1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Benchmarks Of The Gentoo-Based Calculate Linux Desktop

Michael Larabel

Published on 2 August 2010
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 2 of 6 - 81 Comments

One of the first complaints we had about Calculate Linux Desktop 10.4 was its use of an older Mesa release (v7.5.2) by default. With the rate that the various open-source graphics drivers have been maturing along with core Mesa and the Gallium3D driver architecture, Mesa 7.5.2 is quite out of date even though it was released in September of 2009. Calculate Linux Desktop 10.4 was released this past April and it certainly would have been nicer to see Mesa 7.7 or even Mesa 7.8 used as the default. Of course, users can upgrade the Mesa stack themselves on Calculate Linux Desktop from Gentoo Portage if they are not using the proprietary NVIDIA or ATI drivers. With this older Mesa stack by default, we were only able to test the Samsung NC10 with its Intel graphics but not the AMD system using the newer ATI R700 graphics with these first OpenGL benchmarks.

Calculate Linux Desktop 10.4 with Mesa 7.5.2 ran at around the same speed of Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, which used Mesa 7.7.1, but it was not quite as fast as Sabayon 5.3 that uses Mesa 7.8.1. Fedora 13 also used Mesa 7.8.1 but its frame-rate was barely better than that of Calculate / Ubuntu.

With World of Padman, Calculate Linux Desktop 10.4 and its older Mesa was actually much faster than the other distributions with this ioquake3-based game. Oddly, Sabayon and Fedora with its most up-to-date Intel DRI driver were actually much slower than Calculate and Ubuntu that is still one major release series behind. It looks like there may be some regressions entered into Mesa that are hampering the OpenGL performance in this game.

With our first non-graphics test, on the Intel Atom netbook the fastest 32-bit distribution for the 7-Zip test was Calculate Linux Desktop, but the difference between it and the three other Linux desktops were statistically insignificant. Fedora 13 was the fastest on the 64-bit AMD system, but again the results between the four tested distributions were too close to call a decisive winner.

Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. AMD's New Athlon/Semprons Give Old Phenom CPUs A Big Run For The Money
  2. 13-Way Low-End GPU Comparison With AMD's AM1 Athlon
  3. ASUS AM1I-A: A Mini-ITX Board For Socketed Kabini APUs
  4. Mini-Box M350: A Simple, Affordable Mini-ITX Case
Latest Linux Articles
  1. How Much Video RAM Is Needed For Catalyst R3 Graphics?
  2. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS vs. 14.04 LTS Cloud Benchmarks
  3. Ubuntu 12.04.4 vs. 13.10 vs. 14.04 LTS Desktop Benchmarks
  4. AMD OpenCL Performance With AM1 Kabini APUs
Latest Linux News
  1. Oracle Linux 6.5 vs. Oracle Linux 7.0 Beta Benchmarks
  2. Easter Yields The Linux 3.15-rc2 Kernel Release
  3. The Most Amazing OpenGL Tech Demo In 64kb
  4. Packard Bell LM85 Now Supported By Coreboot
  5. AmazonBasics External USB 2.0 DVD Writer For Linux
  6. TP-LINK TG-3468: A $12 Linux PCI-E Gigabit Network Adapter
  7. Linux 3.15 Lands Some DRM Graphics Driver Fixes
  8. AMD Is Disabling DPM Support For RV770 GPUs
  9. ReactOS Working On A Community Windows OS
  10. eRacks Keeps Pushing Linux, Open-Source Systems After 15 Years
  11. Borderlands Is Being Considered For Linux
  12. Mesa 10.0 & 10.1 Stable Get Updated
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. The GNOME Foundation Is Running Short On Money
  2. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  3. Catalyst 14.3 Beta
  4. Suggestions about how to make a Radeon HD 7790 work decently?
  5. Radeon 8000M problematic on Linux?
  6. Linux Kernel Developers Fed Up With Ridiculous Bugs In Systemd
  7. After Jack Keane, RuseSoft will briing Ankh 3 to Linux through Desura
  8. Suspected PHP Proxy Issue