1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

The Performance Of EXT4 Then & Now

Michael Larabel

Published on 19 January 2010
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 6 - 42 Comments

Over the past week there has been a lot of talk about the EXT4 file-system following the announcement that Google is migrating their EXT2 file-systems to EXT4. Their reasons for this transition to EXT4 are attributed to the easy migration process and Google engineers are pleased with this file-system's performance. However, as we mentioned in that news post last week and in many other articles over the past weeks and months, EXT4 is not as great of a contender as it was in the past, well, for some tests at least. The performance of the EXT4 file-system commonly goes down with new kernel releases and not up, as kernel developers continue to introduce new safeguards to address potential data loss problems that initially plagued some EXT4 users. For our latest EXT4 benchmarks we have numbers that show this file-system's performance using a vanilla 2.6.28 kernel (when EXT4 was marked as stable) and then every major kernel release up through the latest Linux 2.6.33 release candidate.

We had installed Ubuntu 9.04 for this testing and left everything in its stock configuration except for swapping out the kernels. The kernels we used for testing were all obtained from the Ubuntu kernel mainline PPA. These kernels were the 64-bit versions of the 2.6.28, 2.6.29, 2.6.30, 2.6.31, 2.6.32, and 2.6.33-rc4 releases. We tested out a Linux 2.6.33 kernel release candidate as Phoromatic Tracker running in our kernel test farm had found a few performance drops on a solid-state drive with the EXT4 file-system in the current kernel development cycle, with new results being uploaded daily via Phoromatic at kernel-tracker.phoromatic.com. The EXT4 file-system mount options were left at their defaults (though at the end of this article we also have some results using the nobarrier mount option).

This latest round of file-system testing used the IOzone, Threaded I/O Tester, PostgreSQL, PostMark, Dbench, AIO-Stress, and FS-Mark tests, which were run under the Phoronix Test Suite. The system for this testing was an ASRock ION 330HT-BD NetTop with an Intel Atom 330 processor clocked at 1.80GHz (overclocked), ASRock AMCP7AION-HT motherboard, 2GB of system memory, NVIDIA GeForce 9400M ION graphics, and a 320GB Seagate ST9320325AS SATA HDD.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Scythe Mugen MAX
  2. Intel Core i7 5960X Haswell-E On Linux
  3. Intel 80GB 530 Series M.2 SSD On Linux
  4. With A New Motherboard, The Core i7 5960X Haswell-E Lights Up
Latest Linux Articles
  1. RadeonSI GLAMOR Benchmarks With X.Org Server 1.16
  2. RadeonSI Gallium3D vs. Catalyst At 4K UHD On Linux
  3. MSAA RadeonSI Gallium3D Performance Preview
  4. Intel Core i7 5960X CPU Core Scaling Under Linux
Latest Linux News
  1. The KMS Mode-Setting Driver Was Imported For X.Org Server 1.17
  2. SNA & UXA Intel Benchmarks With X.Org Server 1.16
  3. Graphics Driver Changes Coming In The Linux 3.18 Kernel
  4. Tropico 5 Being Released For Linux Gamers This Week
  5. Eclipse IDE Starts Firing Up On Wayland's Weston
  6. OpenSUSE Announcement On SUSE's Recent Merger
  7. Valve Begins Publicly Tracking AMD Catalyst Linux Issues
  8. Digia Qt Spinoff Is Called "The Qt Company"
  9. GNOME 3.14 Makes More Progress In Running Natively On Wayland
  10. Minix 3.3 Released With Cortex-A8 ARM Support, NetBSD Userland Compatibility
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  2. Stop grabbing my keyboard :(
  3. New Group Calls For Boycotting Systemd
  4. Best Radeon for a Power Mac G5?
  5. New stress testing utility for GPU's
  6. Hd 6850
  7. support for first generation UVD blocks (RV6xx, RS780, RS880 and RV790)
  8. Nvidia joins the ranks of Apple and Microsoft