AMD R600/700 2D Performance: Open vs. Closed Drivers

Published on September 30, 2009
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 5
Discuss This Article

While the ATI Radeon HD 5800 graphics cards were introduced last week, the open-source support for the Radeon HD 2000/3000/4000 series is finally maturing. The Linux 2.6.32 kernel will feature kernel mode-setting support for these ATI R600/700 graphics processors as well as the DRM support for allowing 3D acceleration. The classic Mesa support for the Radeon HD 2000 through Radeon HD 4000 series is maturing and is now able to run basic OpenGL games and applications, while the Gallium3D support is still a ways out. However, now that there is finally the Catalyst 9.10 driver within Ubuntu Karmic Koala that supports the latest kernel, we are finally able to directly compare the performance of AMD's Catalyst driver and that of the latest open-source code. In this article we have benchmarks showing the 2D performance between these two driver options with both an R600 and R700 graphics card.

For this round of Linux 2D benchmarks we tested an ATI Radeon HD 3850 (RV670PRO) and then the ATI Radeon HD 4650 (RV730). We tested both of these graphics cards on a system running an Ubuntu 9.10 (x86_64) daily LiveCD snapshot with the Linux 2.6.31-10-generic kernel, GNOME 2.28.0, and X Server 1.6.3. The open-source DDX driver was xf86-video-ati 6.12.99 with the respective Linux 2.6.31 kernel DRM (using the EXA acceleration during the testing process) and then the proprietary driver was the Catalyst 9.10 driver that is currently available through Ubuntu's package repository. The rest of the hardware on this test system included an AMD Sempron 3400+ clocked at 2.16GHz, an ECS A790GXM-A motherboard, and Seagate 250GB ST3250310AS SATA HDD.

With the two ATI Radeon graphics cards and the two drivers being tested, we ran the Phoronix Test Suite with the JXRenderMark, GtkPerf, and QGears2 test profiles to test out the 2D performance in this forthcoming Ubuntu release. Chris Wilson has been working on a cairo-perf-trace test profile for the Phoronix Test Suite as a better 2D benchmark, but that test is not ready for this article.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Sumo Lounge Emperor
  2. Gallium3D Continues Improving OpenGL For Older Radeon GPUs
  3. 15-Way Open vs. Closed Source NVIDIA/AMD Linux GPU Comparison
  4. Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Comparison Shows Shortcomings
Latest Software Articles
  1. Intel Linux OpenGL Driver Leading Over Apple OS X
  2. The Cost Of Ubuntu Disk Encryption
  3. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  4. AMD Radeon R600 GPU LLVM 3.3 Back-End Testing
Latest Linux News
  1. Debian GNU/Hurd 2013 Release Brings New Packages
  2. Intel Ultrabook Performance Is Faster With Mesa 9.2
  3. Hot Relocation HDD To SSD Support For Btrfs
  4. Phoronix Test Suite 4.6.0 "Utsira" Released
  5. New Intel X.Org Driver Supports All Of Haswell
  6. SQLite Now Faster With Memory Mapped I/O
  7. Microsoft Releases Skype For Linux 4.2, Has Bug-Fixes
  8. Qt For Tizen Launches, Based On Qt 5.1
  9. KTAP Released For Linux Kernel Dynamic Tracing
  10. Linux 3.10-rc2 Kernel Takes In A Few Extra Pulls
  11. QEMU 1.5 Supports VGA Passthrough, Better USB 3.0
Latest Forum Talk
  1. Hot Relocation HDD To SSD Support For Btrfs
  2. Debian GNU/Hurd 2013 Release Brings New Packages
  3. FreeBSD Still Working On Next-Gen Package Manager
  4. What is the best nvidia gpu for gaming?
  5. Kubuntu, KDE Has Little Hope For Ubuntu's Mir
  6. Intel Linux OpenGL Driver Leading Over Apple OS X
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite