1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

CentOS 5.4 vs. OpenSuSE 11.2 vs. Ubuntu 9.10 Benchmarks

Michael Larabel

Published on 2 November 2009
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 7 - 21 Comments

With the release of CentOS 5.4 last month to bring this community enterprise operating system on par with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.4, we decided it was a good time to see how the server / workstation performance between this new CentOS release compares to that of Ubuntu 9.10, which was released last week, and also how it performs up against the release candidate of OpenSuSE 11.2. In this article are these benchmarks.

The server and workstation oriented benchmarks we ran in this article across these three distributions were Apache, PostgreSQL, SQLite, Dbench, IOzone, Threaded I/O Tester, C-Ray, GraphicsMagick, John The Ripper, timed MAFFT alignment, GROMACS MD, NAS Parallel Benchmarks, and SPECViewPerf 9. All of these tests were run through the Phoronix Test Suite with Bardu Beta 1. CentOS 5.4, OpenSuSE 11.2 RC1, and Ubuntu 9.10 were all tested with their default packages and settings, with the exception of disabling SELinux on CentOS.

CentOS 5.4 is shipping with an updated Linux 2.6.18 kernel, GNOME 2.16.0 desktop, X Server 7.1.1, NVIDIA 190.29 display driver, GCC 4.1.2, and uses an EXT3 file-system by default. OpenSuSE 11.2 RC1 runs with the Linux 2.6.31 kernel, GNOME 2.28.0, X Server 1.6.5, NVIDIA 190.29 display driver, GCC 4.4, and uses the newer EXT4 file-system by default. Lastly, with Ubuntu 9.10 we have the Linux 2.6.31 kernel, GNOME 2.28.0, X Server 1.6.4, NVIDIA 190.29 display driver, GCC 4.4.1, and an EXT4 file-system. For all three Linux distributions we were using the x86_64 builds. The final releases of Ubuntu and CentOS were used, but due to OpenSuSE 11.2 not yet being officially available, we had used its first release candidate. The hardware for this test system was made up of an Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 clocked at 3.00GHz, a Gigabyte EP45T-DS3R motherboard (P45 + ICH10R), 2GB of DDR3 memory, a 160GB Western Digital WD1600JS-00M, and a NVIDIA GeForce 8600GTS 256MB graphics card.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. MSI X99S SLI PLUS On Linux
  2. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 Offers Great Linux Performance
  3. CompuLab Intense-PC2: An Excellent, Fanless, Mini PC Powered By Intel's i7 Haswell
  4. From The Atom 330 To Haswell ULT: Intel Linux Performance Benchmarks
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Open-Source Radeon 2D Performance Is Better With Ubuntu 14.10
  2. RunAbove: A POWER8 Compute Cloud With Offerings Up To 176 Threads
  3. 6-Way Ubuntu 14.10 Linux Desktop Benchmarks
  4. Ubuntu 14.10 XMir System Compositor Benchmarks
Latest Linux News
  1. KDE With Theoretical Client-Side Decorations, Windows 10 Influence
  2. Sandusky Lee: Great Cabinets For Storing All Your Computer Gear
  3. Fedora 21 Beta & Final Release Slip Further
  4. Mesa 10.3.2 Has A Couple Bug-Fixes
  5. RadeonSI/R600g HyperZ Support Gets Turned Back On
  6. openSUSE Factory & Tumbleweed Are Merging
  7. More Fedora Delays: Fedora 21 Beta Slips
  8. Mono Brings C# To The Unreal Engine 4
  9. Coreboot Now Has Support For Intel Broadwell Hardware
  10. Enlightenment's EFL 1.12 Alpha Has Evas GL-DRM Engine, OpenGL ES 1.1 Support
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Debian Is Back To Discussing Init Systems, Freedom of Choice
  2. AMD Radeon VDPAU Video Performance With Gallium3D
  3. HOPE: The Ease Of Python With The Speed Of C++
  4. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  5. Ubuntu 16.04 Might Be The Distribution's Last 32-Bit Release
  6. Linux hacker compares Solaris kernel code:
  7. Advertisements On Phoronix
  8. Users/Developers Threatening Fork Of Debian GNU/Linux