1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Benchmarks Of GCC 4.5.0 Compiler Performance

Michael Larabel

Published on 19 April 2010
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 2 of 6 - 44 Comments

Beginning with measuring how long it took to build the Apache 2.2.11 web server with each GCC release, with the 4.5 release it took almost 8% more time to build than it did in GCC 4.3.0/4.4.0. This slower build process of Apache in GCC 4.5 may be attributed to the Link-Time Optimization (LTO) or other new work merged into GCC in the last year. The Link-Time Optimization is described on the GCC Wiki as "Link Time Optimization (LTO) gives GCC the capability of dumping its internal representation (GIMPLE) to disk, so that all the different compilation units that make up a single executable can be optimized as a single module. This expands the scope of inter-procedural optimizations to encompass the whole program (or, rather, everything that is visible at link time)."

Similarly, building PHP with GCC 4.5.0 was about 7% slower than in GCC 4.3.0/4.4.0.

With building ImageMagick under GCC 4.5 it ended up taking almost 11% more time to complete.

Starting with our benchmarks that are looking at the performance of the generated binaries under the past three GCC releases was 7-Zip. Right from the start, GCC 4.5.0 proved to be faster with 7-Zip than in GCC 4.3.0 or 4.4.0. GCC 4.4.0 had regressed slightly in its performance compared to GCC 4.3.0, but that was cleared up with 4.5.0 where it is now running faster than the 4.3 release.

Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. A Walkthrough Of The New 32 System Open-Source Linux Benchmarking Test Farm
  2. Habey MITX-6771: Mini-ITX Board With Quad-Core J1900 Bay Trail
  3. OCZ Vector 150 SSD On Linux
  4. Noctua i4 CPU Cooler: Great For Cooling High-End LGA-2011v3 CPUs
Latest Linux Articles
  1. AMD Kaveri: Open-Source Radeon Gallium3D vs. Catalyst 14.12 Omega Driver
  2. 12-Way AMD Catalyst 14.12 vs. NVIDIA 346 Series Linux GPU Comparison
  3. AMD Catalyst 14.12 Omega Driver Brings Mixed Results For Linux Users
  4. 6-Way Winter 2014 Linux Distribution Comparison
Latest Linux News
  1. Elasticsearch & wxPython 3 Proposed For Fedora 22
  2. The New SuperTuxKart Looks Better, But Can Cause GPU/Driver Problems
  3. GTK+ On Windows Now Supports OpenGL
  4. New Ruby Benchmarks On GCC vs. LLVM Clang Compilers
  5. Multi-Stream Transport 4K Monitors To Become Better Supported On Linux
  6. New Supertuxkart Beta Lands New Graphics Engine, Uses OpenGL 3.1+
  7. SuperX 3.0 Beta Continues To Polish The KDE Desktop Experience
  8. Radeon vs. Modesetting DDX Performance Comparison
  9. Linux Mint 17.1 RCs Out For Xfce & KDE
  10. New Input Drivers Coming For Linux 3.19 Kernel
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. XLennart: A Game For Systemd Haters With Nothing Better To Do
  2. Microsoft buying Mojang
  3. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  4. Premium subscription "login" times out much faster than forum
  5. AMD Catalyst 14.12 Linux Driver Released -- Huge Update!
  6. Did Valve already get what they wanted from SteamOS? i.e. Win kernel + BigPicture DE
  7. Advertisements On Phoronix
  8. Hurrican SDL Port