1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

AMD Radeon Catalyst Performance: Windows 7 vs. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS

Michael Larabel

Published on 23 May 2012
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 5 of 5 - 26 Comments

For the Xonotic game with high quality visuals and a 2560 x 1600 resolution, the Windows 7 Catalyst driver continued to be faster than Ubuntu 12.04 with the same month's Catalyst. For this test the Windows 7 stack was 14% faster than the popular desktop Linux distribution. The NVIDIA driver meanwhile did better under Linux compared to the Windows build.

With Ultra quality visuals for Xonotic, Windows 7 with Catalyst on the Radeon HD 7950 was 7% faster the Ubuntu 12.04 LTS software stack.

Lastly, with the "ultimate" visuals, the results were much closer between the two competing operating systems with the frame-rate difference coming in at less than 4%.

While for the most part the Catalyst driver performance for the Radeon HD 7950 graphics card was close between Windows 7 and Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, there were some OpenGL performance differences. The performance should largely be the same since the Catalyst code-base is mostly shared across AMD's supported operating systems with the driver weighing in at millions of lines of code. However, there were some differences, including when the NVIDIA Linux driver would be faster than its Windows counterpart, the AMD Catalyst Linux driver would struggle in comparison. At the end of the day though, the differences are not likely to make or break your decision in choosing between Windows and Linux when using the company's proprietary graphics drivers.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 Offers Great Linux Performance
  2. CompuLab Intense-PC2: An Excellent, Fanless, Mini PC Powered By Intel's i7 Haswell
  3. From The Atom 330 To Haswell ULT: Intel Linux Performance Benchmarks
  4. AMD Radeon R9 285 Tonga Performance On Linux
Latest Linux Articles
  1. 6-Way Ubuntu 14.10 Linux Desktop Benchmarks
  2. Ubuntu 14.10 XMir System Compositor Benchmarks
  3. Btrfs RAID HDD Testing On Ubuntu Linux 14.10
  4. Ubuntu 14.10 Linux 32-bit vs. 64-bit Performance
Latest Linux News
  1. Enlightenment's EFL 1.12 Alpha Has Evas GL-DRM Engine, OpenGL ES 1.1 Support
  2. GTK+ Lands Experimental Backend For Mir Display Server
  3. Ubuntu 14.10 Officially Released
  4. Mesa 10.4 Might Re-Enable HyperZ For R600g/RadeonSI
  5. Intel GVT-g GPU Virtualization Moves Closer
  6. GTK+ 3.16 To Bring Several New Features
  7. Debian 8.0 Jessie Has Many Multimedia Improvements
  8. What Linux Benchmarks Would You Like To See Next?
  9. Open-Source, Linux Support For Corsair Link Devices Slowly Materializing
  10. Cairo-Dock 3.4 Shows A Lot Of Progress, Works Toward EGL/Wayland Support
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Linux hacker compares Solaris kernel code:
  2. Advertisements On Phoronix
  3. HOPE: The Ease Of Python With The Speed Of C++
  4. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  5. Users/Developers Threatening Fork Of Debian GNU/Linux
  6. Ubuntu 16.04 Might Be The Distribution's Last 32-Bit Release
  7. AMD Releases UVD Video Decode Support For R600 GPUs
  8. Proof that strlcpy is un-needed