1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Fedora 7 to 10 Benchmarks

Michael Larabel

Published on 31 October 2008
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 8 - 38 Comments

Earlier this week we published benchmarks of all Ubuntu releases from 7.04 to the release candidate and had found the performance degraded with time, at least with the test system we used. As part of our testing to explore this issue, we had repeated many of the same tests on Fedora with all of their releases going back to Fedora 7. Has Fedora's desktop performance degraded too? Read the article to find out.

We had carried out the Fedora 32-bit SMP testing on the same notebook, a Lenovo ThinkPad T60 (2006 model, 2613-EJU), and used the same version of the Phoronix Test Suite (1.4.0 Beta 1). The ThinkPad T60 is comprised of an Intel Core Duo T2400 processor, Intel Mobile 945 + ICH7-M Chipset, 1GB of DDR2 memory, an 80GB HTS541080G9SA00 HDD, and an ATI Mobility Radeon X1400 128MB graphics processor. The same testing practices applied here too with disabling Compiz, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology, etc. Security Enhanced Linux (SELinux) was also disabled throughout testing.

With Fedora 7, 8, 9, and 10 Snapshot 3 we had used the Fedora DVDs and for add-on package selection had just installed the "Software Development" group of RPMs. Fedora 7 was running the Linux 2.6.21 kernel, X Server 1.3.0, and GCC 4.1.2. Fedora 8 shipped with the Linux 2.6.23 kernel, X Server 1.3.0, and GCC 4.1.2. Sulphur, a.k.a. Fedora 9, was introduced with the Linux 2.6.25 kernel, X Server 1.5 pre-release, and GCC 4.3.0. Finally, Fedora 10 Snapshot 3 shipped with the Linux 2.6.27 kernel, X Server 1.5.2, and GCC 4.3.2. These package versions roughly correlate with the Ubuntu releases that occurred during the same periods, but there are a few differences.

This time around we didn't run any graphics tests and focused the testing upon the areas where there were notable differences between the Ubuntu releases. The Phoronix Test Suite tests included LAME MP3 encoding, Ogg encoding, FLAC encoding, WavPack encoding, FFmpeg, timed Apache compilation, timed PHP compilation, timed ImageMagick compilation, Bonnie++, Flexible IO Tester, GnuPG, OpenSSL, BYTE Unix Benchmark, SciMark 2, RAMspeed, Bandwidth, Tandem XML, and Java SciMark 2.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Scythe Mugen MAX
  2. Intel Core i7 5960X Haswell-E On Linux
  3. Intel 80GB 530 Series M.2 SSD On Linux
  4. With A New Motherboard, The Core i7 5960X Haswell-E Lights Up
Latest Linux Articles
  1. 7-Way Linux Desktop Gaming Comparison On Ubuntu 14.10
  2. Intel P-State vs. CPUFreq Benchmarks On The i7-5960X
  3. RadeonSI GLAMOR Benchmarks With X.Org Server 1.16
  4. RadeonSI Gallium3D vs. Catalyst At 4K UHD On Linux
Latest Linux News
  1. F2FS Tools Gain FSCK Support
  2. FreeBSD 10.1 Has The New VT Driver, Hardware Improvements
  3. AntiMicro 2.6 Yields Greater Compatibility For Gamepads On Linux
  4. OpenGL 3.3 / GLSL 3.30 Lands For Intel Sandy Bridge On Mesa
  5. AMD's RadeonSI Gallium3D Driver Sees Some Improvements
  6. Mesa 10.3 Released With The Latest Open-Source GPU Driver Improvements
  7. GNOME 3.13.92 Officially Released
  8. Wine 1.7.27 Is Still Working Towards Direct2D Support
  9. Wasteland 2 Officially Launched Today, Including For Linux Gamers
  10. Tropico 5 Launches On Steam For Linux
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. SSD seems slow
  2. X.Org Women Outreach Program Only Turns Up Two Applicants So Far
  3. Can Linux kill a motherboard?
  4. Stop grabbing my keyboard :(
  5. Glamor now enabled in Debian radeonsi
  6. New stress testing utility for GPU's
  7. New Group Calls For Boycotting Systemd
  8. It's Now Possible To Play Netflix Natively On Linux Without Wine Plug-Ins