The Cost of SELinux, Audit, & Kernel Debugging

Published on August 13, 2009
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 6
Discuss This Article

When benchmarking development releases of Fedora in particular, they often end up being much slower than the final build and perform lower when compared against some of the other leading desktop distributions. As we have mentioned in previous articles, this is generally due to the debugging support enabled within the development builds of Fedora. To see just what the performance cost is, we have compared the Fedora 11 performance of the normal kernel against the kernel-debug package. Additionally, we also compared the performance when disabling SELinux and system auditing support.

Our test system for this article was an ASRock NetTop ION 330, which is made up of an Intel Atom 330 dual-core CPU, an ASRock AMCP7A-ION motherboard, 2GB of DDR2 system memory, a 320GB Seagate ST9320325AS SATA 2.0 drive, and the NVIDIA GeForce 9400M ION graphics.

Fedora 11 x86_64 was running with the Linux 2.6.29 kernel, GNOME 2.26.1, X Server 1.6.2 RC1, the NVIDIA 190.18 display driver, GCC 4.4.0, and an EXT4 file-system. Besides what we were testing in this article, all of the settings and packages were left stock. For our benchmarking we used version 2.0 of the Phoronix Test Suite.

The tests we ran in looking at the Fedora Linux performance under the different conditions were World of Padman, Apache Benchmark, LAME MP3 encoding, FFmpeg, Bwfirt, timed Hmmer Search, Threaded I/O Tester, PostMark, Dbench, GraphicsMagick, Crafty, dcraw, SQLite, and PostgreSQL pgbench. The "Stock" results were obtained when running Fedora 11 with all of its stock options/packages. The "No SELinux or Audit" was obtained when both SELinux and Audit were disabled at boot-time, but besides that was the same configuration as "Stock". Lastly, the "Kernel Debug" results were recorded when installing the kernel-debug package for the same kernel version and while SELinux and Audit returned to their default state of being enabled. The kernel-debug package contains all of the debugging code that the standard kernel does not.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Intel Haswell HD Graphics 4600 vs. AMD Radeon Graphics On Linux
  2. Intel Haswell HD Graphics 4600 Performance On Ubuntu Linux
  3. Intel Core i7 4770K "Haswell" Benchmarks On Ubuntu Linux
  4. The First Experience Of Intel Haswell On Linux
Latest Software Articles
  1. Optimized Binaries Provide Great Benefits For Intel Haswell
  2. 11-Way Linux, BSD Platform Comparison
  3. SNA Acceleration Works Great For Intel Core i7 Haswell
  4. The Linux Evolution For Intel Haswell's Performance
Latest Linux News
  1. KDE's KWin Made Lots Of Progress In 4.11
  2. Ubuntu Announces Carrier Advisory Group
  3. Qt 5.1 Release Candidate 1 Has Arrived
  4. In-Fighting Continues Over Mir On Non-Unity Ubuntu
  5. Subversion 1.8 Presents New Features
  6. LLVM 3.3 Officially Released
  7. LLVM/Clang Now Uses Loop Vectorizer At New Levels
  8. Intel GPU Driver Tries To Rip Out FBDEV Support
  9. Coreboot Doing AMD USB 3.0, Q35 QEMU Emulation
  10. VP9 Codec Now Enabled By Default In Chrome
  11. openSUSE 13.1 M2 Plays On PulseAudio 4.0
Latest Forum Talk
  1. Ubuntu Announces Carrier Advisory Group
  2. VP9 Codec Now Enabled By Default In Chrome
  3. Intel GPU Driver Tries To Rip Out FBDEV Support
  4. In-Fighting Continues Over Mir On Non-Unity Ubuntu
  5. Handbrake 0.9.9 Supports OpenCL Offloading
  6. Planetary Annihilation Plans To Come To Linux
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite