1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Arch Linux 2009.08 Benchmarks

Michael Larabel

Published on 14 August 2009
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 4 - 41 Comments

Arch Linux 2009.08 was released earlier this week with a new installer, more automatic configuration settings, many core package updates, and other changes to this growingly popular distribution. At the request of some readers, we have carried out some quick benchmarks to get a general understanding of where Arch Linux 2009.08 is performing in comparison to Ubuntu 9.04.

We were using Arch Linux 2009.08 (x86_64) with the Linux 2.6.30 kernel, GNOME 2.26, X Server 1.6.3, the NVIDIA 185.18.31 display driver, GCC 4.4.1, and an EXT4 file-system. In comparison, with our Ubuntu 9.04 (x86_64) tests were the Linux 2.6.28 kernel, GNOME 2.26.1, X Server 1.6.0, NVIDIA 185.18.31, GCC 4.3.3, and an EXT3 file-system. Our test system was an ASRock NetTop ION 330, which packs an Intel Atom 330 CPU, an ASRock AMCP7A-ION (NVIDIA MCP79) motherboard with GeForce 9400M graphics, and 2GB of DDR2 memory.

The benchmarks we ran for this quick comparison were World of Padman, Apache Benchmark, Ogg Encoding, timed HMMer Search, Threaded I/O Tester, PostMark, Dbench, GraphicsMagick, dcraw, and SQLite. With this testing we are just providing a quick overview of how -- in general -- Arch Linux compares to Ubuntu. If you would like to compare the performance of Arch Linux to other distributions or look at the performance in more detail, try out the Phoronix Test Suite.

Both Ubuntu 9.04 and Arch 2009.08 were using the same NVIDIA 185.18.31 driver, but Arch Linux managed to come out on top with the ioquake3-powered World of Padman. The NVIDIA GeForce 9400M ION is no powerful GPU, but under Arch Linux 2009.08 it had an average frame-rate of 54 FPS while under Ubuntu 9.04 it was at just below 50 FPS.

Arch Linux also came out on top with a slight lead when it came to benchmarking Apache. With this test profile, Arch 2009.08 was approximately 5% faster than Ubuntu.

With Ogg encoding, Arch Linux 2009.08 lost, but the difference was negligible at just 1%.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 & E5-2687W v3 Compared To The Core i7 5960X On Linux
  2. Intel 120GB 530 Series SSD Linux Performance
  3. Btrfs/EXT4/XFS/F2FS RAID 0/1/5/6/10 Linux Benchmarks On Four SSDs
  4. AMD's Windows Catalyst Driver Remains Largely Faster Than Linux Drivers
Latest Linux Articles
  1. NVIDIA vs. Nouveau Drivers With Linux 3.18 + Mesa 10.4-devel
  2. Is The Open-Source NVIDIA Driver Fast Enough For Steam On Linux Gaming?
  3. Linux 3.18 File-System Performance Minimally Changed But Possible Regressions
  4. AMD Radeon Gallium3D Is Catching Up & Sometimes Beating Catalyst On Linux
Latest Linux News
  1. Linux 3.18 Kernel: Not Much Change With Intel Haswell Performance
  2. More File-System Tests Of The Linux 3.18 Kernel
  3. Using NVIDIA's NVENC On Linux With FFmpeg
  4. There's Talk Again About An "Open To The Core" Ubuntu Laptop
  5. PowerVR SGX Driver Code Gets Leaked
  6. V2 Of KDBUS Published For Linux Kernel Review
  7. VirtualBox 4.3.20 Arrives, Still No Sign Of VirtualBox 4.4
  8. Scientific Linux 6.6 vs. Scientific Linux 7.0 Benchmarks
  9. Qualcomm Looks To Get Into The ARM Server Business
  10. HHVM 3.4 Adds New Features, Support
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Roadmap to Catalyst 14.10 ?
  2. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  3. Cant get working Kaveri APU - A10-7850k
  4. Debian Developer Resigns From The Systemd Maintainership Team
  5. Script for Fan Speed Control
  6. Debian Init System Coupling Vote Results
  7. The Slides Announcing The New "AMDGPU" Kernel Driver
  8. Ubuntu Developers Still Thinking What To Do About Adobe Flash Support