Linux Can Deliver A Faster Gaming Experience Than Mac OS X

Published on December 10, 2010
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 2
Discuss This Article

Earlier this week on Phoronix were new benchmarks of Ubuntu Linux vs. Mac OS X using a new Apple Mac Book Pro with an Intel Core i5 CPU and a NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M graphics processor. When looking at the tests results overall it ended up being a competitive race between these two Microsoft Windows competitors. In some areas, like the OpenCL computational performance, Apple's operating system commanded a sizable lead. In other areas, like the OpenGL graphics performance, Ubuntu Linux backed by NVIDIA's official but proprietary driver was in control. Here's an additional set of tests showing the measurable leads of NVIDIA Linux over Mac OS X with Apple's NVIDIA driver.

This article has four OpenGL gaming tests that are native to both platforms and with each game they were run at 800 x 600, 1024 x 768, 1280 x 1024, 1400 x 1050, 1680 x 1050, and 1920 x 1080. The same hardware and software configurations were used, with the Mac Book Pro having a 2.4GHz Intel Core i5 520M CPU, 4GB of DDR3-1066MHz system memory, a 320GB Hitachi HTS54503 SATA HDD, and NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M graphics. This is a 2010 15-inch Mac Book Pro and during testing it was connected to an ASUS 1080p LCD display. The software side was a comparison between Mac OS X 10.6.5 and Ubuntu 10.10 with the Linux 2.6.35 kernel, X.Org Server 1.9.0, and NVIDIA's official 260.19.06 display driver that can be found in the Ubuntu Maverick package repository. Run via the Phoronix Test Suite were Nexuiz, Warsow, OpenArena, and Urban Terror.

The open-source Nexuiz game was CPU-bound so the frame-rate was virtually unchanged when increasing the resolution up to 1920 x 1080, but as you can see, with this game NVIDIA's official Linux driver was 66% faster than Apple's official NVIDIA Mac OS X driver on the same hardware.

When looking at the Qfusion-powered Warsow game, there was a much more noticeable difference in performance between the two operating systems when looking at the frame-rate at lower resolutions, but even at 1920 x 1080, Ubuntu still came out ahead. Ubuntu 10.10 with the NVIDIA 260 driver was 24% faster on average in this test.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Intel Haswell HD Graphics 4600 vs. AMD Radeon Graphics On Linux
  2. Intel Haswell HD Graphics 4600 Performance On Ubuntu Linux
  3. Intel Core i7 4770K "Haswell" Benchmarks On Ubuntu Linux
  4. The First Experience Of Intel Haswell On Linux
Latest Software Articles
  1. Optimized Binaries Provide Great Benefits For Intel Haswell
  2. 11-Way Linux, BSD Platform Comparison
  3. SNA Acceleration Works Great For Intel Core i7 Haswell
  4. The Linux Evolution For Intel Haswell's Performance
Latest Linux News
  1. KDE's KWin Made Lots Of Progress In 4.11
  2. Ubuntu Announces Carrier Advisory Group
  3. Qt 5.1 Release Candidate 1 Has Arrived
  4. In-Fighting Continues Over Mir On Non-Unity Ubuntu
  5. Subversion 1.8 Presents New Features
  6. LLVM 3.3 Officially Released
  7. LLVM/Clang Now Uses Loop Vectorizer At New Levels
  8. Intel GPU Driver Tries To Rip Out FBDEV Support
  9. Coreboot Doing AMD USB 3.0, Q35 QEMU Emulation
  10. VP9 Codec Now Enabled By Default In Chrome
  11. openSUSE 13.1 M2 Plays On PulseAudio 4.0
Latest Forum Talk
  1. In-Fighting Continues Over Mir On Non-Unity Ubuntu
  2. Intel GPU Driver Tries To Rip Out FBDEV Support
  3. Ubuntu Announces Carrier Advisory Group
  4. Intel Haswell HD Graphics 4600 vs. AMD Radeon...
  5. Planetary Annihilation Plans To Come To Linux
  6. The Wayland Situation: Facts About X vs. Wayland
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite