Amazon EC2 Micro: Barely Faster Than A Nokia N900?

Published on January 03, 2011
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 4 of 4
Discuss This Article

With the PostMark test, the t1.micro ended up beating out the Nokia N900 and Dell Mini 9, but the Fedora 14 guest continued to secure the lead.

The Fedora KVM guest was also faster at a simple task like measuring the time to unpack the Linux kernel source package.

In the final test, which was the SQLite database benchmark, the t1.micro instance secured its first major win. The reason for this lead though is largely because the Amazon Linux AMI operating system using EXT3 by default, which tends to do better than EXT4 with this particular disk test.

While Amazon allows free access to the Micro EC2 instance for one year's time to new customers, as you can see the performance is not great at all. In most of the tests carried out, an Intel Atom N270 32-bit netbook was much faster than this virtualized system in Amazon's Elastic Compute Cloud. In several tests, the t1.micro was closer performance-wise to a Nokia N900 smart-phone than it was an old Intel netbook. Besides the slow performance, its performance was also variably slow based upon available compute power in the cloud. The pricing on the EC2 On-Demand Micro Instance after the free period expires is two cents per hour for a Linux/Unix instance or $0.03 USD for a Microsoft Windows instance.

For anything but the simplest tasks, the t1.micro instance is almost too much. Fortunately, though Amazon's other available on-demand instances in their cloud-computing infrastructure are much better. Stay tuned for our greater Amazon EC2 tests of the m1.small, m1.large, m1.xlarge, m2.xlarge, m2.2xlarge, m2.4xlarge, c1.medium, and c1.xlarge instance types in the coming days, which is far more interesting and are much more powerful than an ARM-based smart-phone or an Atom netbook. You can also look at our initial Amazon EC2 benchmarks from December for Ubuntu EC2 on the large and extra large cloud instances rather than Amazon Linux AMI.

Discuss this article in our forums, IRC channel, or email the author. You can also follow our content via RSS and on social networks like Facebook, Identi.ca, and Twitter (@Phoronix and @MichaelLarabel). Subscribe to Phoronix Premium to view our content without advertisements, view entire articles on a single page, and experience other benefits.

4
Next Page >>
Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Gallium3D Continues Improving OpenGL For Older Radeon GPUs
  2. 15-Way Open vs. Closed Source NVIDIA/AMD Linux GPU Comparison
  3. Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Comparison Shows Shortcomings
  4. AMD Radeon Gallium3D More Competitive With Catalyst On Linux
Latest Software Articles
  1. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  2. AMD Radeon R600 GPU LLVM 3.3 Back-End Testing
  3. F2FS File-System Shows Regressions On Linux 3.10
  4. Previewing The Radeon Gallium3D Shader Optimizations
Latest Linux News
  1. DNF Still Advancing As Experimental Yum For Fedora
  2. Logitech Begins Supporting Linux Users
  3. Modern Intel Gallium3D Driver Still Being Toyed With
  4. Linux 3.10 Kernel Benchmarks On A Core i7 Laptop
  5. GCC 4.8.1 Compiler Due To Be Out Next Week
  6. Linux 3.10 Kernel Benchmarks For Intel Ivy Bridge
  7. Linux's "Ondemand" Governor Is No Longer Fit
  8. Firefox 22 Beta Enables WebRTC Support
  9. OpenSUSE 13.1 Milestone 1 Released
  10. DRM Graphics Driver Comes For Dove/Cubox
  11. JADE: An LLVM-Based Video Decoder For MPEG RVC
Latest Forum Talk
  1. DNF Still Advancing As Experimental Yum For Fedora
  2. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  3. DRM Moves Ahead With HTML5 Specification
  4. Linux's "Ondemand" Governor Is No...
  5. New Linux Kernel Vulnerability Exploited
  6. KDE's Krita Ported To OpenGL 3.1, OpenGL ES 2.0
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite