Ubuntu 10.10 vs. Mac OS X 10.6.5: A Competitive Race

Published on December 06, 2010
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 7 of 7
Discuss This Article

Ubuntu 10.10 was also faster than Mac OS X 10.6.5 at the very simple test of timing how long it takes to extract the Linux kernel source-code package. These disk results though are not too surprising since they concur with our EXT4 vs. Journaled HFS+ file-system benchmarks from past articles.

Ubuntu and EXT4 really destroy Mac OS X and Journaled HFS+ when it comes to the PostMark benchmark where it is nearly ten times faster.

Mac OS X managed to pull a lead over Ubuntu 10.10 with a disk/file-system test when it came to running the PostgreSQL server where it was about four times faster than the Linux operating system.

Mac OS X 10.6.5 also managed a small disk performance lead when it came to random writes when the Threaded I/O Tester when randomly writing eight threads of 64MB writes.

From the 24 tests shown via the Phoronix Test Suite, Ubuntu 10.10 ruled when it came to the OpenGL performance, it was mixed between the two operating systems when looking at the OpenCL computational performance, and with the CPU-bound tests it was often mixed as to whether Mac OS X or Ubuntu was superior, but it seemed Ubuntu did do better when it came to more of the multi-threaded benchmarks. Mac OS X conquered Ubuntu when it came to the PostgreSQL and random write disk performance on its Journaled HFS+ file-system, but in the other disk tests EXT4 on Ubuntu came in first. In few tests did using the self-hosted GCC 4.5.1 release on each operating system vastly change the outcome.

Next up we will be looking at the encrypted disk options and ultimately its performance for each of the operating systems (Apple's FileVault vs. home directory enCryptFS encryption on Ubuntu), along other future articles.

Discuss this article in our forums, IRC channel, or email the author. You can also follow our content via RSS and on social networks like Facebook, Identi.ca, and Twitter (@Phoronix and @MichaelLarabel). Subscribe to Phoronix Premium to view our content without advertisements, view entire articles on a single page, and experience other benefits.

7
Next Page >>
Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Sumo Lounge Emperor
  2. Gallium3D Continues Improving OpenGL For Older Radeon GPUs
  3. 15-Way Open vs. Closed Source NVIDIA/AMD Linux GPU Comparison
  4. Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Comparison Shows Shortcomings
Latest Software Articles
  1. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  2. AMD Radeon R600 GPU LLVM 3.3 Back-End Testing
  3. F2FS File-System Shows Regressions On Linux 3.10
  4. Previewing The Radeon Gallium3D Shader Optimizations
Latest Linux News
  1. Benchmarking The Intel P-State, CPUfreq Changes
  2. FreeBSD Still Working On Next-Gen Package Manager
  3. DNF Still Advancing As Experimental Yum For Fedora
  4. Logitech Begins Supporting Linux Users
  5. Modern Intel Gallium3D Driver Still Being Toyed With
  6. Linux 3.10 Kernel Benchmarks On A Core i7 Laptop
  7. GCC 4.8.1 Compiler Due To Be Out Next Week
  8. Linux 3.10 Kernel Benchmarks For Intel Ivy Bridge
  9. Linux's "Ondemand" Governor Is No Longer Fit
  10. Firefox 22 Beta Enables WebRTC Support
  11. OpenSUSE 13.1 Milestone 1 Released
Latest Forum Talk
  1. Benchmarking The Intel P-State, CPUfreq Changes
  2. DRM Moves Ahead With HTML5 Specification
  3. Logitech Begins Supporting Linux Users
  4. OpenSUSE Considers Replacing LXDE With E17
  5. FreeBSD Still Working On Next-Gen Package Manager
  6. Sumo Lounge Emperor
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite