The Performance Of EXT4 Then & Now

Published on January 19, 2010
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 6
Discuss This Article

Over the past week there has been a lot of talk about the EXT4 file-system following the announcement that Google is migrating their EXT2 file-systems to EXT4. Their reasons for this transition to EXT4 are attributed to the easy migration process and Google engineers are pleased with this file-system's performance. However, as we mentioned in that news post last week and in many other articles over the past weeks and months, EXT4 is not as great of a contender as it was in the past, well, for some tests at least. The performance of the EXT4 file-system commonly goes down with new kernel releases and not up, as kernel developers continue to introduce new safeguards to address potential data loss problems that initially plagued some EXT4 users. For our latest EXT4 benchmarks we have numbers that show this file-system's performance using a vanilla 2.6.28 kernel (when EXT4 was marked as stable) and then every major kernel release up through the latest Linux 2.6.33 release candidate.

We had installed Ubuntu 9.04 for this testing and left everything in its stock configuration except for swapping out the kernels. The kernels we used for testing were all obtained from the Ubuntu kernel mainline PPA. These kernels were the 64-bit versions of the 2.6.28, 2.6.29, 2.6.30, 2.6.31, 2.6.32, and 2.6.33-rc4 releases. We tested out a Linux 2.6.33 kernel release candidate as Phoromatic Tracker running in our kernel test farm had found a few performance drops on a solid-state drive with the EXT4 file-system in the current kernel development cycle, with new results being uploaded daily via Phoromatic at kernel-tracker.phoromatic.com. The EXT4 file-system mount options were left at their defaults (though at the end of this article we also have some results using the nobarrier mount option).

This latest round of file-system testing used the IOzone, Threaded I/O Tester, PostgreSQL, PostMark, Dbench, AIO-Stress, and FS-Mark tests, which were run under the Phoronix Test Suite. The system for this testing was an ASRock ION 330HT-BD NetTop with an Intel Atom 330 processor clocked at 1.80GHz (overclocked), ASRock AMCP7AION-HT motherboard, 2GB of system memory, NVIDIA GeForce 9400M ION graphics, and a 320GB Seagate ST9320325AS SATA HDD.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Sumo Lounge Emperor
  2. Gallium3D Continues Improving OpenGL For Older Radeon GPUs
  3. 15-Way Open vs. Closed Source NVIDIA/AMD Linux GPU Comparison
  4. Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Comparison Shows Shortcomings
Latest Software Articles
  1. Intel Linux OpenGL Driver Leading Over Apple OS X
  2. The Cost Of Ubuntu Disk Encryption
  3. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  4. AMD Radeon R600 GPU LLVM 3.3 Back-End Testing
Latest Linux News
  1. KDE 4.11 Will Be The Last Major KDE4 Workspaces Feature Release
  2. New NVIDIA Linux Driver Supports The GeForce GTX 780
  3. Chrome 28 To Offer More Speed Improvements
  4. Digia Announces "Boot To Qt" Project
  5. X.Org Libraries Hit By Round Of Security Issues
  6. Wayland's Weston Gets Output Scaling Support
  7. Raspberry Pi Gets New Wayland Weston Renderer
  8. Debian GNU/Hurd 2013 Release Brings New Packages
  9. Intel Ultrabook Performance Is Faster With Mesa 9.2
  10. Hot Relocation HDD To SSD Support For Btrfs
  11. Phoronix Test Suite 4.6.0 "Utsira" Released
Latest Forum Talk
  1. Digia Announces "Boot To Qt" Project
  2. Debian GNU/Hurd 2013 Release Brings New Packages
  3. KDE 4.11 Will Be The Last Major KDE4 Workspaces...
  4. Raspberry Pi Gets New Wayland Weston Renderer
  5. X.Org Libraries Hit By Round Of Security Issues
  6. Chrome 27 Loads Web Pages Faster
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite