1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

CentOS 5.4 vs. OpenSuSE 11.2 vs. Ubuntu 9.10 Benchmarks

Michael Larabel

Published on 2 November 2009
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 7 - 21 Comments

With the release of CentOS 5.4 last month to bring this community enterprise operating system on par with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.4, we decided it was a good time to see how the server / workstation performance between this new CentOS release compares to that of Ubuntu 9.10, which was released last week, and also how it performs up against the release candidate of OpenSuSE 11.2. In this article are these benchmarks.

The server and workstation oriented benchmarks we ran in this article across these three distributions were Apache, PostgreSQL, SQLite, Dbench, IOzone, Threaded I/O Tester, C-Ray, GraphicsMagick, John The Ripper, timed MAFFT alignment, GROMACS MD, NAS Parallel Benchmarks, and SPECViewPerf 9. All of these tests were run through the Phoronix Test Suite with Bardu Beta 1. CentOS 5.4, OpenSuSE 11.2 RC1, and Ubuntu 9.10 were all tested with their default packages and settings, with the exception of disabling SELinux on CentOS.

CentOS 5.4 is shipping with an updated Linux 2.6.18 kernel, GNOME 2.16.0 desktop, X Server 7.1.1, NVIDIA 190.29 display driver, GCC 4.1.2, and uses an EXT3 file-system by default. OpenSuSE 11.2 RC1 runs with the Linux 2.6.31 kernel, GNOME 2.28.0, X Server 1.6.5, NVIDIA 190.29 display driver, GCC 4.4, and uses the newer EXT4 file-system by default. Lastly, with Ubuntu 9.10 we have the Linux 2.6.31 kernel, GNOME 2.28.0, X Server 1.6.4, NVIDIA 190.29 display driver, GCC 4.4.1, and an EXT4 file-system. For all three Linux distributions we were using the x86_64 builds. The final releases of Ubuntu and CentOS were used, but due to OpenSuSE 11.2 not yet being officially available, we had used its first release candidate. The hardware for this test system was made up of an Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 clocked at 3.00GHz, a Gigabyte EP45T-DS3R motherboard (P45 + ICH10R), 2GB of DDR3 memory, a 160GB Western Digital WD1600JS-00M, and a NVIDIA GeForce 8600GTS 256MB graphics card.

Latest Articles & Reviews
  1. Kubuntu 15.04 Is Turning Out Quite Nice, Good Way To Try Out The Latest KDE
  2. 5-Way Linux Distribution Comparison On The Core i3 NUC
  3. OCZ ARC 100 Linux SSD Benchmarks
  4. Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Works Great As A Linux Ultrabook
  5. Transcend SSD370 256GB
  6. Linux 3.19 File-System Tests Of EXT4, Btrfs, XFS & F2FS
Latest Linux News
  1. ALSA 1.0.29 Released
  2. Ubuntu 15.04 Beta Released, Ubuntu MATE Made Official
  3. Coreboot Developer: Purism Doesn't Deliver On Libre Firmware
  4. LLVM 3.6 & Clang 3.6 Deliver More Features, Complete C++14 Support
  5. The Most Popular Open-Source Linux Benchmarks
  6. The Tremendous Features Of Fedora 22
  7. Krita 2.9 Released, Their Biggest Release Ever
  8. RISC OS Now Works With The Raspberry Pi 2
  9. A Single UEFI Executable With The Linux Kernel, Initrd & Command Line
  10. Unigine 2.0 Beta Brings Performance Optimizations, Oculus Rift DK2 Support
Most Viewed News This Week
  1. Linux 4.0-RC1 Tagged, Linux 4.0 Will Bring Many Notable Improvements
  2. Screenshots Of The GNOME 3.16 Changes
  3. Linux 4.0 Doesn't Have The Weirdest Codename
  4. Mir Now Depends Upon C++14
  5. GNOME 3.16 Beta Brings Wayland-Based Log-in Screen
  6. LLVM Clang Compiling The Linux Kernel Is A Big Topic For 2015
  7. Linux BIOS/UEFI Updating Is Going To Get Much Better With UEFI 2.5
  8. Canonical Comes Up With Its Own FUSE Filesystem For Linux Containers
%%CLICK_URL_UNESC%%