1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

BFS Scheduler Benchmarks

Michael Larabel

Published on 14 September 2009
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 4 of 4 - 105 Comments

The disk latency greatly increased under BFS. Carrying out eight threads of 16MB random writes resulted in the latency going from 23 microseconds under CFS to 33 seconds with BFS.

When looking at eight threads of 16MB reads (instead of random writes) the latency was still higher with BFS, but it was just 14.66 vs. 16.00 microseconds.

While BFS lost with the Threaded I/O Tester disk benchmark, it won with the PostMark test profile. The BFS scheduler delivered just fewer than 5% more transactions per second than the Completely Fair Scheduler.

Nine tests carried out on a single low-end system (we may carry out more tests on multiple systems if there is sufficient interest) is not enough to call one scheduler better than the other. However, based upon these numbers and the feedback from many others that have been testing out the Brain Fuck Scheduler, it does appear that BFS does have a sweet spot for most desktops (aside from the disk slowdowns). While we had not run into any stability issues, stalls, or other problems, others have encountered such issues with BFS being very young. The BFS scheduler does have a lot of potential as being the scheduler for Linux desktops, but at this time, Con Kolivas is not pursuing this for mainline integration. Should be change his mind or other kernel changes come because of his reappearance, we will be sure to keep you posted.

If you have tried out BFS, be sure to share your experiences in the Phoronix Forums.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Articles & Reviews
  1. Samsung 850 EVO SSD Linux Benchmarks
  2. Kubuntu 15.04 Is Turning Out Quite Nice, Good Way To Try Out The Latest KDE
  3. 5-Way Linux Distribution Comparison On The Core i3 NUC
  4. OCZ ARC 100 Linux SSD Benchmarks
  5. Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Works Great As A Linux Ultrabook
  6. Transcend SSD370 256GB
Latest Linux News
  1. The Khronos Group Filed A Trademark On "Vulkan" API
  2. Mozilla Thunderbird Adoption Climbs, Thunderbird 38 In May
  3. The Most Popular Linux Benchmark Results On OpenBenchmarking.org
  4. Intel's Graphics Driver For Linux 4.1 Will Have More XenGT vGPU Support
  5. PlayOnLinux 4.2.6 Fixes A Number Of Issues
  6. Mesa 10.5-RC3 Now Available To Test Improved GPU Drivers
  7. New Specifications On The Alleged Ubuntu Tablet
  8. LLVM 3.6 Officially Released With Many Compiler Advantages
  9. VLC 2.2 "Weathermax" Brings Better VP9 & H.265 Support
  10. Open-Source .NET On Linux Continues Maturing
Most Viewed News This Week
  1. Linux 4.0-RC1 Tagged, Linux 4.0 Will Bring Many Notable Improvements
  2. Screenshots Of The GNOME 3.16 Changes
  3. More Proof That Allwinner Is Violating The GPL
  4. Linux 4.0 Doesn't Have The Weirdest Codename
  5. Mir Now Depends Upon C++14
  6. GNOME 3.16 Beta Brings Wayland-Based Log-in Screen
  7. Krita 2.9 Released, Their Biggest Release Ever
  8. LLVM Clang Compiling The Linux Kernel Is A Big Topic For 2015
%%CLICK_URL_UNESC%%