1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Ubuntu: Faster, But More Power Hungry Than Mac OS X?

Michael Larabel

Published on 3 December 2010
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 2 - 28 Comments

Earlier this week I noted there's new Apple hardware in our labs being used to tighten up our Mac OS X support within the Phoronix Test Suite, OpenBenchmarking.org, Phoromatic, etc. However, in the middle of working on Iveland, I have been carrying out a few Mac OS X benchmarks comparing its performance under the 2010 Apple Mac Book Pro to other operating systems. With the Core i5 notebook being much faster than the past Apple Mac Minis used in comparisons like looking at their enhanced OpenGL stack and benchmarking Mac OS X against Linux and Windows 7, the results are more interesting and there's also a greater variety of testing possibilities now with the recent Phoronix Test Suite advancements. Next week there are some very interesting Apple-related benchmarks to be published, but before the weekend here are a few tests from this Apple Mac Book Pro looking at its power consumption under Mac OS X 10.6.5 and Ubuntu 10.10.

The Apple Mac Book Pro being used for this testing has an Intel Core i5 520M 2.4GHz processor, is labeled Apple Mac-F22586C8, has 4GB of DDR3-1066MHz system memory, provides a 320GB Hitachi HTS545032B9SA02 SATA hard drive, 1440 x 900 panel, and NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M (GT216) 256MB graphics. On the Mac OS X side, it had the 10.6.5 release with the 10.5.0 kernel, X.Org Server 1.4.2-apple56, the Apple-supplied NVIDIA graphics driver providing OpenGL 2.1, and a Journaled HFS+ file-system. Via BootCamp, there was Ubuntu 10.10 x86_64 with the Linux 2.6.35 kernel, X.Org Server 1.9.0, NVIDIA 260.19.06 display driver providing OpenGL 3.3.0, and an EXT4 file-system.

The comparative benchmarks coming out next week are looking at the performance of each operating system where as in this article we are solely looking at the battery's power consumption rate under each operating system with a variety of different scenarios. The Mac Book Pro battery monitoring was done via the Phoronix Test Suite as were the actual tests themselves. Each operating system was left with its default power management options besides disabling the dimming when running on battery power as both displays had dimmed to different levels. Besides installing NVIDIA's proprietary graphics driver, one of the only other changes made to either operating system was installing the Broadcom STA wireless driver via Ubuntu's Jockey for enabling the Apple WiFi support under Linux.

With the first test was the battery power consumption when running the OpenArena game under Mac OS X and Linux. The Ubuntu line is shorter since with the Linux proprietary driver its performance was that much faster than Mac OS X. Anyhow, while Ubuntu 10.10 with NVIDIA's binary blob may run much faster than Mac OS X, Ubuntu on average was consuming 10 more Watts than Mac OS X. The average power consumption during this gaming test under Mac OS X 10.6.5 on this Core i5 + GeForce GT 330M notebook was 39 Watts while with Ubuntu it was at 51 Watts. The peak power consumption was also much higher at 61 Watts where as with the Apple operating system it never topped 45 Watts.

The power consumption story was much the same when running Nexuiz: Mark Shuttleworth's operating system went through much more power than Steve Jobs' OS. If using the open-source Nouveau driver with its Gallium3D acceleration, Mac OS X would have commanded an even greater lead -- both for the power consumption and actual gaming performance. The Nouveau Gallium3D driver is still very slow and only recently has it even gained primitive power management support.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Trying The Configurable 45 Watt TDP With AMD's A10-7800 / A6-7400K
  2. Sumo's Omni Gets Reloaded
  3. AMD A10-7800 & A6-7400K APUs Run Great On Linux
  4. Radeon Gallium3D Is Running Increasingly Well Against AMD's Catalyst Driver
Latest Linux Articles
  1. Radeon Graphics Yield Mixed Results With Linux 3.17 Kernel
  2. AMD's RadeonSI Driver Sped Up A Lot This Summer
  3. Intel's Latest Linux Graphics Code Competes Against OS X 10.9
  4. Intel Sandy Bridge Gets A Surprise Boost From Linux 3.17
Latest Linux News
  1. Preview Of AMD Radeon R9 290 Hawaii Open-Source Performance
  2. Intel Bay Trail Performance With Linux 3.16/3.17 & Mesa 10.3
  3. EFL Sees A Ton Of Work Following Recent v1.11 Release
  4. ARM Talks Up Wayland For Mali
  5. GNOME/GTK+ Human Interface Guidelines Updated
  6. Robocraft Is Rolling Over To Linux
  7. The Widely-Criticized New Commercial Linux Distro Is Now On Kickstarter
  8. Wayland & Weston 1.6 Alpha Released
  9. A New First-Person Mystery Game Might Be Coming To Linux
  10. Patch By Patch, LLVM Clang Gets Better At Building The Linux Kernel
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Systemd 216 Piles On More Features, Aims For New User-Space VT
  2. Btrfs Gets Talked Up, Googler Encourages You To Try Btrfs
  3. OSS radeon driver for A10-7850K (Kaveri)
  4. Could be avoid to use flash for show the benchmark on the articles?
  5. American Citizens running AMOK for food stamps
  6. What Linux Distribution Should Be Benchmarked The Most?
  7. Company I work for is looking to contribute to Open Source projects... but wrongly?
  8. Microsoft vs. Campaign