1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking Benchmarking Platform
Phoromatic Test Orchestration

BFS Scheduler Benchmarks

Michael Larabel

Published on 14 September 2009
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 4 of 4 - 105 Comments

The disk latency greatly increased under BFS. Carrying out eight threads of 16MB random writes resulted in the latency going from 23 microseconds under CFS to 33 seconds with BFS.

When looking at eight threads of 16MB reads (instead of random writes) the latency was still higher with BFS, but it was just 14.66 vs. 16.00 microseconds.

While BFS lost with the Threaded I/O Tester disk benchmark, it won with the PostMark test profile. The BFS scheduler delivered just fewer than 5% more transactions per second than the Completely Fair Scheduler.

Nine tests carried out on a single low-end system (we may carry out more tests on multiple systems if there is sufficient interest) is not enough to call one scheduler better than the other. However, based upon these numbers and the feedback from many others that have been testing out the Brain Fuck Scheduler, it does appear that BFS does have a sweet spot for most desktops (aside from the disk slowdowns). While we had not run into any stability issues, stalls, or other problems, others have encountered such issues with BFS being very young. The BFS scheduler does have a lot of potential as being the scheduler for Linux desktops, but at this time, Con Kolivas is not pursuing this for mainline integration. Should be change his mind or other kernel changes come because of his reappearance, we will be sure to keep you posted.

If you have tried out BFS, be sure to share your experiences in the Phoronix Forums.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux News
  1. Intel Has More Graphics Code For Testing, Plans For Linux 4.3
  2. GTK+ File Chooser Receiving Many Improvements
  3. Mesa 10.5.9 Is The Last Of The Series
  4. Trying To Run The Intel Core i7 5775C On Linux
  5. VirtualBox 5.0 RC3 Brings VMM Fixes, Takes Care Of Some KDE DnD Problems
  6. Ubuntu Is Finally Fixing Its Annoying GRUB Setting
  7. Firefox 39.0 Brings New Features, HTML5 Changes
  8. OPNsense 15.7 Released As Fork Of Pfsense
  9. The Less-Powerful Intel Compute Stick With Ubuntu Will Soon Ship
  10. Kodi 15.0 Release Candidate 1 Arrives
Latest Articles & Reviews
  1. 6-Way File-System Comparison On The Linux 4.1 Kernel
  2. How KDE VDG Is Trying To Make Open-Source Software Beautiful
  3. Attempting To Try Out BCache On The Linux 4.1 Kernel
  4. CompuLab's Fitlet Is A Very Tiny, Fanless, Linux PC With AMD A10 Micro
Most Viewed News This Week
  1. Pinos Is For Linux Video What PulseAudio Is For Audio
  2. The State & Complications Of Porting The Unity Editor To Linux
  3. The Staging Pull For Linux 4.2: "Big, Really Big"
  4. Latest Rumor Pegs Microsoft Wanting To Buy AMD
  5. "PulseVideo" Coming To Complement PulseAudio?
  6. Exciting Features Merged So Far For The Linux 4.2 Kernel
  7. RadeonSI Gallium3D Gets New OpenGL 4 Bits
  8. Linux 4.2 Advertises GFS2 Performance Improvements