1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

The Performance Between GCC Optimization Levels

Michael Larabel

Published on 13 October 2012
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 5 - 23 Comments

For those that have never benchmarked the performance differences between GCC's different optimization levels, here are some recent test results comparing the performance differences when using an AMD FX-8150 processor with GCC 4.7.2.

These are just some straightforward benchmarks to share showing the performance differences of GCC 4.7.2 from the AMD FX-8150 Bulldozer system when changing out the optimization flags and then having the Phoronix Test Suite re-build the tests each time followed by letting it do its automated benchmarks.

For those unfamiliar with the different optimization flags, see the GCC optimize options documentation. The tested flags used in this article include:

-O0 - Reduce compilation time and make debugging produce the expected results. This is the default.

-O1 - Optimize. Optimizing compilation takes somewhat more time, and a lot more memory for a large function.

-O2 - Optimize even more. GCC performs nearly all supported optimizations that do not involve a space-speed tradeoff. As compared to -O, this option increases both compilation time and the performance of the generated code.

-O3 - Optimize yet more. -O3 turns on all optimizations specified by -O2 and also turns on the -finline-functions, -funswitch-loops, -fpredictive-commoning, -fgcse-after-reload, -ftree-vectorize, -fvect-cost-model, -ftree-partial-pre and -fipa-cp-clone options.

-Os - Optimize for size. -Os enables all -O2 optimizations that do not typically increase code size. It also performs further optimizations designed to reduce code size.

-Ofast - Disregard strict standards compliance. -Ofast enables all -O3 optimizations. It also enables optimizations that are not valid for all standard-compliant programs. It turns on -ffast-math and the Fortran-specific -fno-protect-parens and -fstack-arrays.

Only the generated binary performance is being compared in this article and not focusing upon the compilation time (though there is one result shared in this article of the PHP compilation time) or generated binary size.

Latest Articles & Reviews
  1. Samsung 850 EVO SSD Linux Benchmarks
  2. Kubuntu 15.04 Is Turning Out Quite Nice, Good Way To Try Out The Latest KDE
  3. 5-Way Linux Distribution Comparison On The Core i3 NUC
  4. OCZ ARC 100 Linux SSD Benchmarks
  5. Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Works Great As A Linux Ultrabook
  6. Transcend SSD370 256GB
Latest Linux News
  1. Kdenlive Ported To Qt5/KF5, Coming To KDE Applications 15.04
  2. HTC & Valve Partnered Up For The Steam VR Headset
  3. 8cc: A Small C11 Compiler
  4. Not Everyone Likes The Possible "VULKAN" Name For Next-Gen OpenGL
  5. The Binary Blobs Making Up Coreboot
  6. Linux 4.0 & LLVM vs. GCC Yielded Much Interest This Month
  7. XBMC/Kodi 15.0 Alpha 1 Released
  8. Xfce 4.12 Released After Nearly Three Years Of Work
  9. The Khronos Group Filed A Trademark On "Vulkan" API
  10. Mozilla Thunderbird Adoption Climbs, Thunderbird 38 In May
Most Viewed News This Week
  1. Linux 4.0-RC1 Tagged, Linux 4.0 Will Bring Many Notable Improvements
  2. Screenshots Of The GNOME 3.16 Changes
  3. More Proof That Allwinner Is Violating The GPL
  4. The Tremendous Features Of Fedora 22
  5. Krita 2.9 Released, Their Biggest Release Ever
  6. Linux 4.0 Doesn't Have The Weirdest Codename
  7. A Single UEFI Executable With The Linux Kernel, Initrd & Command Line
  8. Canonical Comes Up With Its Own FUSE Filesystem For Linux Containers
%%CLICK_URL_UNESC%%