1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

AMD Catalyst: Ubuntu 12.10 vs. Windows 7

Michael Larabel

Published on 19 October 2012
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 7 - 86 Comments

For those wondering about the performance of Ubuntu Linux 12.10 versus Microsoft Windows 7 when using the same system and the Catalyst graphics driver, here are new Phoronix benchmarks of an AMD Radeon HD 6870 graphics card when running a variety of OpenGL workloads from Ubuntu 12.10, Kubuntu 12.10 (the KDE desktop version of Ubuntu 12.10 to avoid the Unity desktop overhead), and Microsoft Windows 7 Professional x64.

Back in September I delivered new OpenGL Linux vs. Windows performance benchmarks when using Intel graphics and then a NVIDIA graphics comparison with multiple graphics cards. In this article are the AMD Catalyst results from the competing operating systems. This time around a Radeon HD 6870 graphics card was used for testing, but due to problems between the packaged fglrx driver and the Unity desktop, only this graphics card was tested and not a range of graphics cards as done in previous multi-OS comparisons.

Microsoft Windows 7 and Ubuntu 12.10 were tested in their stock configurations. The KDE-based version of Ubuntu 12.10 was also tested due to the significant overhead of the Unity desktop with Compiz. With the KDE desktop, desktop effects were automatically suspended on full-screen windows. Catalyst 12.9 (fglrx 9.0.2 / OpenGL 4.2.11903) was used on the Linux side while at the time the Windows testing was done the Catalyst 12.8 driver was the latest (12.8 couldn't be used on Ubuntu 12.10 due to xorg-server 1.13 compatibility). The open-source Radeon Linux driver wasn't tested in this comparison since the unofficial driver simply isn't comparable to Catalyst in terms of performance, OpenGL compliance, and other features.

The same Intel Core i7 3770K "Ivy Bridge" test system was used on both Linux and Windows for this Radeon HD "Northern Islands" graphics cards. The Intel Linux vs. Windows testing showed that the proprietary Intel Windows driver was much faster than the open-source Linux driver for the latest-generation of Intel GPUs. The NVIDIA graphics driver is largely a shared code-base between Linux and Windows so there the performance is more comparable, but still Windows has advantages in some areas due to desktop differences, etc.

Latest Articles & Reviews
  1. Preliminary Tests Of Intel Sandy Bridge & Ivy Bridge vs. Broadwell
  2. AMD FX-8320E Performance On Linux
  3. Linux Compiler Benchmarks Of LLVM Clang 3.5 vs. LLVM Clang 3.6-rc1
  4. Intel Broadwell HD Graphics 5500: Windows 8.1 vs. Linux
  5. Linux Benchmarks Of NVIDIA's Early 2015 GeForce Line-Up
  6. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960: A Great $200 GPU For Linux Gamers
Latest Linux News
  1. PlayStation 4 System Compiler Support Landing In LLVM
  2. Now-Closed KDE Vulnerabilities Remind Us X11 Screen Locks / Screensavers Are Insecure
  3. Vivaldi: A New Chromium-Powered, Multi-Platform Browser
  4. KDE Plasma 5.2 Officially Released
  5. Intel Broadwell On Linux Has Working OpenCL 1.2, VP8 Video Acceleration
  6. GParted 0.21 Brings ReFS Detection, EXT4 For RHEL5, Reiser4 For Linux 3.x
  7. Wine Staging Update Has Better CUDA Support, Driver Testing Framework
  8. Nouveau In Linux 3.20 Will Have A Lot Of Code Cleaning
  9. Compare Your Linux System To The i7-5600U Broadwell X1 Carbon ThinkPad
  10. Debian 8.0 "Jessie" Installer RC1 Released
Most Viewed News This Week
  1. Windows 10 To Be A Free Upgrade: What Linux Users Need To Know
  2. LibreOffice 4.4 Is Coming Soon With New Features
  3. Google Admin Encourages Trying Btrfs, Not ZFS On Linux
  4. TraceFS: The Newest Linux File-System
  5. My Initial Intel Broadwell Linux Experience With The ThinkPad X1 Carbon
  6. Keith Packard Leaves Intel's Linux Graphics Work
  7. Interstellar Marines On Linux With Catalyst: Bull S*#@
  8. Faster VP9 Decoding Is On The Horizon