1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

The Cost of SELinux, Audit, & Kernel Debugging

Michael Larabel

Published on 13 August 2009
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 6 - 29 Comments

When benchmarking development releases of Fedora in particular, they often end up being much slower than the final build and perform lower when compared against some of the other leading desktop distributions. As we have mentioned in previous articles, this is generally due to the debugging support enabled within the development builds of Fedora. To see just what the performance cost is, we have compared the Fedora 11 performance of the normal kernel against the kernel-debug package. Additionally, we also compared the performance when disabling SELinux and system auditing support.

Our test system for this article was an ASRock NetTop ION 330, which is made up of an Intel Atom 330 dual-core CPU, an ASRock AMCP7A-ION motherboard, 2GB of DDR2 system memory, a 320GB Seagate ST9320325AS SATA 2.0 drive, and the NVIDIA GeForce 9400M ION graphics.

Fedora 11 x86_64 was running with the Linux 2.6.29 kernel, GNOME 2.26.1, X Server 1.6.2 RC1, the NVIDIA 190.18 display driver, GCC 4.4.0, and an EXT4 file-system. Besides what we were testing in this article, all of the settings and packages were left stock. For our benchmarking we used version 2.0 of the Phoronix Test Suite.

The tests we ran in looking at the Fedora Linux performance under the different conditions were World of Padman, Apache Benchmark, LAME MP3 encoding, FFmpeg, Bwfirt, timed Hmmer Search, Threaded I/O Tester, PostMark, Dbench, GraphicsMagick, Crafty, dcraw, SQLite, and PostgreSQL pgbench. The "Stock" results were obtained when running Fedora 11 with all of its stock options/packages. The "No SELinux or Audit" was obtained when both SELinux and Audit were disabled at boot-time, but besides that was the same configuration as "Stock". Lastly, the "Kernel Debug" results were recorded when installing the kernel-debug package for the same kernel version and while SELinux and Audit returned to their default state of being enabled. The kernel-debug package contains all of the debugging code that the standard kernel does not.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Rosewill RS-MI-01: An Ultra Low-Cost Mini-ITX Chassis
  2. D-Link DCS-2330L HD Wireless Network Camera
  3. Gigabyte AM1M-S2H
  4. AMD's New Athlon/Semprons Give Old Phenom CPUs A Big Run For The Money
Latest Linux Articles
  1. AMD Catalyst 14.4 Brings Few Linux Performance Improvements
  2. The Performance Of Fedora 20 Updated
  3. Clang Fights GCC On AMD's Athlon AM1 APU With Jaguar Cores
  4. Ubuntu 14.04 LTS vs. Oracle Linux vs. CentOS vs. openSUSE
Latest Linux News
  1. PC-BSD Is Developing Its Own Desktop Environment
  2. Valve Is Bringing VOGL To Windows & Working On Regression Tests
  3. Canonical Is Taking Over Linux 3.13 Kernel Maintenance
  4. Google Web Designer Is Now Natively Available On Linux
  5. Ubuntu 14.10 Is Codenamed The Utopic Unicorn
  6. Audacious 3.5 Lightweight Audio Player Released
  7. Steam Updated For Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, SteamOS
  8. DNF 0.5 Yum Replacement Now Supports Groups
  9. Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.0 Is Looking Fantastic
  10. Intel Is Launching An Interesting Bay Trail NUC Next Week
  11. Another X.Org EVoC Proposed For OpenGL 4+ Tests
  12. The Best Features Coming With Qt 5.3
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Linux Kernel Developers Fed Up With Ridiculous Bugs In Systemd
  2. The Most Amazing OpenGL Tech Demo In 64kb
  3. Announcing radeontop, a tool for viewing the GPU usage
  4. HTPC-upgrade advice: AMD Richland A8-7600 or Kaveri A10-6700T ???
  5. New card. Open source drivers only.
  6. The GNOME Foundation Is Running Short On Money
  7. Script for Fan Speed Control
  8. Torvalds Is Unconvinced By LTO'ing A Linux Kernel