1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

AMD's New Athlon/Semprons Give Old Phenom CPUs A Big Run For The Money

Michael Larabel

Published on 20 April 2014
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 6 - 24 Comments

Curious how AMD's new AM1 platform APUs compare to the original AMD Phenom processors? Wondering myself, I ran some tests showing how the Sempron 2650 and 3850 along with the Athlon 5150 and 5350 compare to the original Phenom 9500 and Phenom II X3 710 processors with RS780/RS880 motherboards. Besides the new APUs being competitive against the old hardware while costing much less than the original Phenom CPUs, their power consumption is also at a fraction of AMD's former high-end processors. Here's a brief but nice look at AMD's processing evolution in going from Phenom CPUs to today's AMD budget APUs.

The Phenom 9500 (Agena) was one of AMD's original quad-core Phenoms and came clocked at 2.2GHz with a 95 Watt TDP and was introduced in late 2007. Meanwhile, the Phenom II X3 710 (Heka) came in 2009 and was a 2.6GHz processor with a 95 Watt TDP. It should be fairly interesting to see how these former high-end AMD CPUs compare to today's ultra-budget APUs. The top-end AM1 APU, the Athlon 5350, costs just about $55 USD and has a 25 Watt TDP.

The AMD Phenom 9500 was run from an ECS A790GXM-A motherboard with the RS780 chipset that sported Radeon HD 3300 graphics. The newer AMD Phenom II X3 710 was run from the MSI 890GXM-G65 with RS880 chipset that offered Radeon HD 4290 graphics. The Phenom 9500 and Phenom II X3 710 were the last of my original AMD Phenom systems (and other older AMD hardware) still running that haven't yet been decommissioned within the Phoronix test labs.

These two AMD Phenom systems were then run against the Sempron 2650/3850 and Athlon 5150/5350 APUs running from the ASUS AM1I-A motherboard. The hardware components were maintained the same where possible and relevant to our processor/graphics test focus. This testing was mainly done for interesting test purposes to see how far AMD's processors have come since the original AMD quad-core Phenom the better part of a decade ago.

All systems were running Ubuntu 14.04 x86_64 with upgrades to the Linux 3.14 kernel and Mesa 10.2-devel. All benchmarking was handled via the Phoronix Test Suite software.

Latest Articles & Reviews
  1. Samsung 850 EVO SSD Linux Benchmarks
  2. Kubuntu 15.04 Is Turning Out Quite Nice, Good Way To Try Out The Latest KDE
  3. 5-Way Linux Distribution Comparison On The Core i3 NUC
  4. OCZ ARC 100 Linux SSD Benchmarks
  5. Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Works Great As A Linux Ultrabook
  6. Transcend SSD370 256GB
Latest Linux News
  1. HTC & Valve Partnered Up For The Steam VR Headset
  2. 8cc: A Small C11 Compiler
  3. Not Everyone Likes The Possible "VULKAN" Name For Next-Gen OpenGL
  4. The Binary Blobs Making Up Coreboot
  5. Linux 4.0 & LLVM vs. GCC Yielded Much Interest This Month
  6. XBMC/Kodi 15.0 Alpha 1 Released
  7. Xfce 4.12 Released After Nearly Three Years Of Work
  8. The Khronos Group Filed A Trademark On "Vulkan" API
  9. Mozilla Thunderbird Adoption Climbs, Thunderbird 38 In May
  10. The Most Popular Linux Benchmark Results On OpenBenchmarking.org
Most Viewed News This Week
  1. Linux 4.0-RC1 Tagged, Linux 4.0 Will Bring Many Notable Improvements
  2. Screenshots Of The GNOME 3.16 Changes
  3. More Proof That Allwinner Is Violating The GPL
  4. The Tremendous Features Of Fedora 22
  5. Krita 2.9 Released, Their Biggest Release Ever
  6. Linux 4.0 Doesn't Have The Weirdest Codename
  7. A Single UEFI Executable With The Linux Kernel, Initrd & Command Line
  8. Canonical Comes Up With Its Own FUSE Filesystem For Linux Containers
%%CLICK_URL_UNESC%%