EXT4, Btrfs, NILFS2 Performance Benchmarks
When carrying out 64MB reads with 32 threads, the latency was very similar between XFS, EXT3, EXT4, and Btrfs. EXT3 had a latency of merely 13 microseconds while XFS and EXT4 were just one microsecond slower. With this test profile, NILFS2 has a rather significant problem as its average latency was 461 microseconds.
A similar issue with NILFS2 was also spotted when it came to 64MB random reads using the Threaded I/O Tester. XFS, EXT3, and EXT4 had average latencies of five microseconds and Btrfs came in fourth with a time of 26 microseconds. With a glacially slow, last place finish was NILFS2 with a time of 919 microseconds.
When increasing the read size from 64MB to 256MB, but sticking with 32 tiotest threads, NILFS2 remained the slowest but by a much more reasonable margin. XFS was the fastest here followed by EXT4 and just behind that was EXT3 and then Btrfs.
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
Latest Linux Articles
Latest Linux News
Latest Forum Discussions