1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Chromium OS, Moblin, Ubuntu Netbook Remix Benchmarks

Michael Larabel

Published on 23 November 2009
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 7 of 7 - 25 Comments

Well, these results were certainly interesting to say the least and surprised us in some areas. When it came to our netbook performance tests from the desktop, there were not too many dissenting test results between the gaming, video playback, encoding, and disk test profiles. However, for those tests that did differ, Ubuntu Netbook Remix 9.10 usually came out in front as being the best performer. The use of the EXT3 file-system by default in Intel's Moblin and Google's Chromium OS caused them to suffer in some of the tests compared to the others running with EXT4. That is about all there is to say from those initial system benchmarks of Chromium OS as well as Moblin 2.1, Ubuntu Netbook Remix 9.10, Fedora 12, and openSUSE 11.2 looked at all together.

When it came to looking at the battery power consumption rate for the five Linux distributions running on the Atom netbook with solid-state storage, Chromium OS consumed the most power without a doubt. However, as we showed in one of the graphs, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology does not appear to be functioning appropriately with this Google netbook operating system, which at least partially explains why Chromium OS is going through much more power. During the test looking at the power consumption when idling, then signaling off the display, and then playing back a video file, Ubuntu Netbook Remix 9.10 consumed the least amount of power overall. When monitoring the power consumption during idling, compress-7zip, ffmpeg, and then the OpenArena test profile, openSUSE 11.2 by far did the best with conserving the battery.

Another system sensor that was tracked by the Phoronix Test Suite was the CPU usage percent, which showed openSUSE 11.2 to have the highest CPU usage overall while Ubuntu Netbook Remix 9.10 had the lowest. We also looked at the system temperature during testing and overall openSUSE 11.2 ran the coolest while Moblin 2.1 ran the warmest. Lastly, our memory usage results show Ubuntu Netbook Remix doing the best while openSUSE did the worst. There appears to be a very significant spike in memory usage under openSUSE 11.2 when running the OpenGL test.

It is far too early to say how Google's Chromium OS will perform in the end considering that it is roughly a year out from shipping with any netbooks or other devices. Our first benchmarks of Chromium OS show that its system performance is nothing too spectacular at this time, but we will certainly be looking at its performance again as this Google distribution matures. From all of the tests carried out in this article, overall Ubuntu Netbook Remix 9.10 did the best, but openSUSE 11.2 had many strong areas too, especially for being a desktop distribution that was just loaded onto the Samsung netbook. It was rather surprising though to see Moblin 2.1 fall behind in many of the tests, considering all of the work that Intel has invested into Moblin and optimizing it to run on their hardware. Moblin 2.1 may sport a beautiful interface (that is now available in Ubuntu, Fedora, and other distribution repositories), but it looks like they could do with some more performance optimization work.

Discuss these results in the Phoronix Forums, try out the Phoronix Test Suite if you want to run these tests yourself, and when shopping this holiday season do not forget to use our shopping links or subscribe to Phoronix Premium for viewing entire articles (like this one) on a single page and viewing this site without any advertisements. Also follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Identi.ca to stay up with our latest test results.

7
Next Page >>
About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. MSI X99S SLI PLUS On Linux
  2. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 Offers Great Linux Performance
  3. CompuLab Intense-PC2: An Excellent, Fanless, Mini PC Powered By Intel's i7 Haswell
  4. From The Atom 330 To Haswell ULT: Intel Linux Performance Benchmarks
Latest Linux Articles
  1. RunAbove: A POWER8 Compute Cloud With Offerings Up To 176 Threads
  2. 6-Way Ubuntu 14.10 Linux Desktop Benchmarks
  3. Ubuntu 14.10 XMir System Compositor Benchmarks
  4. Btrfs RAID HDD Testing On Ubuntu Linux 14.10
Latest Linux News
  1. openSUSE Factory & Tumbleweed Are Merging
  2. More Fedora Delays: Fedora 21 Beta Slips
  3. Mono Brings C# To The Unreal Engine 4
  4. Coreboot Now Has Support For Intel Broadwell Hardware
  5. Enlightenment's EFL 1.12 Alpha Has Evas GL-DRM Engine, OpenGL ES 1.1 Support
  6. GTK+ Lands Experimental Backend For Mir Display Server
  7. Ubuntu 14.10 Officially Released
  8. Mesa 10.4 Might Re-Enable HyperZ For R600g/RadeonSI
  9. Intel GVT-g GPU Virtualization Moves Closer
  10. GTK+ 3.16 To Bring Several New Features
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  2. Ubuntu 16.04 Might Be The Distribution's Last 32-Bit Release
  3. Linux hacker compares Solaris kernel code:
  4. HOPE: The Ease Of Python With The Speed Of C++
  5. Advertisements On Phoronix
  6. Users/Developers Threatening Fork Of Debian GNU/Linux
  7. AMD Releases UVD Video Decode Support For R600 GPUs
  8. Proof that strlcpy is un-needed