Ubuntu: Faster, But More Power Hungry Than Mac OS X?
Written by Michael Larabel in Software on 3 December 2010. Page 2 of 2. 28 Comments

When looking at something purely CPU bound rather than GPU focused, Mac OS X continued to go through less energy than Ubuntu 10.10 with its Linux 2.6.35 kernel. Ubuntu 10.10 was consuming 13% more power than Mac OS X 10.6.5 with C-Ray, which is a multi-threaded ray-tracing benchmark.

With the John The Ripper application, Ubuntu continued running faster than Mac OS X, but was going through more power: this time around two Watts more than the Apple OS. Of course, one can argue that Apple has the advantage here since it is their hardware, they only have to support a select number of configurations for their systems, where as Ubuntu and Linux in general has to support a whole spectrum of computers and devices.

Lastly, here is a composite graph looking at the results from idling and then running a number of Phoronix Test Suite test profiles, including the ones listed above. Again, Ubuntu finished most of its tests quicker than Mac OS X, but not without going through significantly more power. Stay tuned for the beginning of more Mac OS X performance tests next week, which goes into much further depth than this brief look at the power consumption.

About The Author
Author picture

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.

Related Articles
Featured Articles
Trending Linux News