1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

The Cost of SELinux, Audit, & Kernel Debugging

Michael Larabel

Published on 13 August 2009
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 6 - 29 Comments

When benchmarking development releases of Fedora in particular, they often end up being much slower than the final build and perform lower when compared against some of the other leading desktop distributions. As we have mentioned in previous articles, this is generally due to the debugging support enabled within the development builds of Fedora. To see just what the performance cost is, we have compared the Fedora 11 performance of the normal kernel against the kernel-debug package. Additionally, we also compared the performance when disabling SELinux and system auditing support.

Our test system for this article was an ASRock NetTop ION 330, which is made up of an Intel Atom 330 dual-core CPU, an ASRock AMCP7A-ION motherboard, 2GB of DDR2 system memory, a 320GB Seagate ST9320325AS SATA 2.0 drive, and the NVIDIA GeForce 9400M ION graphics.

Fedora 11 x86_64 was running with the Linux 2.6.29 kernel, GNOME 2.26.1, X Server 1.6.2 RC1, the NVIDIA 190.18 display driver, GCC 4.4.0, and an EXT4 file-system. Besides what we were testing in this article, all of the settings and packages were left stock. For our benchmarking we used version 2.0 of the Phoronix Test Suite.

The tests we ran in looking at the Fedora Linux performance under the different conditions were World of Padman, Apache Benchmark, LAME MP3 encoding, FFmpeg, Bwfirt, timed Hmmer Search, Threaded I/O Tester, PostMark, Dbench, GraphicsMagick, Crafty, dcraw, SQLite, and PostgreSQL pgbench. The "Stock" results were obtained when running Fedora 11 with all of its stock options/packages. The "No SELinux or Audit" was obtained when both SELinux and Audit were disabled at boot-time, but besides that was the same configuration as "Stock". Lastly, the "Kernel Debug" results were recorded when installing the kernel-debug package for the same kernel version and while SELinux and Audit returned to their default state of being enabled. The kernel-debug package contains all of the debugging code that the standard kernel does not.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Btrfs On 4 x Intel SSDs In RAID 0/1/5/6/10
  2. AMD Radeon R9 290 On Ubuntu 14.10: RadeonSI Gallium3D vs. Catalyst
  3. MSI X99S SLI PLUS On Linux
  4. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 Offers Great Linux Performance
Latest Linux Articles
  1. NVIDIA's Linux Driver Can Deliver Better OpenGL Performance Than Windows 8.1
  2. Windows 8.1 vs. Ubuntu 14.10 With Intel HD Graphics
  3. 6-Way Ubuntu 14.10 Radeon Gallium3D vs. Catalyst Driver Comparison
  4. NVIDIA vs. Nouveau Drivers On Ubuntu 14.10
Latest Linux News
  1. Wine 1.7.30 Continues Work On DirectWrite & Offers Regedit Fixes
  2. Has The Sky Fallen? Qualcomm Contributes To Freedreno's DRM/KMS Driver
  3. Manjaro Works To Make Calamares A Distribution-Independent Installer
  4. DisplayLink USB 3.0 Support Sounds Like A Mess
  5. PulseAudio Gains A Native Bluetooth Headset Backend
  6. X.Org Foundation Decides On Its Women Outreach Project
  7. GTK+ 3.16's New GtkGLArea Widget Gets Improved
  8. X.Org Server 1.17 ABI Bumped
  9. Fedora 21 Beta To Be Released Next Week
  10. Go 1.4 Beta Release Brings Big Runtime Changes
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. How to get rid of Linux
  2. Closed source to opensource
  3. What Would You Like To See Next?
  4. Is foolish currently develop in machine code, hexadecimal and assembly?
  5. Reducing The CPU Usage In Mesa To Improve Performance
  6. Help diagnosing problems with a Readon HD 4670 on Mesa 10.3.2-1
  7. Advertisements On Phoronix
  8. nv and xorg.conf under Debian PPC