1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking Benchmarking Platform
Phoromatic Test Orchestration

Can DragonFlyBSD's HAMMER Compete With Btrfs, ZFS?

Michael Larabel

Published on 7 January 2011
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 2 of 3 - 29 Comments

The disk read performance with BlogBench did the worst by far with the HAMMER file-system. When maintaining the same DragonFlyBSD 2.8.2 stack but switching from HAMMER to the UFS file-system, the performance was actually improved by nearly five times. Interestingly though, UFS on PC-BSD 8.1 was much faster than UFS on DragonFlyBSD either due to differences in the UFS implementation or with the disk/SATA sub-system between these distinct BSD operating systems. Like the HAMMER results, the performance of PC-BSD with a root ZFS file-system was actually slower than using UFS. Meanwhile, all of the tested Linux file-systems were much faster than ZFS and HAMMER on BSD. The performance of EXT4 and Btrfs were neck-and-neck.

While HAMMER did not have any advantages over UFS when it came to the read performance in BlogBench, the HAMMER write performance in this test profile was much faster than the classic BSD file-system. The UFS performance on DragonFlyBSD continued to be slower than UFS on PC-BSD, but HAMMER was able to outperform UFS on PC-BSD and even ZFS on PC-BSD, which itself was slower than UFS. BSD and HAMMER though was still no match for the EXT3/EXT4/Btrfs that all performed much stronger. Interestingly though, with this test the Btrfs performance fell greatly behind EXT4.

The Gzip compression test is not too interesting, but Linux and its file-systems continue to command the lead.

With the PostMark test, HAMMER on DragonFlyBSD was five times faster than UFS on the same operating system. The performance of HAMMER under DragonFlyBSD though fell short of ZFS on PC-BSD. The ZFS performance in turn was not too far behind EXT3 on Linux, but EXT4 and Btrfs were both multiple times faster.

Latest Articles & Reviews
  1. Sub-$20 802.11n USB WiFi Adapter That's Linux Friendly
  2. The Lenovo T450s Is Working Beautifully With Linux
  3. Linux 4.0 SSD EXT4 / Btrfs / XFS / F2FS Benchmarks
  4. Linux 4.0 Hard Drive Comparison With Six File-Systems
  5. Lenovo ThinkPad T450s Broadwell Preview
  6. How Open-Source Allowed Valve To Implement VULKAN Much Faster On The Source 2 Engine
Latest Linux News
  1. EXT4 In Linux 4.1 Adds File-System Level Encryption
  2. Open-Source Ardour 4.0 Audio Software Has Big Improvements
  3. Linux-Powered Endless Computer Raises $100k+ In A Few Days
  4. GCC 5.1 RC2 Arrives, GCC 5.1 Planned For Next Week
  5. F2FS For Linux 4.1 Has New Features & Fixes
  6. Phoronix Server Upgrade This Weekend: Dual Haswell Xeons, 96GB DDR4
  7. Google's Experimental QUIC Transport Protocol Is Showing Promise
  8. Red Hat Joins Khronos, The Group Behind OpenGL & Vulkan
  9. NetworkManager Drops WiMAX Support
  10. Wine 1.7.41 Works More On Kernel Job Objects, MSI Patches
Most Viewed News This Week
  1. Nouveau: NVIDIA's New Hardware Is "VERY Open-Source Unfriendly"
  2. Linux 4.0 Kernel Released
  3. Microsoft Announces An LLVM-Based Compiler For .NET
  4. Linux 4.1 Brings Many Potentially Risky x86/ASM Changes
  5. VirtualBox 5.0 Beta 2 Released
  6. KDBUS Is Taking A Lot Of Heat, Might Be Delayed From Mainline Linux Kernel
  7. Mozilla Start Drafting Plans To Deprecate Insecure HTTP
  8. LibreOffice 4.5 Bumped To Become LibreOffice 5.0