1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking Benchmarking Platform
Phoromatic Test Orchestration

BFS Scheduler Benchmarks

Michael Larabel

Published on 14 September 2009
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 4 of 4 - 105 Comments

The disk latency greatly increased under BFS. Carrying out eight threads of 16MB random writes resulted in the latency going from 23 microseconds under CFS to 33 seconds with BFS.

When looking at eight threads of 16MB reads (instead of random writes) the latency was still higher with BFS, but it was just 14.66 vs. 16.00 microseconds.

While BFS lost with the Threaded I/O Tester disk benchmark, it won with the PostMark test profile. The BFS scheduler delivered just fewer than 5% more transactions per second than the Completely Fair Scheduler.

Nine tests carried out on a single low-end system (we may carry out more tests on multiple systems if there is sufficient interest) is not enough to call one scheduler better than the other. However, based upon these numbers and the feedback from many others that have been testing out the Brain Fuck Scheduler, it does appear that BFS does have a sweet spot for most desktops (aside from the disk slowdowns). While we had not run into any stability issues, stalls, or other problems, others have encountered such issues with BFS being very young. The BFS scheduler does have a lot of potential as being the scheduler for Linux desktops, but at this time, Con Kolivas is not pursuing this for mainline integration. Should be change his mind or other kernel changes come because of his reappearance, we will be sure to keep you posted.

If you have tried out BFS, be sure to share your experiences in the Phoronix Forums.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Articles & Reviews
  1. Radeon Linux Benchmarks: Catalyst 15.3 Beta vs. Linux 4.0 + Mesa 10.6-devel
  2. Trying Out The Modern Linux Desktops With 4 Monitors + AMD/NVIDIA Graphics
  3. Turning A Basement Into A Big Linux Server Room
  4. NVIDIA's $1000+ GeForce GTX TITAN X Delivers Maximum Linux Performance
  5. OS X 10.10 vs. Ubuntu 15.04 vs. Fedora 21 Tests: Linux Sweeps The Board
  6. The New Place Where Linux Code Is Constantly Being Benchmarked
Latest Linux News
  1. It's Been Five Years Since The Phoronix Visit To Chernobyl
  2. Vulkan, The New Linux Server Room & BioShock Won Linux Users In March
  3. Debian 8.0 Jessie Gets A Release Date
  4. Firefox 37 Coming Today With Heartbeat, HTTPS Bing
  5. OpenIndiana 2015.03 Updates Its Solaris/Illumos Environment
  6. GNOME 3.16 SDK Runtime Now Available
  7. Initial Intel Braxton Support Might Come To Linux 4.1
  8. Why KDE's KWin Doesn't Integrate Weston/QtCompositor For Wayland Support
  9. Clang Now Supports Targeting The NaCl OS
  10. PC-BSD Updates Its Lumina Desktop (v0.8.3)
Most Viewed News This Week
  1. The Big Features Of The Linux 4.0 Kernel
  2. Improved OpenCL Support For Blender's Cycles Renderer
  3. Open-Source Driver Fans Will Love NVIDIA's New OpenGL Demo
  4. Allwinner Continues Jerking Around The Open-Source Community
  5. GNOME 3.16 Released: It's Their Best Release Yet
  6. Ubuntu 15.04 Final Beta Released
  7. Nuclide: Facebook's New Unified IDE
  8. LibreOffice Online: A Cloud Version Of LibreOffice