1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Does SELinux Slow Down Fedora 15?

Michael Larabel

Published on 4 June 2011
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 4 - 10 Comments

Earlier this week there were Fedora 15 vs. Ubuntu 11.04 benchmarks looking at the overall system performance as well as the power consumption. Both of these Linux distributions had performed close to one another, as is expected considering the similarities in their kernel and other packages, but there were some discrepancies in the disk tests. Speculations in the forums were that some of the performance differences might be attributed to SELinux, so here are some tests seeing the performance impact of SELinux on Fedora 15.

Security-Enhanced Linux (SELinux) continues to be enabled by default on Fedora installations. Fortunately, compared to the early Fedora (Core) days, SELinux is much less problematic now than it was in years past. Two years ago, there were SELinux benchmarks on Phoronix, but here is an updated look at where things stand today.

With Fedora 15, the default SELinux settings is the enforcing mode (the SELinux security policy is enabled) while the other options are permissive (SELinux just prints warnings instead of enforcing the policy), or to outright disable SELinux whereby there is no security protection. There are also the targeted and strict types of SELinux, with the default being the targeted mode. In this article are benchmarks of the SELinux enforcing and permissive modes, along with this Linux feature bring outright disabled.

To look for the greatest impact, a low-power netbook was used for testing. This netbook was the Samsung NC10 with an Intel Atom N270 CPU, i945 graphics, 2GB of system memory, and a 32GB OCZ Core Series SSD. A clean install of Fedora 15 (i686) with the Linux 2.6.38 kernel, GNOME Shell 3.0.1, X Server 1.10.1, xf86-video-intel 2.14.0, Mesa 7.11-devel, GCC 4.6.0, and an EXT4 file-system were used.

A few different tests from OpenBenchmarking.org on the Phoronix Test Suite were used to analyze the SELinux performance on the Fedora 15 "Lovelock" operating system.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Mini-Box M350: A Simple, Affordable Mini-ITX Case
  2. Overclocking The AMD AM1 Athlon & Sempron APUs
  3. AMD Athlon 5350 / 5150 & Sempron 3850 / 2650
  4. Upgraded Kernel & Mesa Yield A Big Boost For Athlon R3 Graphics
Latest Linux Articles
  1. A Quick Look At GCC 4.9 vs. LLVM Clang 3.5
  2. Are AMD Athlon/Sempron APUs Fast Enough For Steam On Linux?
  3. AMD Athlon's R3 Graphics: RadeonSI Gallium3D vs. Catalyst
  4. GCC 4.9 Compiler Optimization Benchmarks For Faster Binaries
Latest Linux News
  1. R600 Gallium3D Disables LLVM Back-End By Default
  2. Fedora 21 Gets GNOME 3.12, PHP 5.6, Mono 3.4
  3. Fedora Workstation Is Making Me Quite Excited
  4. Maynard: A Lightweight Wayland Desktop
  5. Chromium Browser Going Through Growing Pains In Ubuntu 14.04
  6. KDE 4.13 Is Being Released Today With New Features
  7. Trying Out Radeon R9 290 Graphics On Open-Source
  8. Intel Broadwell GT3 Graphics Have Dual BSD Rings
  9. Early Linux 3.15 Benchmarks Of Intel Core i7 + Radeon
  10. Red Hat Releases Its RHEL 7 Release Candidate
  11. New Features Coming To Xubuntu 14.04 LTS
  12. NVIDIA Officially Releases CUDA 6
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. The GNOME Foundation Is Running Short On Money
  2. Linux Kernel Developers Fed Up With Ridiculous Bugs In Systemd
  3. Change installation destination from home directory
  4. After Jack Keane, RuseSoft will briing Ankh 3 to Linux through Desura
  5. Bye bye BSD, Hello Linux: A Sys Admin's Story
  6. New tool for undervolt/overclock AMD K8L and K10 processors
  7. How to enable opengl 3.3 on r9 270?
  8. R290x sound problems