1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Is Fedora 15 Faster Than Ubuntu 11.04?

Michael Larabel

Published on 31 May 2011
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 6 of 6 - 26 Comments

Overall, Ubuntu 11.04 has better disk performance than Fedora 15, but Fedora 15 has better graphics driver support and performance. With the computational tests that were carried out, the performance was largely indifferent between these two new Linux distributions with there not being any dramatic changes due to GCC 4.5.2 vs. GCC 4.6.0 defaults. Next is a look at the battery performance.

When looking at the power consumption for each notebook and Linux distribution when running the battery-power-usage test, the power consumption between Fedora 15 and Ubuntu 11.04 was basically the same. With this test, the system is idling at the desktop followed by idling after the display has been turned off via DPMS, then re-enabled and a brief 1080p video clip is run via MPlayer.

Fedora 15 is advertised as having various power management optimizations, but it does not appear to have any definitive advantage over Ubuntu 11.04 in this area at least for the three Intel notebooks that were tested. Our initial tests have also shown that Fedora 15 is affected by the notorious Linux kernel power regressions that are still living upstream.

When looking at the battery power consumption when both distributions were under high CPU load due to the 7-Zip compression test, the power consumption for the three notebooks had each went through a similar amount of power in looking at Ubuntu 11.04 vs. Fedora 15.

For those wishing to run their own comparisons of distributions, these results are also available via OpenBenchmarking.org.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Articles & Reviews
  1. Samsung 850 EVO SSD Linux Benchmarks
  2. Kubuntu 15.04 Is Turning Out Quite Nice, Good Way To Try Out The Latest KDE
  3. 5-Way Linux Distribution Comparison On The Core i3 NUC
  4. OCZ ARC 100 Linux SSD Benchmarks
  5. Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Works Great As A Linux Ultrabook
  6. Transcend SSD370 256GB
Latest Linux News
  1. AMD Will Release Mantle Programming Guide, API Reference This Month
  2. Unreal Engine Made Free By Epic Games
  3. Qt 5.5 Alpha Is Getting Close, But Still Behind Schedule
  4. OpenBSD Sponsors Work For Better Browser Security
  5. Improved ODF Reading Support Comes To KDE's Calligra
  6. Another Step Closer On The New Linux Benchmarking Test Farm
  7. Confirmed: Vulkan Is The Next-Gen Graphics API
  8. Kdenlive Ported To Qt5/KF5, Coming To KDE Applications 15.04
  9. HTC & Valve Partnered Up For The Steam VR Headset
  10. 8cc: A Small C11 Compiler
Most Viewed News This Week
  1. Screenshots Of The GNOME 3.16 Changes
  2. More Proof That Allwinner Is Violating The GPL
  3. The Tremendous Features Of Fedora 22
  4. Krita 2.9 Released, Their Biggest Release Ever
  5. A Single UEFI Executable With The Linux Kernel, Initrd & Command Line
  6. Linux 4.0 Doesn't Have The Weirdest Codename
  7. Canonical Comes Up With Its Own FUSE Filesystem For Linux Containers
  8. Firefox 36 Brings Full HTTP/2 Support
%%CLICK_URL_UNESC%%