1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Benchmarks Of The Btrfs Space Cache Option

Michael Larabel

Published on 24 December 2010
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 4 of 4 - 21 Comments

When the Dbench client count was set to 12, the benefits of using space_cache were much smaller but still measurable. There was also a small improvement tacked onto the compress results when using both mount options.

Using the compress mount option more than tripled the write performance with FS-Mark while the space_cache option only enhanced the Btrfs file-system performance by a tiny bit.

With 64MB random writes using 32 threads on Threaded I/O Tester, the space_cache option provided for some improvements while again the compress option resulted in a much more dramatic speed-up.

Lastly, with AO-Stress, the space_cache mount option was worthwhile but not as comparatively great as using the compress option.

Overall, the space_cache option when using the Btrfs file-system on Linux 2.6.37+ kernels will result in improved performance. However, in two of the tests there were odd performance regressions when pairing the space_cache and compress mount options. One of the only other drawbacks to using space_cache on Btrfs is that when the file-system is mounted with this option, the file-system can no longer be mounted later on by any pre-2.6.37 kernels due to the disk format changing. The compress mount option continues to work very well for speeding up the Btrfs performance in nearly every test. Going forward though the space_cache option is great and eventually will hopefully be used by default.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Trying The Configurable 45 Watt TDP With AMD's A10-7800 / A6-7400K
  2. Sumo's Omni Gets Reloaded
  3. AMD A10-7800 & A6-7400K APUs Run Great On Linux
  4. Radeon Gallium3D Is Running Increasingly Well Against AMD's Catalyst Driver
Latest Linux Articles
  1. CPUFreq Scaling Tests With AMD's Kaveri On Linux 3.16
  2. Enabling HyperZ Is Still An Easy Way For Faster RadeonSI Performance
  3. AMD Kaveri: Catalyst vs. RadeonSI Gallium3D On Linux
  4. Linux OpenCL Performance With The Newest AMD & NVIDIA Drivers
Latest Linux News
  1. Qt5 Will Now Support LGPLv3 Modules
  2. Proposed: A Tainted Performance State For The Linux Kernel
  3. Systemd 216 Piles On More Features, Aims For New User-Space VT
  4. Mesa 10.2.6 Has Plenty Of OpenGL Driver Bug Fixes
  5. Wasteland 2 Gets An Official Release Date
  6. Dead Island For Linux Appears Imminent
  7. LXQt 0.8 Is Being Released Soon
  8. Linux 3.17 Lands Memfd, A KDBUS Prerequisite
  9. Humble Jumbo Bundle 2 Shafts Linux Gamers
  10. Ubuntu 14.10's Feature Freeze Is This Wednesday
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Remote gui not accessible in Phoronix Test Suite 5.2
  2. The dangers of Linux kernel development
  3. Dead Island for Linux (?)
  4. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  5. AMD Offers Mantle For OpenGL-Next, Pushes Mantle To Workstations
  6. Next-Gen OpenGL To Be Announced Next Month
  7. OpenGL 4.5 Released With New Features
  8. Updated graphics drivers for Ubuntu 12.04 Precise LTS