1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Fedora 7 to 10 Benchmarks

Michael Larabel

Published on 31 October 2008
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 8 - 38 Comments

Earlier this week we published benchmarks of all Ubuntu releases from 7.04 to the release candidate and had found the performance degraded with time, at least with the test system we used. As part of our testing to explore this issue, we had repeated many of the same tests on Fedora with all of their releases going back to Fedora 7. Has Fedora's desktop performance degraded too? Read the article to find out.

We had carried out the Fedora 32-bit SMP testing on the same notebook, a Lenovo ThinkPad T60 (2006 model, 2613-EJU), and used the same version of the Phoronix Test Suite (1.4.0 Beta 1). The ThinkPad T60 is comprised of an Intel Core Duo T2400 processor, Intel Mobile 945 + ICH7-M Chipset, 1GB of DDR2 memory, an 80GB HTS541080G9SA00 HDD, and an ATI Mobility Radeon X1400 128MB graphics processor. The same testing practices applied here too with disabling Compiz, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology, etc. Security Enhanced Linux (SELinux) was also disabled throughout testing.

With Fedora 7, 8, 9, and 10 Snapshot 3 we had used the Fedora DVDs and for add-on package selection had just installed the "Software Development" group of RPMs. Fedora 7 was running the Linux 2.6.21 kernel, X Server 1.3.0, and GCC 4.1.2. Fedora 8 shipped with the Linux 2.6.23 kernel, X Server 1.3.0, and GCC 4.1.2. Sulphur, a.k.a. Fedora 9, was introduced with the Linux 2.6.25 kernel, X Server 1.5 pre-release, and GCC 4.3.0. Finally, Fedora 10 Snapshot 3 shipped with the Linux 2.6.27 kernel, X Server 1.5.2, and GCC 4.3.2. These package versions roughly correlate with the Ubuntu releases that occurred during the same periods, but there are a few differences.

This time around we didn't run any graphics tests and focused the testing upon the areas where there were notable differences between the Ubuntu releases. The Phoronix Test Suite tests included LAME MP3 encoding, Ogg encoding, FLAC encoding, WavPack encoding, FFmpeg, timed Apache compilation, timed PHP compilation, timed ImageMagick compilation, Bonnie++, Flexible IO Tester, GnuPG, OpenSSL, BYTE Unix Benchmark, SciMark 2, RAMspeed, Bandwidth, Tandem XML, and Java SciMark 2.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. AMD R600g/RadeonSI Performance On Linux 3.16 With Mesa 10.3-devel
  2. Intel Pentium G3258 On Linux
  3. SilverStone Precision PS10
  4. ASRock Z97 Extreme6
Latest Linux Articles
  1. KVM Benchmarks On Ubuntu 14.10
  2. X.Org Server 1.16 Officially Released With Terrific Features
  3. Ubuntu With Linux 3.16 Smashes OS X 10.9.4 On The MacBook Air
  4. Preview: Benchmarking CentOS 7.0 & Scientific Linux 7.0
Latest Linux News
  1. Fedora 21 Has Been Delayed By Three Weeks
  2. Mono Begins To Focus On Performance, Assembles A Team
  3. Oracle Linux 7 Released Today As Its RHEL7 Clone
  4. Unigine Develops City Traffic System, A Driving Simulator
  5. Intel 3.0 X.Org Driver Still Baking, New Development Release
  6. Eric Anholt Makes Progress With Broadcom VC4 Graphics Driver
  7. Intel Is Getting Very Close To OpenGL 4.0/4.1/4.2 Mesa Support
  8. Valve Is Still Hiring For SteamOS, Linux Work
  9. Users Warned About Possible Regressions With DRI3
  10. GNOME Shell Gets Wayland HiDPI Fonts, Mutter Gets Touch Gestures
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Radeon related kernel bug??
  2. how the US intellegentia operates:
  3. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  4. AMD Publishes Open-Source Linux HSA Kernel Driver
  5. Next-Gen OpenGL To Be Announced Next Month
  6. Open-Source Radeon Performance Boosted By Linux 3.16
  7. Remote gui not accessible in Phoronix Test Suite 5.2
  8. AMD "Hawaii" Open-Source GPU Acceleration Still Not Working Right