1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Does SELinux Slow Down Fedora 15?

Michael Larabel

Published on 4 June 2011
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 4 - 10 Comments

Earlier this week there were Fedora 15 vs. Ubuntu 11.04 benchmarks looking at the overall system performance as well as the power consumption. Both of these Linux distributions had performed close to one another, as is expected considering the similarities in their kernel and other packages, but there were some discrepancies in the disk tests. Speculations in the forums were that some of the performance differences might be attributed to SELinux, so here are some tests seeing the performance impact of SELinux on Fedora 15.

Security-Enhanced Linux (SELinux) continues to be enabled by default on Fedora installations. Fortunately, compared to the early Fedora (Core) days, SELinux is much less problematic now than it was in years past. Two years ago, there were SELinux benchmarks on Phoronix, but here is an updated look at where things stand today.

With Fedora 15, the default SELinux settings is the enforcing mode (the SELinux security policy is enabled) while the other options are permissive (SELinux just prints warnings instead of enforcing the policy), or to outright disable SELinux whereby there is no security protection. There are also the targeted and strict types of SELinux, with the default being the targeted mode. In this article are benchmarks of the SELinux enforcing and permissive modes, along with this Linux feature bring outright disabled.

To look for the greatest impact, a low-power netbook was used for testing. This netbook was the Samsung NC10 with an Intel Atom N270 CPU, i945 graphics, 2GB of system memory, and a 32GB OCZ Core Series SSD. A clean install of Fedora 15 (i686) with the Linux 2.6.38 kernel, GNOME Shell 3.0.1, X Server 1.10.1, xf86-video-intel 2.14.0, Mesa 7.11-devel, GCC 4.6.0, and an EXT4 file-system were used.

A few different tests from OpenBenchmarking.org on the Phoronix Test Suite were used to analyze the SELinux performance on the Fedora 15 "Lovelock" operating system.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Intel Launches The Core i7 5960X, Mighty Powerful Haswell-E CPUs
  2. AMD Radeon R9 290: Gallium3D vs. Catalyst Drivers
  3. AMD Radeon R9 290 Open-Source Driver Works, But Has A Ways To Go
  4. Trying The Configurable 45 Watt TDP With AMD's A10-7800 / A6-7400K
Latest Linux Articles
  1. How Intel Graphics On Linux Compare To Open-Source AMD/NVIDIA Drivers
  2. The Fastest NVIDIA GPUs For Open-Source Nouveau With Steam Linux Gaming
  3. Testing For The Latest Linux Kernel Power Regression
  4. The Most Energy Efficient Radeon GPU For AMD Linux Gaming
Latest Linux News
  1. AMD, Wine & Valve Dominated August For Linux Users
  2. Linux 3.17-rc3 Kernel Released Back On Schedule
  3. Lennart Poettering Talks Up His New Linux Vision That Involves Btrfs
  4. Mesa 10.3 RC2 Arrives Via Its New Release Manager
  5. Ubuntu 14.10's Lack Of X.Org Server 1.16 Gets Blamed On AMD
  6. MSI Motherboard BIOS Updating Remains A Pain For Linux Users
  7. See How Your Linux System Performs Against The Latest Intel/AMD CPUs
  8. AMD Steppe Eagle Flys To Coreboot
  9. Intel Beignet Is Working Out Surprisingly Well For OpenCL On Linux
  10. Coreboot Adds Lenovo X220 With Native Sandy Bridge Support
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. SSD seems slow
  2. AMD Releases UVD Video Decode Support For R600 GPUs
  3. Is laptop with Intel CPU and AMD dGPU worth buying considering especially AMD Enduro?
  4. Btrfs Gets Talked Up, Googler Encourages You To Try Btrfs
  5. Radeon HD5670 and Ubuntu 14.04
  6. Updated graphics drivers for Ubuntu 12.04 Precise LTS
  7. Catalyst 14.201.1008
  8. It's Now Possible To Play Netflix Natively On Linux Without Wine Plug-Ins