1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

GCC 4.6, LLVM/Clang 2.9, DragonEgg Five-System Benchmarks

Michael Larabel

Published on 28 March 2011
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 8 of 8 - 10 Comments

With x264 H.264 video encoding, GCC was marginally faster than DragonEgg and Clang on all of the systems.

Where Clang (and DragonEgg) seem to do universally better than GCC is when it comes to measuring the compiling time for the software it builds. Clang and DragonEgg are much faster at compiling than GCC.

In terms of which compiler produces the fastest C / C++ binaries, there is no one dominant compiler. With some applications, using LLVM with the Clang compiler front-end is the fastest where as with others the mature GCC compiler holds its ground, and in others, using GCC but with LLVM's code generator and optimizer via DragonEgg provides a unique advantage. It really depends upon your particular environment and other factors (if doing any compiler tuning, debugging possibilities with different compilers, and other distinct features to GCC and LLVM) as to which compiler is superior.

From the tests today and past benchmarks, LLVM/Clang does appear to almost always compile C / C++ code faster than using GCC, but at the same time, there's still software out there that doesn't build under Clang or is problematic. There are also other compilers out there like Open64, PCC, TCC, and ICC.

Via 1103264-IV-1103253IV95 these results can be further analyzed, exported, and compared against using OpenBenchmarking.org and the Phoronix Test Suite.

8
Next Page >>
About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Gigabyte AM1M-S2H
  2. AMD's New Athlon/Semprons Give Old Phenom CPUs A Big Run For The Money
  3. 13-Way Low-End GPU Comparison With AMD's AM1 Athlon
  4. ASUS AM1I-A: A Mini-ITX Board For Socketed Kabini APUs
Latest Linux Articles
  1. How Much Video RAM Is Needed For Catalyst R3 Graphics?
  2. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS vs. 14.04 LTS Cloud Benchmarks
  3. Ubuntu 12.04.4 vs. 13.10 vs. 14.04 LTS Desktop Benchmarks
  4. AMD OpenCL Performance With AM1 Kabini APUs
Latest Linux News
  1. Oracle Linux 6.5 vs. Oracle Linux 7.0 Beta Benchmarks
  2. Easter Yields The Linux 3.15-rc2 Kernel Release
  3. The Most Amazing OpenGL Tech Demo In 64kb
  4. Packard Bell LM85 Now Supported By Coreboot
  5. AmazonBasics External USB 2.0 DVD Writer For Linux
  6. TP-LINK TG-3468: A $12 Linux PCI-E Gigabit Network Adapter
  7. Linux 3.15 Lands Some DRM Graphics Driver Fixes
  8. AMD Is Disabling DPM Support For RV770 GPUs
  9. ReactOS Working On A Community Windows OS
  10. eRacks Keeps Pushing Linux, Open-Source Systems After 15 Years
  11. Borderlands Is Being Considered For Linux
  12. Mesa 10.0 & 10.1 Stable Get Updated
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. ReactOS Working On A Community Windows OS
  2. The GNOME Foundation Is Running Short On Money
  3. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  4. Catalyst 14.3 Beta
  5. Suggestions about how to make a Radeon HD 7790 work decently?
  6. Radeon 8000M problematic on Linux?
  7. Linux Kernel Developers Fed Up With Ridiculous Bugs In Systemd
  8. After Jack Keane, RuseSoft will briing Ankh 3 to Linux through Desura