1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

CentOS 5.4 vs. OpenSuSE 11.2 vs. Ubuntu 9.10 Benchmarks

Michael Larabel

Published on 2 November 2009
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 7 - 21 Comments

With the release of CentOS 5.4 last month to bring this community enterprise operating system on par with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.4, we decided it was a good time to see how the server / workstation performance between this new CentOS release compares to that of Ubuntu 9.10, which was released last week, and also how it performs up against the release candidate of OpenSuSE 11.2. In this article are these benchmarks.

The server and workstation oriented benchmarks we ran in this article across these three distributions were Apache, PostgreSQL, SQLite, Dbench, IOzone, Threaded I/O Tester, C-Ray, GraphicsMagick, John The Ripper, timed MAFFT alignment, GROMACS MD, NAS Parallel Benchmarks, and SPECViewPerf 9. All of these tests were run through the Phoronix Test Suite with Bardu Beta 1. CentOS 5.4, OpenSuSE 11.2 RC1, and Ubuntu 9.10 were all tested with their default packages and settings, with the exception of disabling SELinux on CentOS.

CentOS 5.4 is shipping with an updated Linux 2.6.18 kernel, GNOME 2.16.0 desktop, X Server 7.1.1, NVIDIA 190.29 display driver, GCC 4.1.2, and uses an EXT3 file-system by default. OpenSuSE 11.2 RC1 runs with the Linux 2.6.31 kernel, GNOME 2.28.0, X Server 1.6.5, NVIDIA 190.29 display driver, GCC 4.4, and uses the newer EXT4 file-system by default. Lastly, with Ubuntu 9.10 we have the Linux 2.6.31 kernel, GNOME 2.28.0, X Server 1.6.4, NVIDIA 190.29 display driver, GCC 4.4.1, and an EXT4 file-system. For all three Linux distributions we were using the x86_64 builds. The final releases of Ubuntu and CentOS were used, but due to OpenSuSE 11.2 not yet being officially available, we had used its first release candidate. The hardware for this test system was made up of an Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 clocked at 3.00GHz, a Gigabyte EP45T-DS3R motherboard (P45 + ICH10R), 2GB of DDR3 memory, a 160GB Western Digital WD1600JS-00M, and a NVIDIA GeForce 8600GTS 256MB graphics card.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Trying The Configurable 45 Watt TDP With AMD's A10-7800 / A6-7400K
  2. Sumo's Omni Gets Reloaded
  3. AMD A10-7800 & A6-7400K APUs Run Great On Linux
  4. Radeon Gallium3D Is Running Increasingly Well Against AMD's Catalyst Driver
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Open-Source Radeon Graphics Have Some Improvements On Linux 3.17
  2. CPUFreq Scaling Tests With AMD's Kaveri On Linux 3.16
  3. Enabling HyperZ Is Still An Easy Way For Faster RadeonSI Performance
  4. AMD Kaveri: Catalyst vs. RadeonSI Gallium3D On Linux
Latest Linux News
  1. Khronos Publishes Its Slides About OpenGL-Next
  2. Qt5 Will Now Support LGPLv3 Modules
  3. Proposed: A Tainted Performance State For The Linux Kernel
  4. Systemd 216 Piles On More Features, Aims For New User-Space VT
  5. Mesa 10.2.6 Has Plenty Of OpenGL Driver Bug Fixes
  6. LXQt 0.8 Is Being Released Soon
  7. Linux 3.17 Lands Memfd, A KDBUS Prerequisite
  8. Humble Jumbo Bundle 2 Shafts Linux Gamers
  9. New VM Software Claims To Be 4.5x Faster Than QEMU
  10. Btrfs Gets Talked Up, Googler Encourages You To Try Btrfs
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Remote gui not accessible in Phoronix Test Suite 5.2
  2. The dangers of Linux kernel development
  3. Dead Island for Linux (?)
  4. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  5. AMD Offers Mantle For OpenGL-Next, Pushes Mantle To Workstations
  6. Next-Gen OpenGL To Be Announced Next Month
  7. OpenGL 4.5 Released With New Features
  8. Updated graphics drivers for Ubuntu 12.04 Precise LTS