1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

The Cost of SELinux, Audit, & Kernel Debugging

Michael Larabel

Published on 13 August 2009
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 6 - 29 Comments

When benchmarking development releases of Fedora in particular, they often end up being much slower than the final build and perform lower when compared against some of the other leading desktop distributions. As we have mentioned in previous articles, this is generally due to the debugging support enabled within the development builds of Fedora. To see just what the performance cost is, we have compared the Fedora 11 performance of the normal kernel against the kernel-debug package. Additionally, we also compared the performance when disabling SELinux and system auditing support.

Our test system for this article was an ASRock NetTop ION 330, which is made up of an Intel Atom 330 dual-core CPU, an ASRock AMCP7A-ION motherboard, 2GB of DDR2 system memory, a 320GB Seagate ST9320325AS SATA 2.0 drive, and the NVIDIA GeForce 9400M ION graphics.

Fedora 11 x86_64 was running with the Linux 2.6.29 kernel, GNOME 2.26.1, X Server 1.6.2 RC1, the NVIDIA 190.18 display driver, GCC 4.4.0, and an EXT4 file-system. Besides what we were testing in this article, all of the settings and packages were left stock. For our benchmarking we used version 2.0 of the Phoronix Test Suite.

The tests we ran in looking at the Fedora Linux performance under the different conditions were World of Padman, Apache Benchmark, LAME MP3 encoding, FFmpeg, Bwfirt, timed Hmmer Search, Threaded I/O Tester, PostMark, Dbench, GraphicsMagick, Crafty, dcraw, SQLite, and PostgreSQL pgbench. The "Stock" results were obtained when running Fedora 11 with all of its stock options/packages. The "No SELinux or Audit" was obtained when both SELinux and Audit were disabled at boot-time, but besides that was the same configuration as "Stock". Lastly, the "Kernel Debug" results were recorded when installing the kernel-debug package for the same kernel version and while SELinux and Audit returned to their default state of being enabled. The kernel-debug package contains all of the debugging code that the standard kernel does not.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. MSI X99S SLI PLUS On Linux
  2. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 Offers Great Linux Performance
  3. CompuLab Intense-PC2: An Excellent, Fanless, Mini PC Powered By Intel's i7 Haswell
  4. From The Atom 330 To Haswell ULT: Intel Linux Performance Benchmarks
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Open-Source Radeon 2D Performance Is Better With Ubuntu 14.10
  2. RunAbove: A POWER8 Compute Cloud With Offerings Up To 176 Threads
  3. 6-Way Ubuntu 14.10 Linux Desktop Benchmarks
  4. Ubuntu 14.10 XMir System Compositor Benchmarks
Latest Linux News
  1. Ubuntu 14.04 In The Power8 Cloud From RunAbove
  2. KDE With Theoretical Client-Side Decorations, Windows 10 Influence
  3. Sandusky Lee: Great Cabinets For Storing All Your Computer Gear
  4. Fedora 21 Beta & Final Release Slip Further
  5. Mesa 10.3.2 Has A Couple Bug-Fixes
  6. RadeonSI/R600g HyperZ Support Gets Turned Back On
  7. openSUSE Factory & Tumbleweed Are Merging
  8. More Fedora Delays: Fedora 21 Beta Slips
  9. Mono Brings C# To The Unreal Engine 4
  10. Coreboot Now Has Support For Intel Broadwell Hardware
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Use Ubuntu MATE 14.10 Make it an official distro.
  2. HOPE: The Ease Of Python With The Speed Of C++
  3. Users/Developers Threatening Fork Of Debian GNU/Linux
  4. Debian Is Back To Discussing Init Systems, Freedom of Choice
  5. AMD Radeon VDPAU Video Performance With Gallium3D
  6. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  7. Ubuntu 16.04 Might Be The Distribution's Last 32-Bit Release
  8. Linux hacker compares Solaris kernel code: