For PowerVR Rogue GPUs
  3. Features GNOME Developers Want In The Linux Kernel
  4. GTK+ Gains Experimental Overlay Scrollbars
  5. Phoronix Test Suite 5.4 M3 Is Another Hearty Update
  6. GParted 0.20 Improves Btrfs Support
  7. EXT4 In Linux 3.18 Has Clean-ups, Bug Fixes
  8. Emacs 24.4 Has Built-In Web Browser, Improved Multi-Monitor Support
  9. NVIDIA's NVPTX Support For GCC Is Close To Being Merged
  10. KDE's KWin On Wayland Begins Using Libinput
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Users/Developers Threatening Fork Of Debian GNU/Linux
  2. HOPE: The Ease Of Python With The Speed Of C++
  3. Proof that strlcpy is un-needed
  4. Bye bye BSD, Hello Linux: A Sys Admin's Story
  5. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  6. NVIDIA Presents Its Driver Plans To Support Mir/Wayland & KMS On Linux
  7. AMD Is Restructuring Again, Losing 7% Of Employees
  8. Open-Source AMD Fusion E-350 Support Takes A Dive